Evil Genius Message Board <br>http://www.evilgeniusentertainment.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 04, 2020, 04:04:30 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
New 2 Fat Drunks ep!
119311 Posts in 21242 Topics by 9889 Members
Latest Member: Jeremy


* Home Help Calendar Login Register
+  Evil Genius Message Board
http://www.evilgeniusentertainment.com

|-+  Non-entertainment News
| |-+  Miscellaneous
| | |-+  SCOTUS epically shits bed
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: SCOTUS epically shits bed  (Read 69 times)
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« on: June 15, 2020, 07:20:41 PM »

AMERICANS have long been subject to insane rulings from the Supreme Court, at least as far back 1859 when democrat head justice Roger B Taney told ex-slave Dredd Scott that no black man could ever be free, including those born free in slave-free northern states.

Today's ruling almost as ridiculous as that one, and although perhaps less likely to lead directly to Civil War, certainly added to the already massive mistrust in a court that has already issued some of the most bizarre rulings in this country's history.  Recently the court ruled that all Americans must buy any private service if the government labels it a tax (Obamacare), and that the Constitution guarantees the rights of gays to marry (it doesn't guarantee the rights of straights to marry much less gays).

Yet today the court managed to sink even lower as it ruled that the scientific definition of "sex" ie male or female is merely suggestive, stating that Title VII of the Civil Right act, which passed in 1964 before anyone could fathom transgenderism, applies to transgenderism and sexual orientation.  It's an incredibly gross reading of the law and one bound to (further) hurt women to boot.  By ruling this way, the court not only threw out any normal definition of sex and the sexes, but also construed the law makers of 1964 of having the same delusional interpretations as well.

Indeed, it's arguable that the law was always unconstitutional without reading into the law meanings never intended, or definitions without meaning.

In other words, instead of letting Congress simply pass its own law regarding this issue, it simply legislated it from the bench.  While I believe no one should be fired for being gay or being a tranny, it was not within the court's discretion to simply by fiat declare it so.  As ROE V WADE surely proves, when the court legislates from the bench the end result is almost always a bad one for America in the long run.  This silly ruling will produce an avalanche of future suits, including by trannies demanding to compete against girls and women.  

The Court also ruled it was OK for states to utterly band guns carried outside the home for any reason, for states to forbid federal agents into their states to enforce federal alw, and refused to consider outlawing Judaical immunity for bad cops and judges.

So to recap, the Supreme Court has ruled that a 56 year old law meant to protect blacks & women in the workplace actually means that the definition of "sex" is meaningless, that states have the right exclude federal cops from enforcing federal law, that a state may ban anyone from carrying a gun for any reason, and that cops, judges other government officials are above the law if the law says so.

A perfect shit show of awful today, and none of the these rulings were considered to be the "big cases" this summer.  I shudder to think what's coming next.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2020/06/15/Supreme-Court-declines-case-against-doctrine-shielding-police/1681592237128/

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-conservatives-get-massacred-fake-conservative-scotus/
« Last Edit: June 15, 2020, 07:41:12 PM by jdv » Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2020, 01:01:07 PM »

I shudder to think what's coming next.
]


...and today the SCOTUS ruled that nearly a 1 million illegals can stay in the country illegally because... reasons:

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/18/829858289/supreme-court-upholds-daca-in-blow-to-trump-administration?utm_term=nprnews&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_source=twitter.com


John Roberts seems to be in a personal quest to outdo Roger Taney for worst chief Justice ever.  Luckily for him, he's getting closer with each passing moment.

Which is of course very bad news for Americans.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2020, 02:09:39 PM by jdv » Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Warpig
Master of disaster
*

Instant karma is real +272/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 23457


Crush


« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2020, 01:33:38 PM »

There's a lot of thought to suggest that what Roberts just did was enable Trump to make endless executive orders that cannot be undone by future admins, and also, Trump can move to strike DACA again according to the ruling if they just do it differently.

It's unraveling at unreal speed.
Logged

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  _ Revelations 13
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2020, 01:51:09 PM »


It's unraveling at unreal speed.

War usually does.
Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Warpig
Master of disaster
*

Instant karma is real +272/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 23457


Crush


« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2020, 10:16:40 AM »

The shitting continues.

Chief Justice Roberts is a one-man killing machine.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/29/supreme-court-strikes-down-louisiana-abortion-clinic-law/

Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana Abortion Clinic Law

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a Louisiana law regulating abortion clinics, reasserting a commitment to abortion rights over fierce opposition from dissenting conservative justices in the first big abortion case of the Trump era.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined with his four more liberal colleagues in ruling that the law requiring doctors who perform abortions have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals violates the abortion right the court first announced in the landmark Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.


 

In two previous abortion cases, Roberts had favored restrictions.

The Louisiana law is virtually identical to one in Texas that the court struck down in 2016.

“The result in this case is controlled by our decision four years ago invalidating a nearly identical Texas law,” Roberts wrote, although he did not join the opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer for the other liberals.

In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote, “Today a majority of the Court perpetuates its ill-founded abortion jurisprudence by enjoining a perfectly legitimate state law and doing so without jurisdiction.”

President Donald Trump’s two appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, were in dissent, along with Justice Samuel Alito. The presence of the new justices is what fueled hopes among abortion opponents, and fears on the other side, that the Supreme Court would be more likely to uphold restrictions.

A trial judge had said the law would not provide health benefits to women and would leave only one clinic open in Louisiana, in New Orleans. That would make it too hard for women to get an abortion, in violation of the Constitution, the judge ruled.

But the appeals court in New Orleans rejected the judge’s findings and upheld the law in 2018, doubting that any clinics would have to close and saying the doctors had not tried hard enough to establish relationships with local hospitals.

The clinics filed an emergency appeal at the Supreme Court, asking that the law be blocked while the justices evaluated the case.

Early last year, Roberts joined with the four liberal members of the court to grant that request and keep the law on hold.

Roberts’ vote was a bit of a surprise because he voted in the Texas case to uphold the clinic restrictions. It may have reflected his new role since Kennedy’s retirement as the court’s swing justice, his concern about the court being perceived as a partisan institution and respect for a prior decision of the court, even one he disagreed with. Roberts didn’t write anything explaining his position at the time, but he had never before cast a vote on the side of abortion rights.

The regulations at issue in Louisiana are distinct from other state laws making their way through court challenges that would ban abortions early in a pregnancy.
Logged

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  _ Revelations 13
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2020, 10:17:54 AM »

Roberts has been as good a judge as W was a President.

Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Warpig
Master of disaster
*

Instant karma is real +272/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 23457


Crush


« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2020, 10:34:14 AM »

Oh, he's shit.

Nobody ever gives the 'liberal' justices shit, it's assumed they will be partisan.  This cuck wants the court to avoid looking 'partisan', which always seems to mean voting with the liberals.

Now I kinda want Iran to have the bomb.

We need something like that to 'reset' everything.

Launch em!

Logged

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  _ Revelations 13
Gunslinger
Bad Movie Muad'Dib
Admin
Swami
*****

Instant karma is real +11350/-65
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 13072


¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Boom Operator Supreme


« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2020, 03:41:41 PM »

I thought judges, especially Supreme Court judges were supposed to be non-partisan and follow the rule of law? There shouldn't be such a thing as a partisan judge. Personal politics should not factor into their rulings, right? Law over feelings?
Logged
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2020, 03:51:41 PM »

https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case
Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Warpig
Master of disaster
*

Instant karma is real +272/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 23457


Crush


« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2020, 03:58:32 PM »

What's crazy about this one though, is that Roberts ruled the EXACT OPPOSITE in an identical case from Texas.

It was HIS OWN RULING he just ruled against.

Honestly in this case it was just a ruling that says an abortion doctor should have admitting rights to hospitals in case there's a problem with an procedure.

Yes in Texas, no in Arkansas, apparently.
Logged

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  _ Revelations 13
Gunslinger
Bad Movie Muad'Dib
Admin
Swami
*****

Instant karma is real +11350/-65
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 13072


¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Boom Operator Supreme


« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2020, 01:37:20 AM »

Well. Shit. Guess Trump and McConnell better keep stacking the courts with conservative judges then. Clearly they aren’t toeing the party line. I mean, you have to stack the courts with partisan judges to win because their positions are so awesome. Right?
Logged
Warpig
Master of disaster
*

Instant karma is real +272/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 23457


Crush


« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2020, 06:58:10 AM »

Well. Shit. Guess Trump and McConnell better keep stacking the courts with conservative judges then. Clearly they aren’t toeing the party line. I mean, you have to stack the courts with partisan judges to win because their positions are so awesome. Right?

Gunz, I'm being serious here, do you read anything written here?

In this particular case, "Conservative" would have simply meant "Consistent with your OWN RULINGS."

This case isn't even about restricting abortions, no one's access to death docs was hampered in ANY WAY.  This was about ensuring that if you are going to murder babies, then at least have admitting rights to a hospital in case something goes wrong while you're murdering the baby so the mother doesn't die as well.

That's it, that's the only point of the law in Arkansas, which is exactly the same as the law in Texas.  So Roberts says: It's OK in Texas, but not OK in Arkansas?

Now, take off the helmet (and masK) for just a second:  Explain how that makes sense.  Explain to me why it's OK for an abortion doctor to not be required to have admitting rights to a hospital.

I'm as serious as a dead baby here, give me your reasoning, I will not attack it in any way, I swear.
Logged

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  _ Revelations 13
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2020, 08:39:30 AM »

Well. Shit. Guess Trump and McConnell better keep stacking the courts with conservative judges then.

That republicans can put any judges on at all is due to the democrats using the "nuclear option" back in 2013 under "Dingy" Harry Reid to eliminate the 60-vote rule on executive branch nominations & federal judicial appointments.  

The rule had stood in place since 1789, when the country was first created, before democrats changed it.

Those who've been interested in politics since before Trump ran for President will remember that democrats celebrated their "victory" over republicans despite warnings that it would come back to haunt them (only 3 dems voted against the measure).  

It was all done in an effort to pack the court with Obama judges, which of course they did.

But their Pyrrhic victory was just that and short lived - thanks to Harry Reid and other dumb-dumb democrats in 2013, Trump & the republicans have been able to add hundreds of federal judges (some 200 at this point).

Thus it is utterly the dems own fault for the current situation.


As a side note, each party has tried to "stack the court" since the very start of this country. The DREDD SCOTT ruling only happened because the democrat south had been able to populate the court with pro-slavery judges.  

So to condemn the republicans for doing it now is particularly silly, especially given the democrats hand in enabling them.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2020, 09:38:00 AM by jdv » Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
jdv
Admin
Master of disaster
*****

Instant karma is real +248/-222
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46599


Spirit of '76


« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2020, 02:58:22 PM »

This newest insane ruling not from SCOTUS but a federal court of appeals, which has ruled it's cool for cops to utterly destroy your home & pay you nothing as long as they were trying to catch someone:

"Federal Appeals Court rules Colorado homeowner whose property was left looking like 'Osama bin Laden's compound' after it was destroyed by a SWAT team during a standoff with a shoplifter is owed NO compensation

A federal appeals court ruled that a home owner isn't owed any compensation from police after a SWAT team blasted away at his Colorado house in a stand-off with an armed shoplifter and left the property a total loss.

Leo Lech sued after police in Greenwood fired gas munition and 40-millimeter rounds through the windows of his home in the June 2015 standoff with the shoplifter who had barricaded himself inside.

Cops even went as far as driving an armored vehicle through the doors, tossed flash-bang grenades inside and detonated explosives in the walls of the property.

Lech, who had estimated his losses at about $250,000 and filed a civil suit seeking compensation for the damages, was told he would get nothing by a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit on Tuesday, reports the Washington Post."
----------------------------------

With cops & judges like these, who needs criminals?

You'll get nothing and like it



https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/swat-team-blows-up-familys-home-in-search-of-a-shoplifter-supreme-court-says-so-what/270181

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/fifty-swat-cops-tore-down-house-shoplifting/
Logged

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Warpig
Master of disaster
*

Instant karma is real +272/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 23457


Crush


« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2020, 03:51:57 PM »

What could POSSIBLY be their justification?
Logged

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  _ Revelations 13
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  







GO TO THE EGE HOMEPAGE
GO TO THE OLD EGE SITE

The views expressed on this forum do not necessarily represent those of Evil Genius Entertainment, Crowboy Digital, or Crowboy.com.


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!