Evil Genius Message Board
http://www.evilgeniusentertainment.com

Entertainment News => Celebutards => Topic started by: jdv on October 05, 2017, 05:26:55 PM



Title: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 05, 2017, 05:26:55 PM
Looks like the nasty troll finally paying a price for being a troll....

"An investigation by The New York Times found previously undisclosed allegations against Mr. Weinstein stretching over nearly three decades, documented through interviews with current and former employees and film industry workers, as well as legal records, emails and internal documents from the businesses he has run, Miramax and the Weinstein Company."
------------------

The accusers include Ashley Judd.  The rumors of both sexual misconduct and generally being a dickhead have been around almost since the start.  Odd that it took so long for this to play out.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/us/harvey-weinstein-harassment-allegations.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/us/harvey-weinstein-harassment-allegations.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 05, 2017, 07:27:05 PM
(https://i.makeagif.com/media/11-17-2015/mvlNVu.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 06, 2017, 01:45:44 PM
But he's a super rich "feminist" and gives Hillary Clinton lots of money...  It must be the vast right-wing conspiracy that's framing him.

Some college guy that has sex with a girl who'd drank two beers then regrets it the next day because she already has a boyfriend and doesn't want to be accountable for her choices?... No trial needed. He's guilty of rape.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 06, 2017, 02:10:26 PM
But he's a super rich "feminist" and gives Hillary Clinton lots of money...  It must be the vast right-wing conspiracy that's framing him.

Some college guy that has sex with a girl who'd drank two beers then regrets it the next day because she already has a boyfriend and doesn't want to be accountable for her choices?... No trial needed. He's guilty of rape.

Holy shit, I'd get the fucking chair, man.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on October 06, 2017, 02:43:24 PM
Is Troy Duffy one of the accusers?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 06, 2017, 03:20:26 PM
Is Troy Duffy one of the accusers?

(http://worldwide-web.com/JeffreyBabad/Simpsons/Troy/fulltroy.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 06, 2017, 03:23:30 PM
The Dark Ones protect their own....

"In my mid-20s, I became a reporter and fact checker at the New York Observer, and part of my beat was covering the film business in New York. The night before the 2000 election, I was working on a story -- perhaps my first seriously reported story -- about O, the violent reimagining of Othello that Miramax's Dimension division was then sitting on, perhaps out of deference to the cringey clean-media message of the Al Gore–Joe Lieberman campaign, which Weinstein was publicly supporting; already there was talk of Weinstein's ambitions in Democratic politics. After Weinstein failed to respond to my calls for comment, I was sent, on Election Eve 2000, to cover a book party he was hosting, along with my colleague Andrew Goldman.

Weinstein didn’t like my question about O, there was an altercation; though the recording has alas been lost to time, I recall that he called me a cunt and declared that he was glad he was the "fucking sheriff of this fucking lawless piece-of-shit town." When my colleague Andrew (who was also then my boyfriend) intervened, first calming him down and then trying to extract an apology, Weinstein went nuclear, pushing Andrew down a set of steps inside the Tribeca Grand -- knocking him over with such force that his tape recorder hit a woman, who suffered long-term injury -- and dragging Andrew, in a headlock, onto Sixth Avenue.


Such was the power of Harvey Weinstein in 2000 that despite the dozens of camera flashes that went off on that sidewalk that night, capturing the sight of an enormously famous film executive trying to pound in the head of a young newspaper reporter, I have never once seen a photo. Back then, Harvey could spin -- or suppress-- anything; there were so many journalists on his payroll, working as consultants on movie projects, or as screenwriters, or for his magazine."
--------------------------------------------------

Golly!  
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLeC4A_XcAABx1_.jpg)

https://www.thecut.com/2017/10/why-the-weinstein-sexual-harassment-allegations-came-out-now.html (https://www.thecut.com/2017/10/why-the-weinstein-sexual-harassment-allegations-came-out-now.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on October 06, 2017, 03:43:44 PM
Is Troy Duffy one of the accusers?

(http://worldwide-web.com/JeffreyBabad/Simpsons/Troy/fulltroy.jpg)

You haven't seen 'Overnight'? About the rise and fall of Troy Duffy, the director of 'The Boondocks Saints'? You'd love it. How a man's hubris can destroy himself.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 06, 2017, 03:54:51 PM
Nope haven't seen that one pal. You got me on that one. I'll try to check it out.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 07, 2017, 03:21:17 PM
Oh Harvey.....

"A Fox News television reporter has become the latest individual to accuse Hollywood movie executive and Democratic Party mega-donor Harvey Weinstein of sexual misconduct, alleging that he masturbated in front of her in a restaurant hallway in an incident she claimed happened more than a decade ago.

Talking to the Huffington Post, Lauren Sivan claimed that whilst working as an anchor on a local cable channel in New York, Weinstein approached her at a private event in the Socialista nightclub in New York, before attempting to kiss her.

After Sivan rejected his advances, stating that she had a long-term boyfriend, Weinstein allegedly began to masturbate in front of her until he ejaculated into a potted plant, before zipping his trousers up and returning to the party."
------------------------------------------------------

No word yet on whether or not the plant died.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/07/reporter-claims-harvey-weinstein-masturbated-in-front-of-her/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/07/reporter-claims-harvey-weinstein-masturbated-in-front-of-her/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 07, 2017, 06:25:29 PM
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51CX2iYyU%2BL.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on October 07, 2017, 06:41:01 PM
That plant got a 3 picture deal at Mirimax.

I'll bring 'Overnight' the next time I'm out. Hopefully soon.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 08, 2017, 07:00:35 PM
https://www.thewrap.com/harvey-weinstein-fired-weinstein-company/ (https://www.thewrap.com/harvey-weinstein-fired-weinstein-company/)

And he's fired from his own company.

Literally, the company is called "The Weinstein Company", and he has been fired from it.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on October 09, 2017, 10:40:13 AM
I only have one good second hand Harvey story. During the days of the Michigan film incentive we got a couple of stereo conversion gigs from Dimension Films. One of them was Spy Kids 4. My boss went out to LA to show the converted footage to Weinstein, who bankrolled what ended up being a giant flop. After a few seconds of watching it he threw the glasses on the ground, got up and yelled "This fucking thing sucks!" And then went on to berate us for a poor conversion. My boss picked up the glasses, TURNED THEM ON and said please try again. Unlike in theaters, 3D TV glasses are battery powered and have on/off buttons.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 09, 2017, 11:55:50 AM
I only have one good second hand Harvey story. During the days of the Michigan film incentive we got a couple of stereo conversion gigs from Dimension Films. One of them was Spy Kids 4. My boss went out to LA to show the converted footage to Weinstein, who bankrolled what ended up being a giant flop. After a few seconds of watching it he threw the glasses on the ground, got up and yelled "This fucking thing sucks!" And then went on to berate us for a poor conversion. My boss picked up the glasses, TURNED THEM ON and said please try again. Unlike in theaters, 3D TV glasses are battery powered and have on/off buttons.

...and THEN he raped you?  Or was that before?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 09, 2017, 02:52:53 PM
Lots of people noticing that the mainstream media has done an awful lot to protect Weinstein....

http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/10/09/dan-gainor-weinstein-scandal-exposes-corruption-of-entire-media-entertainment-complex/ (http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/10/09/dan-gainor-weinstein-scandal-exposes-corruption-of-entire-media-entertainment-complex/)

https://www.thewrap.com/media-enablers-harvey-weinstein-new-york-times/ (https://www.thewrap.com/media-enablers-harvey-weinstein-new-york-times/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 09, 2017, 03:02:50 PM
And speaking of enablers, Glenn Close, Meryl Streep and Judi Dench all condemn Harvey.... but of course, NEVER heard the rumors.

Even though everyone else even remotely connected to showbiz had.

BTW, Meryl Streep once called Harvey "God," in a moment of pure stupid.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4962826/Meryl-Streep-slams-disgraceful-Harvey-Weinstein.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4962826/Meryl-Streep-slams-disgraceful-Harvey-Weinstein.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 09, 2017, 03:07:00 PM
God of Rape?

Is that a thing?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 09, 2017, 03:16:28 PM
Gods of rape & stupid - a perfect pantheon for Hollywood knuckle-heads.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 10, 2017, 03:46:50 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964380/Donna-Karan-defends-Harvey-Weinstein-blames-victims.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964380/Donna-Karan-defends-Harvey-Weinstein-blames-victims.html)

Bitches had it coming I guess.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 10, 2017, 09:12:15 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964380/Donna-Karan-defends-Harvey-Weinstein-blames-victims.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964380/Donna-Karan-defends-Harvey-Weinstein-blames-victims.html)

Bitches had it coming I guess.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/donna-karan-sorry-comments-blaming-harvey-weinsteins-accusers/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/donna-karan-sorry-comments-blaming-harvey-weinsteins-accusers/)

INSTANT regret.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 10, 2017, 09:17:00 AM
"Fuck dem hoes!"

- Donna Karan


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 10, 2017, 04:16:36 PM
The torrent of "What?  I had no idea!" statements by actors not strong enough to pull off that particular lie continue to pour out even as others remind the world that yes, everyone in Hollywood knew exactly what a piece of shit Harvey is.

Ben Affleck, George Clooney and Jenifer Lawrence maintain that they, like Sgt Shultz, knew nothing.  Meanwhile back in reality, Jessica Chastain tweeted this:

"I was warned from the beginning. The stories were everywhere. To deny that is to create an enviornment for it to happen again."

HERETIC!  Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton - who took mountains of cash from Harvey - finally issued a 38 word statement condemning him, while making no mention of the fact that she too apparently never heard that Harvey was a leetch.  Also not happening, her returning single dollar of his donations.

While some people predicting Harvey will survive, the reality is that once the Left turns on you, it turns hard.  He's all done in Hollywood... but may continue to lurk in the shadows of Democrat fundraisers.  Apparently Harvey attacking the NRA not enough (perhaps because it make no fucking sense).

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/jessica-chastain-weinstein-stories-everywhere/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/jessica-chastain-weinstein-stories-everywhere/)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/hillary-clinton-finally-breaks-silence-harvey-weinstein/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/hillary-clinton-finally-breaks-silence-harvey-weinstein/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 10, 2017, 05:54:21 PM
6 days after the news broke that Harvey might just be a piece of shit, all 3 major nightly news programs ran stories on him, all noting that some new heavy hitters - like Angelina Jolie - have also come forward to also accuse him.

However, none of them mentioned the massive influence Harvey has in the Democrat party, a rather odd omission considering a) just how big this story is b) the mountains of pics and videos with Dem bigwigs, and c) that party's rather notorious reputation for poor decisions regarding sex. 

Huh.

How dare Seth make this joke (he was fired immediately after the show)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 10, 2017, 09:00:54 PM
That's some stones there boi.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 10, 2017, 09:03:58 PM
"You knew....you KNEW!"

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/report-nbc-news-passed-ronan-farrow-bombshell-report-rape-allegations-weinstein/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/10/report-nbc-news-passed-ronan-farrow-bombshell-report-rape-allegations-weinstein/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 10, 2017, 09:18:01 PM
Whoa there bucko - you want me to believe that NBC News buried a story that would obviously hurt a big Democrat backer?  No way.....

Besides, other dems - well, not Hillary - are giving back every red cent.  Well, not every cent...

"After the allegations against Weinstein were made public, Democratic Party politicians, as well as the Democratic National Committee (DNC), have pledged to give away Weinstein’s contributions to charity.

In a statement, the DNC claimed they would give away just $30,000 to left-wing organizations, despite the fact that Weinstein donated nearly $250,000 to the organization since the 1990s."
----------------------

Of course, that's just some the "on the table" money - note, the actual total much higher then $250K (he gave $250K to Clinton slush fund alone).  And God knows how much money  passed underneath.

Either way, you break that glass ceiling girl!  Hillary & Harvey 2020!!!!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 10, 2017, 10:40:56 PM
...And the stink is so thick that it's starting to stick to Disney....

"Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner claimed he had “no idea” what Weinstein was up to when Disney owned Miramax in the 1990s and early 2000s. Eisner says he fired the Weinsteins because they were “irresponsible,” and “Harvey was an incorrigible bully.”
--------------------

Well, "incorrigible bully" is one phrase for an alleged rapist, but "rapist" is a better one.  Again, the notion that anyone in the biz didn't know what Harvey was is completely ridiculous. 

And the Obama's - long time friends of Harvey and his money - finally condemned their now ex-friend, but laughingly said nothing about the thousands of dollars Harvey raised at 2008 & 2012 fundraisers (to say nothing of the money he personally gave).

So to recap, a decades long known pervert and alleged rapist had access to the highest pillars of power in the Democrat party, was protected multiple times throughout the years by such media giants as NBC News and the New York Times and by the silence of notable Democrat actors (like all of 'em), while the people who took money from this person have done nothing to return it. 

The media continues to protect those same Dems from the spotlight they normally so eagerly seek even as star after star comes forward with yet more tales of his nastiness.

Fascinating. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/09/harvey-weinstein-scandal-live-wire-quentin-jlaw-remains-silent-kevin-smith-disavows/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/09/harvey-weinstein-scandal-live-wire-quentin-jlaw-remains-silent-kevin-smith-disavows/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 10, 2017, 10:53:04 PM
Meanwhile, about those people who deny they knew anything about Hard Luck Harvey....

"Rose McGowan has accused Ben Affleck of being a liar for allegedly concealing information about disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein two decades ago.

The actress reacted Tuesday to Affleck’s declaration that “additional allegations of assault that I read this morning made me sick” after The New Yorker published an expose detailing instances where Weinstein allegedly raped women by forcibly performing or receiving oral sex, and forcing vaginal sex.

Several hours later, McGowan said in a tweet that the actor has been well aware of Weinstein’s behavior for many years: “Goddamnit! I told him to stop doing that,” she claims he said to her at a “press [conference] I was made to go to after [the] assault.” She added, “You lie.”

In another tweet, she told Affleck to “f— off.”
------------------

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that maybe just maybe Hollywood people ain't where America should derive it's moral code from. 

I'll also say that Warner Brothers probably would have just as soon as had Affleck - who is still playing Batman in the upcoming JUSTICE LEAGUE flick - not open his yap.

http://variety.com/2017/film/news/rose-mcgowan-ben-affleck-harvey-weinstein-1202586189/ (http://variety.com/2017/film/news/rose-mcgowan-ben-affleck-harvey-weinstein-1202586189/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 11, 2017, 05:22:41 AM
I think that's a solid suggestion in any event.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 11, 2017, 07:06:48 AM
(http://ace.mu.nu/archives/shocked.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 11, 2017, 08:11:55 AM
That she should share the same space, even in a meme, with Claude Rains, is a travesty.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on October 11, 2017, 10:05:22 AM
Wait a minute... Ben Affleck is a lying piece of shit? I am SHOCKED. Good thing Warner Bros. bet their entire billion dollar DC Universe franchise on him.

South Park was only 14 years ahead of the curve on this story.

https://www.youtube.com/v/DzM7xKi2LJs



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 11, 2017, 02:48:01 PM
Speaking of Big Ben...

"Ben Affleck apologized to actress Hilarie Burton for groping her during an appearance on "TRL" in 2003.

"I acted inappropriately toward Ms. Burton and I sincerely apologize," Affleck tweeted Wednesday."
----------------------------

Whew, glad it was only her.....

It all makes you wonder about the casting of Affleck - a decision immediately questioned by anyone who ever even read a single page of the comic book - how much did Harvey influence it?  

Seems pretty clear that an unknown guy - say Clark Bartrum - had no chance at all if Harvey's in the background making "suggestions" to Warner Brothers.  

None of it's a good sign for JUSTICE LEAGUE, which as far as I can, has no name villain (at least not in the the trailer I saw).  But hey, I'm sure all of Ben Affleck's die-hard fans will really put those butts in the seats.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/11/ben-affleck-apologizes-for-groping-actress-hilarie-burton.html (http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/11/ben-affleck-apologizes-for-groping-actress-hilarie-burton.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 11, 2017, 05:41:34 PM
This today from the Washington Post:

"Did the media help Harvey Weinstein lure his prey and smear his accusers?

It wasn’t just the complicit silence around Harvey Weinstein’s sexual harassment that made it so dangerous.  It was the opposite of silence, too.  It was the public humiliation that could be used to retaliate against alleged victims who spoke out.

Weinstein used the media like a bludgeon to keep his alleged victims in line, by many accounts. He did it skillfully — and with plenty of help.

“Harvey could spin — or suppress — anything; there were so many journalists on his payroll, working as consultants on movie projects, or as screenwriters, or for his magazine,” Rebecca Traister wrote last week in New York magazine’s the Cut about an altercation in 2000 with Weinstein."
--------------------------------------

Ironic indeed that the WaPo - who's been about as guilty as any news media outlet in the past decade of burying stories it found might hurt liberals like Weinstein - runs a headline about the media bullying people, but such is the size of this story that there is no ignoring it. 

It's going to be very hard for stars and the media that protected Harvey to continue to claim ignorance even as they tried to distance themselves from him. 

It's also going to be hard for the Manhattan DA and the NYPD to explain why it didn't press charges on Harvey, even after they conducted a sting on him where yup, he put near-rape level pressure on a chick to fuck him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/did-the-media-help-harvey-weinstein-lure-his-prey-and-smear-his-accusers/2017/10/10/705b4bf2-adf5-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html?utm_term=.3489fc148f9b (https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/did-the-media-help-harvey-weinstein-lure-his-prey-and-smear-his-accusers/2017/10/10/705b4bf2-adf5-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html?utm_term=.3489fc148f9b)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on October 11, 2017, 05:47:05 PM
Yeah... he and Justice league are kinda fucked too.

Quote
Now attention has turned to examine Affleck’s relationship with women throughout the years. For starters, fat Batman was groomed into an industry fixture by Weinstein himself. Weinstein took a gamble on Good Will Hunting when Affleck was doing shitty Kevin Smith movies (Miramax as well). Then there’s his kid brother Casey, who will surely be getting a lot more coverage in the next few days now that calling out sexual predators is en vogue.

Then this interview from 2004, where Ben Affleck (during his J-Lo days) talks about a reporter’s tits while wrangling her in his lap for five minutes, surfaces. It’s just as rapey as it sounds, and Ben sounds pretty drunk.


source - http://www.thesuperficial.com/ben-affleck-americas-next-top-sexual-predator-10-2017 (http://www.thesuperficial.com/ben-affleck-americas-next-top-sexual-predator-10-2017)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 11, 2017, 06:17:28 PM
Oh Ben, you'll always be America's Batman.  I mean, not in this reality, but I'm sure in one of the infinite universes, you're THE MAN!  

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/10/Sized-420x315.jpg)

Alas, in this reality another actress has come forward with accusations of groping from Ben, even as Harvey - like Polanski did - flees the country.  And isn't Ben the dude who got busted fucking his kid's maid?  I'm glad I don't own stock in WB right now....

Meanwhile, rumors are flying that the Department of Justice and the FBI are looking to see if Harvey broke any federal laws.  What are the odds that answer is, "Yup."   Oopsy-doopsy!

And today Tom Hanks, this reality's Tom Hanks, said this: "Isn’t it kind of amazing that it took this long?”

Well, not when you have every media outlet in NYC and LA running cover for you it ain't.  It's doubly true when politicians and police do the same.  

All of which has made Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama announce today that they're respectively returning the hundreds of thousands of dollars they took from Harvey...  

Just kidding.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/09/harvey-weinstein-scandal-live-wire-quentin-jlaw-remains-silent-kevin-smith-disavows/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/09/harvey-weinstein-scandal-live-wire-quentin-jlaw-remains-silent-kevin-smith-disavows/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 12, 2017, 03:08:00 PM
Oh oh - Anthony Bourdain better not fly in any plane taking off from Arkansas any time soon....

"Current and former aides to Hillary Clinton ganged up on Anthony Bourdain on Twitter after Bourdain criticized Clinton for her delayed response to the sexual harassment allegations against Harvey Weinstein.

Clinton received criticism for initially staying silent after the New York Times reported last week that several women have accused Weinstein, the powerful Hollywood producer and Democratic mega-donor, of sexual harassment, assault, and even rape."

Bourdain tweeted this:

"And I have to say, Hillary's interview with Fareed Zakaria was shameful in its deflection and its disingenuousness."
-----------------------------

Naturally, the long knives came out for Bourdain immediately from the usual suspects.   I mean, how DARE Bourdain criticize poor Hillary?  Just because she took hundreds of thousands of dollars from a known monster without returning a single cent of it when everyone else found out what she knew?

It should be noted that Bourdain has carried a lot of water for liberal politicians over the years, so yet another example of the Left eating itself.

http://freebeacon.com/culture/clinton-aides-gang-boyfriend-harvey-weinstein-accuser/ (http://freebeacon.com/culture/clinton-aides-gang-boyfriend-harvey-weinstein-accuser/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 12, 2017, 03:23:59 PM
And it keeps getting worse for Hollywood's paragon of virtue....

"Actress Kate Beckinsale joined the ever-expanding list of women accusing Harvey Weinstein of sexual abuse, alleging in an Instagram message Thursday that she “said no” to the disgraced film producer “many times over the years” — the first of which when she was 17-years-old.

“I was called to meet Harvey Weinstein at the Savoy Hotel when I was 17,” the Underworld film franchise star wrote. “I assumed it would be in a conference room which was very common. When I arrived reception told me to go to his room. He opened the door in his bathrobe. I was incredibly naive and young and it did not cross my mind that this older, unattractive man would expect me to have any sexual interest in him.”

“After declining alcohol and announcing that I had school in the morning I left, uneasy but unscathed,” Beckinsale wrote."

The award-winning actress said Weinstein asked years later if he’d ever come unto her, which is when she “realized he couldn’t remember if he had assaulted me or not.”
------------------------------------------------------

"Hey bitch, there was grass on the field."

- Everyone in Hollywood

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/12/kate-beckinsale-harvey-weinstein-offered-alcohol-hotel-room-17/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/12/kate-beckinsale-harvey-weinstein-offered-alcohol-hotel-room-17/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 12, 2017, 03:59:00 PM
McGowan now lashing out at Amazon's Jeff Bezos....

"Rose McGowan is claiming that Amazon optioned a television series from her only to kill it soon after when she voiced concern about a possible move the company was making to bailout Weinstein.

'I told the head of your studio that HW raped me. Over & over I said it. He said it hadn’t been proven. I said I was the proof,' said McGowan on Thursday in a tweet directed at company founder Jeff Bezos.

'I had already sold a script I wrote to your studio, it was in development. When I heard a Weinstein bailout was in the works.'

She then added: 'I forcefully begged studio head to do the right thing. I was ignored. Deal was done. Amazon won a dirty Oscar.'

That 'dirty Oscar' seems to be a reference to Casey Affleck's Best Actor win for 'Manchester by the Sea' earlier this year, an award that Ben's younger brother took home despite two women accusing him of sexual harassment."
--------------------------------------

Speaking of the Oscars, apparently they're in a while knuckle panic about their stars.  Well never worry, with Jimmie Kimmel as host, it will be like nothing happened.... in other words, just like always!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4975366/Rose-McGowan-lashes-Jeff-Bezos-says-HW-raped-her.html#ixzz4vKUN1zq3 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4975366/Rose-McGowan-lashes-Jeff-Bezos-says-HW-raped-her.html#ixzz4vKUN1zq3)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 12, 2017, 04:38:33 PM
- Weistein's book division shutting down.   Which is sad news for all those lovers of BARELY LEGAL....

- This probably doesn't help Harvey a whole lot - he once said, “Hollywood has the best moral compass”.... while he was attempting to free admitted child rapist Roman Polanski.

- Actress Emma Thompson calls Weinstein a “predator” in an interview with the BBC and says the sexual harassment and abuse allegations leveled at the movie producer are “endemic” to Hollywood. She adds Weinstein is just the “top of a a very particular iceberg.”

- "Hanoi" Jane Fonda just admitted she knew:  “I found out about [Harvey Weinstein] about a year ago. And I’m ashamed that I didn’t say anything right then.”

Just found out last year did ya?  Great story Hanoi, stick to it.  Meanwhile, could you preach to us about the evils of guns or otherwise give us poor fools in the midwest some moral leadership?  'Cause that'd be great.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLzY1W4UIAA1Tn0.jpg)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/09/harvey-weinstein-scandal-live-wire-quentin-jlaw-remains-silent-kevin-smith-disavows/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/09/harvey-weinstein-scandal-live-wire-quentin-jlaw-remains-silent-kevin-smith-disavows/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 12, 2017, 06:22:40 PM
And the fallout continues to destroy Hollywood....

"Amazon TV Producer Goes Public With Harassment Claim Against Top Exec Roy Price -

You will love my dick," Price allegedly said to Isa Hackett, a producer on 'The Man in the High Castle,' who details a July 2015 incident at Comic-Con in San Diego.

In the wake of revelations about Harvey Weinstein’s alleged years-long sexual harassment and assault, a producer of one of Amazon Studios’ highest-profile TV shows is ready to talk about her “shocking and surreal” experience with Amazon’s programming chief Roy Price.

Isa Hackett is the daughter of author Philip K. Dick, whose work is the basis for Amazon’s The Man in the High Castle, as well as the upcoming anthology series, Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams. Hackett, 50, is an executive producer on both series. Price, 51, is head of Amazon Studios and has presided over its growth into a major streaming service with such series as Transparent and movies such as Manchester by the Sea. His family has deep connections in the entertainment world: His father, Frank, ran Columbia Pictures and Universal Studios. "
-----------------------------------------

But please keep telling us who to vote for, what to think, and otherwise guide oh mighty Hollywood - we're such rubes.  I mean, after you love my dick that is.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amazon-tv-producer-goes-public-harassment-claim-top-exec-roy-price-1048060 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amazon-tv-producer-goes-public-harassment-claim-top-exec-roy-price-1048060)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 12, 2017, 08:09:47 PM
Quote from: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amazon-tv-producer-goes-public-harassment-claim-top-exec-roy-price-1048060
What can change the culture in Hollywood?

It is said over and over and sounds like a cliché, but we desperately need more women in leadership positions in Hollywood. There’s a culture of harassment [in Hollywood] and we need an infusion of new and diverse leadership, not just including women but gay people, people of color, people with disabilities — people with the full spectrum of life experience.

Yes. Elevating people that occupy arbitrary circles on a Venn diagram to unearned positions of power will fix everything because, like the noble savage, they are incapable of abusing such power.

Just to play Devil's advocate here, say that, hypothetically, some of these women were abusing their own bit of power by accusing people of things that are not quite true? Well, you are absolutely required LISTEN AND BELIEVE any woman making accusations against a man regardless of what reality indicates one way or another. Don't you?

And they say zombies don't eat each other.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0iFtHlCYAAH-yU.png)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 13, 2017, 07:37:14 AM
"Amazon Studios boss Roy Price is going on a leave of absence, the company confirmed, amid details emerging of a 2015 incident involving Isa Hackett Dick, executive producer of Amazon’s The Man In The High Castle and upcoming Philip K Dick’s Electric Dreams."
--------------------------------

I guess Bezos doesn't love Price's dick either....

"Well, you are absolutely required LISTEN AND BELIEVE any woman making accusations against a man regardless of what reality indicates one way or another."

Sometimes a rapist is just a rapist.  In Harvey's case, the shoe is a perfect fit.  This is miles away from Lena Dunham making up rapists to get a book deal (which she did).  But let's be real - who makes up the jacking off in a plant story?  It's way too weird not to be true (and as the past 5 years in movies prove, these people ain't as creative as they think they are).

Maybe Harvey, Roman Polanski, and Woody Allen - all worshiped in Hollywood - can form their own studio, which of course will be run by a woman.  A very hot woman, perhaps in her teens...

I mean if we're going to to hire women because it's the only way to keep rapists from running the studios, they might as well be hot. And super young.  With big knockers.  Also, could Hollywood lecture me again on the benefits of trannies using bathrooms and the evils of Christopher Columbus?  I mean besides all their rape, threats, and the coverups, they're paragons of virtue and I'm so easily confused without their leadership.  

http://deadline.com/2017/10/roy-price-amazon-sexual-harassment-claim-man-in-the-high-castle-producer-1202187548/ (http://deadline.com/2017/10/roy-price-amazon-sexual-harassment-claim-man-in-the-high-castle-producer-1202187548/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 13, 2017, 10:11:07 AM
I just found out a girl was killed last week, and you knew about it.

You knew it was dangerous.

But you let the people go swimming anyway.



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: timmy2442 on October 13, 2017, 10:42:11 AM
Harvey Weinstein, everybody.

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/8d/79/e3/8d79e379cb87a69e214322980992ffc1.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 13, 2017, 01:49:29 PM
As you know, "Weinstein" means friendship.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 13, 2017, 04:25:25 PM
Oh oh!  Mr. Box Office Poison himself now being accused being part and parcel of the slime:

"George Clooney has been accused of helping “blacklist” an actress after she complained of sexual and racial harassment.

“Clooney helped blacklist me when I spoke up [about] harassment on ER,” claimed ER actress Vanessa Marquez in a post on Twitter. “Women who dont play the game lose career… I did.”

“He’s not who he pretends [to be],” added Marquez in another post. “Wells, NBC, Amblin, WB, cast & crew & my agents all complicit in my #Blacklist [for] speaking UP in ’95”

After one user expressed their shock that Clooney would be accused of covering up sexual harassment, Marquez replied, “He’s a monster in his own way… Everyone should know The Truth About Clooney.”
------------------------------------------------

The truth about Clooney is.... he couldn't open a movie if his life depended on it. That he might have been helping rapists get more ass is the least of his sins in Hollywood's eyes.  'Cause morals yo.

Did you hear the one about a disgusting rapist who was protected by every liberal politician and media outlet for decades?  It's HILARIOUS!
(https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/78f5a1b577a1f7f86b470bdb84363d09b43ec8a2/c=137-0-2864-2050&r=x408&c=540x405/local/-/media/2017/10/05/USATODAY/USATODAY/636428118154633790-GTY-159271115-53555637.JPG)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/13/george-clooney-accused-helping-blacklist-actress-complaints-sexual-harassment/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/13/george-clooney-accused-helping-blacklist-actress-complaints-sexual-harassment/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 14, 2017, 04:20:13 PM
Prolly the least of his worries, but yet another sign he's being abandoned by his former besties as the Oscars won't have Harvey to kick around any more....

"Embattled film mogul Harvey Weinstein — a once-dominant force in the Academy Awards who rewrote the rules of Oscar campaigning — has been expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in response to mounting allegations of sexual harassment and assault against him."

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-harvey-weinstein-film-academy-20171014-story.html (http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-harvey-weinstein-film-academy-20171014-story.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 14, 2017, 10:04:21 PM
(http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-you-never-let-a-serious-crisis-go-to-waste-and-what-i-mean-by-that-it-s-an-opportunity-rahm-emanuel-8-91-00.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 16, 2017, 03:12:00 PM
Speaking of sleazeballs, the Clinton's won't be returning one penny:

http://deadline.com/2017/10/clinton-founation-harvey-weinstein-donations-not-return-spent-1202189062/ (http://deadline.com/2017/10/clinton-founation-harvey-weinstein-donations-not-return-spent-1202189062/)

And everyone from Scotland Yard to the NYPD is opening investigations into Harvey.  Meanwhile Hollywood and the Left struggle to frame this in the least damaging way, which mostly seems to be not talking about it all. 

Zero references to the hundreds of thousands given to the very highest pillars of the Democrat party on SNL 2 days ago, or anywhere else, including any of the nightly news shows....

And actresses like Kate Winslet who are both condemning Harvey, while acting for his and Woody Allen's productions are being singled out for their hypocrisy.   I guess if Harvey's only try to bang young powerless actresses, it's OK.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 16, 2017, 06:54:41 PM
I don't see young women as being completely powerless. They have agency and something of value to offer. This might include an assortment talents, but it definitely includes their asses. Behaving as if they have no power whatsoever (a damsel in distress) is a passive-aggressive power strategy. It's called hypoagency. They obviously can derive power from people coming to their aid and defense. There's no escaping it.

They may choose fuck and suck their way to the top in Hollywood or anywhere else. That can certainly be gratifying in the short term. But it can also be a deal with the devil they can end up paying for down the line, can't it? Instead of sucking a mile of dicks, they could do other things like sucking it up and go back to Iowa or working hard at something else while they're still relatively young. It's their own natural greed and narcissism that makes them go along with it.

So there can be plenty of moral turpitude on both sides of that quid pro quo. And as above so below.

Isn't all this feminist sexual liberation great?


And yes, where are the angry crowds of protestors wearing pussyhats? Why are they nowhere to be found in all of this? Curiouser and curiouser.

(http://media.giphy.com/media/B1aOlXWCIUYjS/giphy.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 16, 2017, 08:15:52 PM
Speaking of curious....

"Harvey Weinstein is no stranger to sex scandals -- back when Bill Clinton was battling allegations he lied about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, Weinstein had the president’s back, and a hefty check in hand.

A recently uncovered 1998 story in The Washington Post lists the powerful producer -- now accused of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women -- among several Hollywood heavyweights who gave the maximum $10,000 to Clinton’s legal defense fund.

The detail gives a fuller picture of the longstanding financial relationship between the former first family and one of their best West Coast fundraisers. That relationship has been under the microscope after Hillary Clinton came under criticism for waiting five days to condemn Weinstein."
------------------------------------

Huh.  Meanwhile, Variety is going to publish their next issue all about the scandal - and others - yet it's just as hard to believe they didn't know all about Harvey long before this week's issue. 

And will anyone go after the many, many pedophiles that have long plagued show biz?  Odds are of course not, as those people will be just as involved in helping Dem politicians as Harvey was. 

After all, as they so often remind us, they know what's best about everything.

Variety - so brave, so heroic
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMR2e7sVoAAYez1.jpg)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/16/harvey-weinstein-helped-pay-bill-clintons-legal-bills-during-monica-era-washington-post-archive-reveals.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/16/harvey-weinstein-helped-pay-bill-clintons-legal-bills-during-monica-era-washington-post-archive-reveals.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 17, 2017, 01:04:38 AM
Stop with the pedophilophobia.

Hate has no home here.

🙃


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 17, 2017, 09:06:34 AM
The other shoe's a comin'.....

https://www.thedailybeast.com/hollywoods-other-open-secret-besides-harvey-weinstein-preying-on-young-boys (https://www.thedailybeast.com/hollywoods-other-open-secret-besides-harvey-weinstein-preying-on-young-boys)

Hollywood’s Other ‘Open Secret’ Besides Harvey Weinstein: Preying on Young Boys

‘This is a place where adults have more direct and inappropriate connection with children than probably anywhere else in the world,’ claimed former child actor Corey Feldman.


Last week, former child actor Corey Feldman (Stand by Me, The Goonies) tweeted that he’d been asked for a statement about Harvey Weinstein’s sexual-harassment and rape allegations. It makes sense, since he has spent years speaking out about sexual abuse in Hollywood—not of women, but of young men. He has long alleged that pedophilia is the worst problem in Hollywood and that it’s in part responsible for his best friend Corey Haim’s eventual death by drug overdose.

Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter in 2016, Feldman said: “[Haim] had more direct abuse than I did. With me, there were some molestations, and it did come from several hands, so to speak, but with Corey, his was direct rape, whereas mine was not actual rape. And his also occurred when he was 11. My son is 11 now, and I can’t even begin to fathom the idea of something like that happening to him. It would destroy his whole being. As I look at my son, a sweet, innocent, 11-year-old boy and then try to put him in Corey Haim’s shoes, I go, ‘Oh my God—well of course he was erratic and not well-behaved on sets and things like that.’ What more could we expect of him really?”

He continued, “Everybody deals with things differently. I’m not able to name names. People are frustrated, people are angry, they want to know how is this happening, and they want answers—and they turn to me and they say, ‘Why don’t you be a man and stand up and name names and stop hiding and being a coward?’ I have to deal with that, which is not pleasant, especially given the fact that I would love to name names. I’d love to be the first to do it. But unfortunately California conveniently enough has a statute of limitations that prevents that from happening. Because if I were to go and mention anybody’s name, I would be the one that would be in legal problems and I’m the one that would be sued. We should be talking to the district attorneys and the lawmakers in California, especially because this is where the entertainment industry is and this is a place where adults have more direct and inappropriate connection with children than probably anywhere else in the world.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The clip of Feldman being shamed by Barbara Walters is striking.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/17/corey-feldmans-tense-barbara-walters-interview-recirculates-amid-harvey-weinstein-scandal.html (http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/17/corey-feldmans-tense-barbara-walters-interview-recirculates-amid-harvey-weinstein-scandal.html)

Corey Feldman's tense Barbara Walters interview recirculates amid Harvey Weinstein scandal

“There are people that were the people that did this to both me and Corey [Haim] that are still working. They’re still out there, and that are some of the richest most powerful people in this business. And they do not want me saying what I am saying right now,” Feldman said on “The View” in 2013.

Walters questioned Feldman, “Are you saying they are pedophiles and that they are still in this business?”

Feldman said “yes” without hesitation. “They don’t want me here right now. They want me dead.”

As Feldman went on to caution parents against putting their kids in show business, Walters interrupted, “You’re damaging an entire industry!

He then replied, “I’m sorry.”


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on October 17, 2017, 10:45:12 AM
Barbara Walters 'THE SPICE MUST FLOW!!!!!'


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 17, 2017, 01:46:03 PM
Barbara Walters 'THE SPICE MUST FLOW!!!!!'

Somethin's a flowin' alright.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 17, 2017, 02:56:01 PM
http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/bob-weinstein-sexual-harassment-1202592165/ (http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/bob-weinstein-sexual-harassment-1202592165/)

Looks like the Weinstein's pissed off SOMEBODY, now they're after his brother...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 17, 2017, 03:21:46 PM
Quote

Somethin's a flowin' alright.

Semen into young boy's asses?  

Also, it's been like 8 days without Hollywood's firm hand on the tiller.  I'm trying to be brave, but without their moral leadership, I'm lost.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 17, 2017, 04:05:29 PM
And the head of Amazon Studios - the guy who told Phillip K. Dick's grand daughter to "love my dick" - is gone:
http://deadline.com/2017/10/roy-price-resignes-amazon-studios-1202190107/ (http://deadline.com/2017/10/roy-price-resignes-amazon-studios-1202190107/)

Methinks he'll soon have lots of company in the California unemployment line.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on October 17, 2017, 04:31:44 PM
Everyone goes up one place on the totem pole.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 17, 2017, 06:34:56 PM
It might be a whole new pole when it's all over.  Remember all the allegations against Bryan Singer?  Well, the Daily Beast does too...

"Famed director Bryan Singer (X-Men) has had accusations leveled against him for years, from a lawsuit alleging that he made minors shower in the nude on film for Apt Pupil in 1997 to sexual-abuse allegations in 2014.

The Apt Pupil lawsuit was later dismissed due to lack of evidence, and the other sexual-abuse lawsuits were withdrawn by the accusers. However, that hasn’t stopped actors from singling out Singer. On Sunday, as the Weinstein scandal continued to unfold, actress Evan Rachel Wood tweeted, “Yeah lets not forget Brian [sic] Singer either.”

And then there was former The Real O’Neals star Noah Galvin, who in a since-deleted quote from an interview with Vulture, said: “Yeah. Bryan Singer likes to invite little boys over to his pool and diddle them in the f—ing dark of night. (Laughs.) I want nothing to do with that. I think there are enough boys in L.A. that are questionably homosexual who are willing to do things with the right person who can get them in the door. In New York there is a healthy gay community, and that doesn’t exist in L.A.”

The quote was later removed from the interview and Galvin issued an apology on Twitter: “I sincerely apologize to Bryan Singer for the horrible statement I made. My comments were false and unwarranted. It was irresponsible and stupid of me to make those allegations against Bryan, and I deeply regret doing so.”

The Singer allegations were also to be included in An Open Secret, filmmaker Amy Berg’s eye-opening documentary on the child sexual-abuse epidemic in Hollywood, but were later excised from the final cut. (Singer, for his part, stated that, “The allegations against me are outrageous, vicious, and completely false.”)"
------------------------------

You mean like Harvey claiming the allegations are false, or actually false?  'Cause Singer about as famous for his twinks as Harvey was for his young actresses.

And it should be noted that like Harvey Weinstein, Bryan Singer is a large contributor to the Democrat party and has been for years....

Huh.

I can't wait for him to tell me who to vote for in 2020!
(https://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/bryansinger.jpg?w=700)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/hollywoods-other-open-secret-besides-harvey-weinstein-preying-on-young-boys (https://www.thedailybeast.com/hollywoods-other-open-secret-besides-harvey-weinstein-preying-on-young-boys)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 17, 2017, 08:12:06 PM
(http://www.bdcwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/thrown-out-of-bar-gif.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 18, 2017, 07:41:39 AM
I do love a good joke. And this is the best ever.

A joke on the children.

Sacrifices must be made.

The house must be cleaned periodically.

It's time again.

(http://38.media.tumblr.com/abef8ee332bba032e68570002e42cd89/tumblr_nuwtvrtbuK1rrkahjo10_540.gif)

http://www.youtube.com/v/D6QjTBgdyFw


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 18, 2017, 07:42:13 AM
Yeah, that's an uber creepy (and pretty accurate) bit from HIII


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 19, 2017, 09:12:21 AM
http://theweek.com/articles/731375/hollywood-sitting-pedophilia-scandal (http://theweek.com/articles/731375/hollywood-sitting-pedophilia-scandal)

More rumblings.....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 19, 2017, 02:18:16 PM
Aw Pig, who cares if some poor gutter trash get buggered?  Especially when Hollywood keeps putting out classics the whole world loves?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 20, 2017, 06:40:08 AM
Sean Young says Harvey awkwardly whipped it out in front of her once in the early nineties.

(https://thehermitfool.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/stjbvku.gif)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2017/10/20/sean-young-alleges-harvey-weinstein-flashed-reveals-blade-runner/ (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2017/10/20/sean-young-alleges-harvey-weinstein-flashed-reveals-blade-runner/)

"I got a bad rep for saying 'No.' I made a movie with Harvey Weinstein, LOVE CRIMES, which didn't end up being a good movie. But I personally experienced him pulling his you-know-what out of his pants in order to shock me, and my basic response was, 'You know, Harvey, I really don't think you should be pulling that thing out, it's not very pretty.' ...And then leaving, and then never having another meeting with that guy again, because it was like, 'What on earth?'"

And... Oh my Gawd! Can we tawk here?  She also went on to mention a couple other famous names.

http://www.klbjfm.com/media/podcasts/10-19-2017-pt-3-sean-young (http://www.klbjfm.com/media/podcasts/10-19-2017-pt-3-sean-young)

"He's not the only one, I mean... Warren Beatty... Warren Beatty, now here's a really weird story, I auditioned for Barbra Steisand for THE MIRROR HAS TWO FACES, I think it was, and when I went to my audition with her she said to me, 'I think it's disgusting that you talked to the press!' And what I had said to the press was that I got... I was harassed... I was sexually harassed by Warren Beatty, and she told me she thought that was disgusting. And I said 'You think it's disgusting?' And she said, 'I was with Warren Beatty!' And I mean my... my mouth fell off and I said, 'Like, what? Am I the only actress who hasn't slept with Warren Beatty in this town? I mean, that can't be true!'"

(https://i.imgflip.com/yhzjy.jpg)

In response to the idea that her bluntness and refusal of some's advances may have harmed her career, she joked about it a bit but seemed to agree somewhat when she went on to express some humility, stating that perhaps she "could have been softer" with her rejections.

I can just imagine her busting out laughing or being insultingly sarcastic at some of these people. Laughing at people who are dead serious can definitely go poorly at times, but it can be difficult not to do so when you perceive yourself to be in the midst of an increasingly absurd situation. It might make an enemy or two.

Obviously her side of the story, but it seems like she didn't put up with nonsense from some annoying but powerful people.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 20, 2017, 07:00:56 AM
Are you sure it was his Penis?

I mean his 'you know what' could have been a contract, or maybe a comb for his hair?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 20, 2017, 07:27:38 AM
Are you sure it was his Penis?

I mean his 'you know what' could have been a contract, or maybe a comb for his hair?

Penis?!

(http://media.giphy.com/media/RXKCMLmch5W2Q/giphy.gif)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 23, 2017, 08:34:10 PM
The floodgates are about to open me-thinks....

"Oscar-winning writer-director Paul Haggis suggested Hollywood may be covering up serious allegations of child sexual abuse amid the continued industry fallout from from the scandal surrounding decades of allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse against disgraced super-producer Harvey Weinstein.

In an interview with The Guardian Sunday, the two-time Oscar-winning writer and director of Crash said that while much of Hollywood’s self-examination in the wake of the Weinstein scandal has been about the entertainment industry’s treatment of women, he would not discount the numerous allegations made by former child stars of sexual abuse, including those previously made by Corey Feldman and the late Corey Haim.

“It is not an innocent place and never has been,” Haggis told the paper of Hollywood. “Most of this behaviour has been aimed at women, but I am sure that former child stars such as Corey Feldman and Corey Haim, who have both made allegations in the past that no one took seriously, are worth considering, too.  Were people covering for paedophiles, too?” Haggis added. “We have to think that may have happened as well, because no one speaks out about being abused just to benefit their career. I find it particularly terrible that people had their dreams held to ransom in that way.”
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hollywood's one more scandal/box office flop from being completely wiped out.... well, I can hope anyway.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/23/paul-haggis-suggests-hollywood-pedophilia-cover-up/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/23/paul-haggis-suggests-hollywood-pedophilia-cover-up/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 24, 2017, 04:03:02 AM
Well, Spielberg kinda called this out a while ago, didn't he?

Obviously not the mechanism, but certainly the effect.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 24, 2017, 07:09:13 AM
Bad idea:

"Report: Woody Allen Next Film Features Sex Between Adult and 15-Year-Old Girl -

While Hollywood comes to grips with its culture of powerful men sexually harassing and abusing women, Woody Allen’s new film, A Rainy Day in New York, reportedly includes sex scenes between a 40-year-old Judd Law and a teenaged actress."
------------------

I just thank God that Woody's a genius.  I mean, not at movie making, but for consistently looking like a bag of shit.  How this dude is allowed within a thousand miles of a set shows just how f'd up Hollywood really is.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/23/report-woody-allen-next-film-features-sex-adult-15-year-old-girl/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/23/report-woody-allen-next-film-features-sex-adult-15-year-old-girl/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 24, 2017, 07:51:55 AM
How he's allowed 1000' from children is another mystery.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 24, 2017, 10:46:34 AM
The social contract between men and women has been shredded. What do you expect?

Also, though it may seem disturbing, girls who are raised without a consistent father figure around develop more quickly. It's nature's way of attracting a high value adult male.

Nature will fix things eventually. Entropy will always triumph. It could be really painful though.

My two cents on the big picture.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: timmy2442 on October 24, 2017, 02:01:32 PM
Quote
girls who are raised without a consistent father figure around develop more quickly.

Your words intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.  Seriously though, I have witnessed this phenomena first hand, but would still like to see the science behind it. 


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 24, 2017, 02:36:01 PM
Quote
girls who are raised without a consistent father figure around develop more quickly.

Your words intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.  Seriously though, I have witnessed this phenomena first hand, but would still like to see the science behind it.  

I wasn't being precise enough. It seems that it has to be the actual biological father and not just a father figure. I recalled it wrong.

http://news.berkeley.edu/2010/09/17/puberty/ (http://news.berkeley.edu/2010/09/17/puberty/)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079910/ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079910/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 12:00:59 AM
...And the fallout continues as Kevin Spacey is outed as a gay pedo:

"Kevin Spacey comes out as gay amid apology to Anthony Rapp for alleged sexual advance

Amid accusations from Anthony Rapp, the “American Beauty” star revealed that he has had relationships with men and women throughout his life.

“This story has encouraged me to address other things about my life. I know that there are stories out there about me and that some have been fueled by the fact that I have been so protective of my privacy. As those closest to me know, in my life I have had relationships with both men and women,” Spacey said.

“I have loved and had romantic encounters with men throughout my life, and I choose now to live as a gay man. I want to deal with this honestly and openly and that starts with examining my own behavior.”

Late Sunday, Rapp accused Spacey of trying to seduce him when he was 14."
------------------------

That Spacey would try to frame his coming out now - hours after being accused of what amounts to an attempted sex crime over - as being "honest" seems.... mighty coincidental.

This is what Rapp had to say about it:

"He [Spacey] picked me up like a groom picks up the bride over the threshold.  But I don't, like, squirm away initially, because I'm like, 'What's going on?' And then he lays down on top of me.  He was trying to seduce me. I don't know if I would have used that language. But I was aware that he was trying to get with me sexually."
----------------------------------

And this is what Spacey response to the claim he tried to bang a 14 year old boy with whom he was working with (and thus obviously had some authority over):

"I honestly do not remember the encounter, it would have been over 30 years ago. But if I did behave then as he describes, I owe him the sincerest apology for what would have been deeply inappropriate drunken behaviour, and I am sorry for the feelings he describes having carried with him all these years."
--------------------------

It's cool scro - you said you were sorry, and shit dude, you were fuckin' hammer drunk.  Lots of normal people try to fuck 14 year old boys they work with while shitfaced.

Naturally, like Weinstein and indeed all other Hollywood producers and actors accused of gross sexual misconduct in the past 3 weeks, Spacey has a long history of supporting Democrats and their philosophies.  

I'm starting to think maybe just maybe I shouldn't use Hollywood stars as my moral & intellectual compass....  Nah.  They know what's best.  

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/kevin-spacey-gay-article-1.3598122o (http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/kevin-spacey-gay-article-1.3598122o) Anthony Rapp for alleged sexual advance

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-30/kevin-spacey-response-to-sexual-misconduct-allegations/9100232 (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-30/kevin-spacey-response-to-sexual-misconduct-allegations/9100232)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 30, 2017, 08:40:00 AM
Yep.....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 03:31:32 PM
...And Netflix has cancelled HOUSE OF CARDS.

And the Left continues to eat itself as a slew of celebrities are crushing Spacey for trying to "hide behind a rainbow". 

But brave & courageous....

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/30/the-view-blasts-kevin-spacey-for-tying-homosexuality-to-pedophilia/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/30/the-view-blasts-kevin-spacey-for-tying-homosexuality-to-pedophilia/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 30, 2017, 04:23:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/9-kj1YopL9s


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 04:33:39 PM
Homosexuals and you!

Want to learn more?

(http://static1.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.3598149.1509374530!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635_424/kevin-spacey.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 06:19:38 PM
...And more people claiming Kevin "he gets a little rapey" Spacey tried to taker advantage of his fame....

"Several people now claim to know people who have been treated inappropriately by Spacey, including while he was artistic director of London’s Old Vic theatre.

Nadine West‏ tweeted: ‘KS [Kevin Spacey] groped my young male friend when they were both working at the Old Vic. Was apparently always known as one to avoid. Sadly unsurprised’.

Jennie Rigg-ormortis‏ replied and said: ‘Have heard similar from more than one source. Hope more people come forward, but understand if they feel they can’t"
-------------------------

HOUSE OF CARDS just started shooting it's (last) season.  It remains to be seen if Netflix will continue the shooting schedule, or just cancel it outright.... something tells me it does not have much of a chance - this topic is just too hot.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/30/house-of-cards-star-kevin-spacey-hit-with-more-sexual-misconduct-accusations/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/30/house-of-cards-star-kevin-spacey-hit-with-more-sexual-misconduct-accusations/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 30, 2017, 07:32:19 PM
Kevin Rapey, from now on.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 07:43:04 PM
Kevin Rapey, from now on.

Came up with all by me lonesome! 

BTW, rumors are swirling that Corey is a writing a tell-all that will name names.... if he gets paid.  Corey better get that money fast, 'cause more names are going to drop, with or without him.  See, it turns out that Hollywood isn't a paragon of anything other then smugness.


http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-entertainment-news-updates-corey-feldman-hollywood-pedophiles-1509372721-htmlstory.html (http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-entertainment-news-updates-corey-feldman-hollywood-pedophiles-1509372721-htmlstory.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 30, 2017, 08:25:32 PM
See, it turns out that Hollywood isn't a paragon of anything other than smugness.

(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/840/848/122.png)

BTW, I posted that House of Cards quote as my signature a few days ago.

Weird.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 09:29:52 PM
Quote

BTW, I posted that House of Cards quote as my signature a few days ago.

Weird.

Yes.... yes you did...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 30, 2017, 09:51:51 PM
Around here?  Par for the course.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 30, 2017, 11:30:36 PM
And goodbye penis!  Er, Emmy...

"The International Academy of Television Arts & Sciences – one of the groups behind the Emmys – will not go through with a planned award for Kevin Spacey, in light of sexual misconduct allegations against him, officials said Monday."
------------------

Because again, they were SHOCKED to learn of this.  Just shocked.

https://pagesix.com/2017/10/30/spacey-backlash-continues-as-emmy-group-pulls-award/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 30, 2017, 11:46:27 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/FfoE_PWeeaw


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 31, 2017, 03:53:11 AM
Woah, woah, woah......are you saying he lost out on an AWARD!?!?

Ok, it's time to stop, this has gone way too far.  When will this madness end!?!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 31, 2017, 06:45:38 AM
Shit just got real, didn't it?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 31, 2017, 02:55:22 PM
Rose McGowan has had a busy week.

Rose McGowan Says Arrest Warrant For Narcotics Is “A Load Of Horsesh*t”
http://deadline.com/2017/10/rose-mcgowan-arrest-warrant-narcotics-harvey-weinstein-1202198239/ (http://deadline.com/2017/10/rose-mcgowan-arrest-warrant-narcotics-harvey-weinstein-1202198239/)

http://www.youtube.com/v/X4lfApFYxCE


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 31, 2017, 03:32:35 PM
Apparently Kevin Spacey's father took his cosplay real serial.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/kevin-spacey-brother-father-sexual-abuse-actor-randall-fowler-thomas-geoffrey-fowler-a8029776.html (http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/kevin-spacey-brother-father-sexual-abuse-actor-randall-fowler-thomas-geoffrey-fowler-a8029776.html)

http://www.crimeonline.com/2017/10/31/neither-of-us-had-a-chance-growing-up-brother-of-kevin-spacey-says-father-was-a-nazi-who-raped-beat-abused-them/ (http://www.crimeonline.com/2017/10/31/neither-of-us-had-a-chance-growing-up-brother-of-kevin-spacey-says-father-was-a-nazi-who-raped-beat-abused-them/)

(https://co-a1.azureedge.net/co-uploads/2017/10/59f8b6a373fb9-59f8b6a373ff3Kevin-Spacey-father-and-brother-.jpg.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on October 31, 2017, 06:47:38 PM
Okay, is this sexual assault now, or is it different because you're famous?

http://www.youtube.com/v/uKQoJ71A8NQ

Hell with it. Sandler gets the gas chamber.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on October 31, 2017, 08:13:56 PM
Well, that's one of the many problems of a whiny immoral culture that has covered up its many sins all while preaching what's best - when the light's turned on, everyone runs for cover and if a few relatively innocent Hollywood types get burned, too bad.

It's the best movie Hollywood's made in years.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 01, 2017, 05:28:55 AM
Take yer medicine, boy.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 01, 2017, 07:10:35 AM
...and Netflix has halted HOUSE OF CARDS:

"Netflix has suspended production on the sixth and final season of its premiere political drama series House of Cards following multiple allegations of sexual misconduct against star Kevin Spacey."

At this point it looks like it ain't coming back agayn.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/31/netflix-suspends-production-house-cards-following-kevin-spacey-sex-misconduct-allegations/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/31/netflix-suspends-production-house-cards-following-kevin-spacey-sex-misconduct-allegations/)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 01, 2017, 08:00:19 AM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/BKqoHeHlbcRvW/giphy.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 01, 2017, 09:24:21 AM
It is becoming an hysterical frenzy.

That's it, Hollywood. Keep 'em wanting more.

http://m.eonline.com/news/890718/jeremy-piven-denies-sexual-assault-allegations-from-ariane-bellamar (http://m.eonline.com/news/890718/jeremy-piven-denies-sexual-assault-allegations-from-ariane-bellamar)

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/01/this-is-us-edits-out-kevin-spacey-reference-amid-sexual-harassment-claim.html (http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/01/this-is-us-edits-out-kevin-spacey-reference-amid-sexual-harassment-claim.html)

(http://media.giphy.com/media/x9TDhQRUNWrgQ/giphy.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 01, 2017, 09:39:43 AM
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/dustin-hoffman-sexually-harassed-me-i-was-17-guest-column-1053466 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/dustin-hoffman-sexually-harassed-me-i-was-17-guest-column-1053466)

Well COME ON now!

Quote from: Snowflake
One morning I went to his dressing room to take his breakfast order; he looked at me and grinned, taking his time. Then he said, "I'll have a hard-boiled egg … and a soft-boiled clitoris." His entourage burst out laughing. I left, speechless. Then I went to the bathroom and cried.

Seeeeeeriously?

This is on par with a 'casting couch' session?  Maybe you SHOULD go soft-boil your clit?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 01, 2017, 10:04:10 AM
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/dustin-hoffman-sexually-harassed-me-i-was-17-guest-column-1053466 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/dustin-hoffman-sexually-harassed-me-i-was-17-guest-column-1053466)

Well COME ON now!

Quote from: Snowflake
One morning I went to his dressing room to take his breakfast order; he looked at me and grinned, taking his time. Then he said, "I'll have a hard-boiled egg … and a soft-boiled clitoris." His entourage burst out laughing. I left, speechless. Then I went to the bathroom and cried.

Seeeeeeriously?

This is on par with a 'casting couch' session?  Maybe you SHOULD go soft-boil your clit?

Yeah. That's some weird game...

Of course, Warren Beatty crashes her story. 😬


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 01, 2017, 03:39:23 PM
Not sure Warren Beatty's the poster child for reliability.... mutha fucka can't even read a card right.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 01, 2017, 03:51:36 PM
...And Bret Ratner the latest to be accused by multiple women.  Ratner's company - Ratpac - one of the producers of JUSTICE LEAGUE, a film that is starting to look doomed for a variety of reasons...

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/11/GettyImages-145228999-1024x659.jpg)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/01/brett-ratner-harassment-justice-league/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/01/brett-ratner-harassment-justice-league/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 01, 2017, 04:21:09 PM
Sure his carer is destroyed, but at least Kevin Spacey gets a new Magic the Gathering card in his honor....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNkSjriXUAEMOn4.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 01, 2017, 04:54:32 PM
Well, that's the whole bit behind "An Open Secret", as you'll recall from 2FD a few episodes back.

They specifically reference Rattner.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 01, 2017, 05:07:22 PM
Well, that's the whole bit behind "An Open Secret", as you'll recall from 2FD a few episodes back.

They specifically reference Rattner.

Not Ratner!  This is just some of the stories out today....

Natasha Henstridge claims that Ratner blocked her from leaving a friend's house in the early nineties and then forced the then-19-year-old to perform oral sex.

Olivia Munn claims that in 2004 a pantless Ratner surprised her in his trailer and began masturbating in front of her to the point of ejaculation.

Katherine Towne claims Ratner followed her into his bathroom after she rejected his advances at a 2005 party and told her he liked women 'chubby sometimes'.


But he's SO talented - surely it's worth a little molesting if we get such classics as these gems...

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/be/Money_talks_poster_1997.jpg/220px-Money_talks_poster_1997.jpg)

(https://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/movie/movie_poster/the-family-man-2000/large_tL3ehhaFBkXnp51FCn6kCs2CuiW.jpg)

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41zJaLo7s7L._RI_.jpg)

(https://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/movie/movie_poster/rush-hour-3-2007/large_bQ1pEWUCOznpRczHykzgviqQz9I.jpg)

(https://livelyindepthmusicentertainment.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/hercules-rock.jpg)

Now THAT'S talent.  


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 02, 2017, 09:46:53 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/producer-bryan-singer-accused-sexual-misconduct-015929533.html (https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/producer-bryan-singer-accused-sexual-misconduct-015929533.html)

Sorry, it was actually Brian Singer being referenced in 'An Open Secret'.  (although they may have mentioned Ratner too, I'll have to check)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 02, 2017, 06:05:32 PM
And yet another  media outlet found to be protecting a fellow traveler - The Advocate admits to burying Spacey's name way back in 2001:

"In an article titled, “Why Did The Advocate Redact Kevin Spacey’s Name in 2001?” the magazine revealed that despite the fact they knew of Spacey’s alleged sexual misconduct with 14-year-old Rapp, they chose to keep his identity hidden.

“In 2001, Rent actor Anthony Rapp and Dennis Hensley — a former freelance writer for The Advocate — were both promoting CD releases at the time. Hensley believed he asked the LGBT magazine’s then-editor in chief, Bruce C. Steele, for ‘a little online space’ to help promote these projects,” the Advocate explained in their article. “But at one point during the brief back-and-forth, Rapp broached the topic of closeted actors. And a bombshell dropped. ‘That makes me think of [a certain leading man] in [a certain award-winning film],’ said Hensley at the time — the name and film were redacted in the final published article.”

The Advocate also pointed towards their “no outing” policy, claiming they would only out a closeted gay celebrity if it were a “criminal case,” which they decided Spacey’s wasn’t.
------------------------------------------------------

You gotta wonder what else the main stream media has hidden over the years if they're willing to kill stories about a rapist and pedophile.... no matter how brave and courageous and super-duper talented they may be.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/02/the-advocate-knew-about-kevin-spacey-in-2001-but-refused-to-name-him/ (http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/02/the-advocate-knew-about-kevin-spacey-in-2001-but-refused-to-name-him/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 02, 2017, 08:05:54 PM
I just thank our media betters that they outed a pedophile 16 years ago, thus saving God knows how many more young boys from being raped by Spacey...

Oh yeah:

"Man Comes Forward to Describe Sexual Relationship He Had With Kevin Spacey When He Was 14; Kevin Spacey Foundation to Help Young Actors and Artists Deletes Its Website -

He first met Spacey in 1981, when the actor was a guest teacher at a weekend acting class he took in Westchester County; he was then a 12-year-old student. Spacey was 22 and working in the New York theater scene. They met again by chance in line at Shakespeare in the Park in 1983, when the student was 14 years old; Spacey had made his Broadway debut in Henrik Ibsen’s Ghosts the year prior. After that meeting, he says, Spacey gave him his phone number, and the two began a sexual relationship.

The former student came forward, he says, because he was enraged at Spacey's response to Rapp's story. We have done our best to verify his account of his time with Spacey. We confirmed with two sources that Spacey taught at the acting school in 1981; checked the plausibility of dates and other details in his account; and spoke with people close to the former student, who said that he had spoken about his relationship with Spacey as far back as the 1990s.

We also spoke with his current therapist, who confirmed that he began speaking about it in sessions in 2015. And we have confirmed the other abusive relationship the former student discusses. We reached out to Spacey to talk about the relationship. He responded through his lawyer, who wrote in an email, "Mr. Spacey absolutely denies the allegations."
-------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, but how about that NRA huh?  I am right? 

http://www.vulture.com/2017/11/kevin-spacey-alleged-sexual-relationship.html?utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t (http://www.vulture.com/2017/11/kevin-spacey-alleged-sexual-relationship.html?utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 03, 2017, 12:11:48 AM
Thanks, Feminism.

Thanks, Hollywood.

Thanks, Baby Boomers.

Thanks, Gen Xers.

Thanks, Millenials.

Generation Z is gonna be pissed.

The consequence of this new sexual counter-revolution? No sex at all
Douglas Murray
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/the-consequence-of-this-new-sexual-counter-revolution-no-sex-at-all/ (https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/the-consequence-of-this-new-sexual-counter-revolution-no-sex-at-all/)

We are in the middle of a profound shift in our attitude towards sex. A sexual counter-revolution, if you will. And whereas the 1960s saw a freeing up of attitudes towards sex, pushing at boundaries, this counter-swing is turning sexual freedom into sexual fear, and nearly all sexual opportunities into a legalistic minefield.

The rules are being redrawn with little idea of where the boundaries of this new sexual utopia will lie and less idea still of whether any sex will be allowed in the end.

It is partly whipped along by the fact that each episode in the revolution is so grimly fascinating, and each has its own internal propulsions. For instance, nobody outside Hollywood could regret the disgrace of an overpraised toad who spent far too long surrounded by overly attractive people. After Harvey Weinstein’s downfall, who could not enjoy the resulting sweep of Tinseltown for DNA evidence — or mere hearsay — exposing that whole rotten, preachy, liberal façade?

Since then the exhilarating and powerful weapon of social media has whipped this along in every unpredictable direction. A journalist from GQ magazine was given the heave-ho after that famously prim publication learned that he had made an ungallant pass some years ago at a lady who was not his wife. How that hack’s opponents and competitors rubbed their hands with glee. Around the same time, a preachy hack from a left-wing website was found to have behaved grimly with women and his career too was dashed to the floor by people high on the octane of unreflective moral outrage.

This week the urge to purge the pervs has turned on the Houses of Parliament, with stories about ‘the Weinsteins of Westminster’ moving from the blogosphere to the newspapers. So far this has centred on a list of 27 MPs alleged to have behaved inappropriately towards women and 13 towards men. There is talk of investigations and firings. But this — it must be remembered — is not a list of people alleged to have committed crimes. It is a compilation of people heard to have been in some way forward with male and female researchers.

Among all this are stories which may need not only a focus but a criminal focus. Some now-public allegations will require a police investigation and maybe even prosecution. If the outing and shaming of sexual predators encourages other men and women who have been the victims of actual crimes to come forward then good should come from it.

But it is away from the law — tied up in the ‘#MeToo’ movement that followed Weinstein’s downfall — that the real revolution is happening. Accusations of genuine and monstrous abuse are being mixed with news that a cabinet member touched a woman’s knee many years ago. This week The Crown actress Claire Foy was forced to issue a statement saying she had not been offended after angry Twitter users pointed out that actor Adam Sandler had touched her knee — twice — during their appearance on The Graham Norton Show.

If deeds are so dangerous, what can be said about words? Sad to say, not all men are pitch-perfect in vocabulary and timing. Some are crass, some incorrigibly so. A BBC journalist recently revealed that in a restaurant some years ago a male colleague had told her: ‘I’m unbelievably sexually attracted to you. I can’t stop thinking about you.’ This was from a colleague twice her age, she said: ‘I had experienced sexism in the workplace before, but not in such an overt way.’ But was that really sexism?

A new generation is being encouraged to redraw the lines of acceptability in a way that goes too far. What once was gauche has now become unacceptable. And from unacceptable it is being made sackable and then elided with the criminal. That is a long way to go in a very short time.

When the sexual revolution began in the 1960s it reframed sexuality in the direction of greater freedom and licence. But for all the good that movement did, who wishes it hadn’t been more thought through?

At the most extreme end, the pro-paedophilia groups which fixed themselves among the gay and women’s rights movement not only seriously damaged those movements but demonstrated how hard it is to sort good claims from bad amid the stampede of the crowd. Likewise, the present événements are picking up claims which should be treated with deep suspicion.

Are we comfortable with the idea that whenever sexual interest is expressed it must be fully reciprocated at the risk, when declined, of utter ruin? We might expect people in public life to behave well, but are we certain that we want to create a situation where everyone there (however tenuously) must be either monogamous or celibate? Would the public like this morality to trickle down to them? The morality of the sexual revolution certainly did, so they can be assured that the effects of any counter-revolution will come to them too.

Worse lies beneath these presumptions. Not least the whipping up of fear and loathing between the sexes. A loathing familiar to male students who now appear to be treated as at best rapists-in-waiting.

Foremost propeller of this is a form of modern feminism which is in fact barely disguised misandry. Take an essay from the sociology professor Lisa Wade, which argues that ‘We need to attack masculinity directly. I don’t mean that we should recuperate masculinity — that is, press men to identify with a kinder, gentler version of it — I mean that we should reject the idea that men have a psychic need to distinguish themselves from women in order to feel good about themselves.’ Or, as Lara Prendergast has noted in this issue, other women writers have taken it upon themselves to issue strict instructions for men on how they must behave. This ‘feminism’ isn’t producing guides for helping men. It is producing manifestos for torturing them.

If we are to enter this strange new puritanical era, then at least let us not enter it silently. Allow it to be admitted that many women as well as men are happy to use their looks and wiles when these work to their advantage. It is not always victim-blaming, but a mere statement of fact that attractive people attract unusual amounts of attention and that not all find this a disadvantage. Actors and models of both sexes — as much as parliamentary assistants — know this and so does everybody else. And unless we decide that only a super-class of beautiful people are allowed to seek sex, we should accept that people in the lower to middling ranges of attractiveness should be allowed the odd punt too.

None of this justifies men in positions of power behaving like pigs towards people who work with them. If there is good to come from this then it would be in such behaviour being deemed more unacceptable than it has been. But sexual etiquette is not a science. It is improvisation in a very imperfectly set-up battlefield. Only at the most extreme end does the law have anything to say. Everywhere else we are talking about the exercise of manners. True, we may currently be rethinking those manners. But let us not do so in the midst of a moral panic, high on counter-revolutionary retribution. Or if we must, then let us still worry a little about where this stampede may yet take us.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 03, 2017, 04:37:28 PM
'Bout those people hoping for a return of HOUSE OF CARDS.....

"Eight ‘House of Cards’ Employees Accuse Kevin Spacey of Sexual Harassment, Assault

Eight people who worked on the set of the Netflix show House of Cards have accused Kevin Spacey of creating a “toxic” work environment by sexually harassing them, according to a report.

The eight people, who remain anonymous for fear of putting their careers in jeopardy, told CNN that Spacey exhibited “predatory” behavior towards young, male production staffers on the show that included vulgar comments and nonconsensual touching."
-------------------------------------------------------

Oops.  All this in the context of a UK police investigation into yet another allegation of rape:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4833833/kevin-spacey-uk-police-investigation-sex-act-claims-actor-london/ (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4833833/kevin-spacey-uk-police-investigation-sex-act-claims-actor-london/)

Meanwhile, an NYPD detective indicating there's more then enough evidence to charge Harvey with rape.  And I'm guessing he doesn't mean the plant he jacked off on.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4833833/kevin-spacey-uk-police-investigation-sex-act-claims-actor-london/ (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4833833/kevin-spacey-uk-police-investigation-sex-act-claims-actor-london/)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/02/eight-house-of-cards-employees-accuse-kevin-spacey-of-sexual-harassment-assault/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/02/eight-house-of-cards-employees-accuse-kevin-spacey-of-sexual-harassment-assault/)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/03/nypd-says-enough-evidence-arrest-harvey-weinstein-rape-allegation-hbo-star/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/03/nypd-says-enough-evidence-arrest-harvey-weinstein-rape-allegation-hbo-star/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on November 03, 2017, 04:49:49 PM
That was muh favorite show.  :-[  And of course it had to end on a cliffhanger.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 03, 2017, 05:47:25 PM
Sorry bro, that thing's dead as Dillinger.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 04, 2017, 05:54:59 AM
Netflix also says it will not complete post-production work on the film Gore, which Spacey produced and starred in.
https://t.co/hElC8HR0Dx


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 04, 2017, 01:25:31 PM
Whew, everything is falling, like some kind of....house of something...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 06, 2017, 03:23:04 PM
And Hollywood - somehow - got grosser:

"Richard Dreyfuss’ Son Claims Kevin Spacey Groped Him While His Father Was in the Room

Harry Dreyfuss, the son of actor Richard Dreyfuss, says Kevin Spacey groped him in 2008 when Spacey was directing Richard in the play Complicit at London’s Old Vic theater.

Harry revealed in a Buzzfeed article that he was 18-years-old when the alleged abuse took place in Spacey’s apartment.

“It happened one night when the three of us were alone in Kevin’s apartment rehearsing my father’s lines. My father didn’t see, and I didn’t tell him about the incident for many years,” Dreyfuss wrote. “Instead, I spent the next nine years telling people the story at parties for laughs.
--------------------------------

Which implies 2 things - one, that "I'm" Richard Dreyfuss did nothing after learning about the incident - at least nothing publically - and that no one else did either, in part because it's so par for the course.

Hopefully this will keep the PSAs telling America about anything down to a minimum in the next 5 years.... but I doubt it.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/06/richard-dreyfuss-son-claims-kevin-spacey-groped-him-while-his-father-was-in-the-room/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/06/richard-dreyfuss-son-claims-kevin-spacey-groped-him-while-his-father-was-in-the-room/)




Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 06, 2017, 03:43:19 PM
Well, come on now, what's a little ass-rape among colleagues?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 06, 2017, 03:53:44 PM
Well, come on now, what's a little ass-rape among colleagues?

An even nastier then usual felony?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 07, 2017, 01:22:12 PM
On hos - Sony pulls plugs on Spacey's ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD in an apparent nod to the gigantic irony of the title.

They will still go through with the wide release, because as usual, companies hate money.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/07/sony-cancels-festival-premiere-money-world-amid-kevin-spacey-sex-misconduct-scandal/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/07/sony-cancels-festival-premiere-money-world-amid-kevin-spacey-sex-misconduct-scandal/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 07, 2017, 06:38:31 PM
...And yet another famous Democrat accused of hanky-panky:
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Journalist-Accuses-Rev-Jackson-of-Sexual-Harassment-455879813.html (https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Journalist-Accuses-Rev-Jackson-of-Sexual-Harassment-455879813.html)

Don't worry Jesse, you're not alone - "Gossip Girl" actor Ed Westwick was accused of sexual misconduct after actress Kristina Cohen came forward via Facebook accusing him of rape.

Meanwhile, sources are saying Harvey will be charged with rape as early as next week.  I wonder if Meryl Streep will call him "God" when she visits him in the joint.... nah.

I can't wait for the next Hollywood PSA - it'll be the funniest film from there in decades.

http://toofab.com/2017/11/07/hollywood-harassment-ed-westwick-gossip-girl-rape-meryl-streep-dustin-hoffman-jane-seymour/ (http://toofab.com/2017/11/07/hollywood-harassment-ed-westwick-gossip-girl-rape-meryl-streep-dustin-hoffman-jane-seymour/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 07, 2017, 07:48:27 PM
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DN_jXDFVAAAqQF5.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 07, 2017, 08:04:00 PM
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DN_jXDFVAAAqQF5.jpg)


Also, you prolly shouldn't rape them. 


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 07, 2017, 08:59:24 PM
SHOULDN'T?!?!

SHIT!!!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 07, 2017, 09:58:21 PM
I'm just advising that one be proactive. Just about anything is rape if the accuser thinks it is, because vagina.

Don't get me wrong. I am enjoying that people are being hoisted on their own petards to some extent, but this simultaneously becoming an hysterical witch hunt.

Ron Jeremy is now being accused of some sort of lewd activity by some woman in porn.

When literal whores are accusing men they're paid to have sex with of having sex with them, it's getting ridiculous.

I'm talking to you, Ashley Judd. She literally offered herself as a whore to Weinstein if he got her an Oscar as payment, and she still wants to maintain her victim card.

Jeremy Piven has the right idea. Call these bitches out on their bullshit. Put up or shut up.

I hope some men successfully sue some of these bitches for all they've got.

Honestly, fuck all these people: the rapists, the pedos, AND the hypocritical cunt whores that beg for us the white knight for them. They can all go fuck themselves.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 07, 2017, 10:15:54 PM
https://youtu.be/jiwKTxqQwts


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 07, 2017, 10:36:09 PM
https://www.thewrap.com/gay-talese-rips-that-actor-that-ruined-kevin-spaceys-career-jesus-suck-it-up/ (https://www.thewrap.com/gay-talese-rips-that-actor-that-ruined-kevin-spaceys-career-jesus-suck-it-up/)

"Jeez, suck it up"

Probably not the best turn of phrase?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 07, 2017, 11:13:35 PM
https://www.thewrap.com/gay-talese-rips-that-actor-that-ruined-kevin-spaceys-career-jesus-suck-it-up/ (https://www.thewrap.com/gay-talese-rips-that-actor-that-ruined-kevin-spaceys-career-jesus-suck-it-up/)

"Jeez, suck it up"

Probably not the best turn of phrase?

Yeah. It should be, suck it DOWN.

(obviously)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 08, 2017, 12:08:56 AM
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Yls9NhwrwNQ/hqdefault.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 08, 2017, 06:13:12 PM
The rabbit hole deepens....

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4864917/inside-the-terrifying-nxivm-slave-cult-where-women-including-a-hollywood-actress-are-forced-to-hand-over-naked-pics-get-branded-with-the-founders-initials-and-are-beaten-with-paddles/ (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4864917/inside-the-terrifying-nxivm-slave-cult-where-women-including-a-hollywood-actress-are-forced-to-hand-over-naked-pics-get-branded-with-the-founders-initials-and-are-beaten-with-paddles/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 08, 2017, 08:03:30 PM
Speaking of deep holes, Corey Feldman just spilled the beans to LAPD:

"Corey Feldman filed a report with the Los Angeles Police Department. There is no further information at this time, and his report is being investigated,' a spokesperson told DaillyMail.com on Tuesday. Feldman revealed he had filed a report on Monday.

'IMPORTANT CAMPAIGN UPD8: I JUST COMPLETED A FORMAL SIT DOWN INTERVIEW W @LAPDHQ SPECIAL DIVISION, & GAVE THEM ALL THE INFO I KNOW! THIS WAS OFFICIALLY THE 1ST FORMAL REPORT EVER TAKEN ON ANY OF MY CASES, AS SBPD NEVER FOLLOWED UP BACK IN 1993, & HAS NO RECORD OF MY COMPLAINTS,' wrote an animated Feldman on Twitter.

He then added: 'THE LAPD WILL BEGIN AN OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION NOW! THINGS R HEATING UP, IM PRAYING 4 SAFETY!' "
------------------------------------------

Problem is that it's been decades since Feldman was of a bangable age, least are far as Hollywood's brave and courageous are concerned.  So doubtful there's any big, currently working, guys will be named.  But who knows?  Freaks will be freaks.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5060219/LAPD-confirms-investigating-Corey-Feldman-case.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5060219/LAPD-confirms-investigating-Corey-Feldman-case.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on November 09, 2017, 12:03:54 AM
Allegedly Charlie Sheen ass raped Corey Haim while they were making Lucas (1986).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5062721/Charlie-Sheen-sodomized-Corey-Haim-13-set-Lucas.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5062721/Charlie-Sheen-sodomized-Corey-Haim-13-set-Lucas.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 09, 2017, 02:37:09 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/CeysKho.gif)(http://fat.gfycat.com/RealisticMatureHoki.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on November 09, 2017, 02:35:10 PM
So now Ridley Scott has decided to remove Kevin Spacey from All The Money in the World and replace him with Christopher Plumber. I assume this will be done with reshoots against greenscreen with some digital removal and clean up as well. This story just gets stranger and stranger. This has been done before on The Crow and The Fast and Furious 7 but I don't think it's ever been done with a living actor who is now persona non grata.

http://deadline.com/2017/11/kevin-spacey-dropped-all-in-the-money-in-the-world-christopher-plummer-ridley-scott-j-paul-getty-1202204437/ (http://deadline.com/2017/11/kevin-spacey-dropped-all-in-the-money-in-the-world-christopher-plummer-ridley-scott-j-paul-getty-1202204437/)

Of course people have been recast while a movie was still in production. The Lord of the Rings comes to mind. But All The Money in the World comes out in less than two months. Someone in the comments also mentioned this story about the Howard Hawks movie Viva Villa!.

From wiki:
Lee Tracy's flourishing film career was temporarily disrupted on 19 November 1933, while he was on location in Mexico filming the Wallace Beery vehicle Viva Villa! According to the actor and producer Desi Arnaz, in his published autobiography The Book (1976), Tracy stood on a balcony in Mexico City and urinated down onto a passing military parade. Elsewhere in his autobiography, Arnaz claims that from then on, if one watched other crowds of spectators, they would visibly disperse any time an American stepped out onto a balcony. However, other crew members there at the time disputed this story, giving a sharply different account of events. In his autobiography, Charles G. Clarke, the cinematographer on the picture, said that he was standing outside the hotel during the parade and the incident never happened. Tracy, he said, was standing on the balcony observing the parade when a Mexican in the street below made an obscene gesture at him. Tracy replied in kind; and the next day a local newspaper printed a story that, in effect, Tracy had insulted Mexico, Mexicans in general, and their national flag in particular. The story caused an uproar in Mexico, and MGM decided to sacrifice Tracy in order to be allowed to continue filming there. The young actor Stuart Erwin replaced Tracy. The film's original director, Howard Hawks, was also fired for his refusal to testify against Tracy. Jack Conway replaced him.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 09, 2017, 03:10:32 PM
"So now Ridley Scott has decided to remove Kevin Spacey from All The Money in the World and replace him with Christopher Plumber. "

Couple of thoughts....

In one way, he had no choice.  To release the movie as is Spacey = yet another bomb for Ridley Scott, something he can ill afford.

Yet in another, are we seriously to believe that people in Hollywood didn't know this about him?  Nearly a dozen people from his last two jobs - the Old Vic and HOUSE OF CARDS - have accused him of misconduct (or worse).  One of the victims - Dreyfuss's kid - said he joked about it for years at parties.

Kinda tough sell that Scott, a 40+ year vet in the biz, didn't know Spacey was rapey.  There's a phrase in the law that seems appropriate - knew or should have known.  But this is more an executive producer decision, but I'm assuming Scott acted as such on this show.  It's a bad look for any show that cast him recently....

Far as replacing living actors, you forgot two of the most famous examples - James Remar being replaced by Michael Biehn in ALIENS (you can still see a couple of frames of Remar in a few shots), and Viggo relacing Stuart Townsend, again, weeks into the shoot.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on November 09, 2017, 03:21:49 PM
And now it looks like Louis C.K.'s career might be over. He canceled the premiere of his latest movie and an appearance on Colbert.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/louis-ck-accused-masturbating-front-multiple-women-ny-times-expos-1056601 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/louis-ck-accused-masturbating-front-multiple-women-ny-times-expos-1056601)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 09, 2017, 03:53:19 PM
Over?  Nothing is over until we decide it is!

Meh, jerkin the yurkin is bush league compared to most the other guys.  If Pee Wee can come back, so can LCK.... if this is all he's done.  There is a talent to crime ratio that most humans seem to accept - the bigger the talent, the greater the crime allowed.

And LCK is pretty dang funny.  As a side note, why do all these guys seem to want to jack off in public?  There's this little known invention called "the internet" whereupon can be found a medium called "porn."  These cats might want to do some investigating into it.

Poor Colbert - soon he'll have no guests left at all.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 09, 2017, 04:21:09 PM
You can't masturbate when just talking to women?

EVEN ON THE PHONE?

(https://i.imgur.com/t8evStO.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 09, 2017, 04:47:55 PM
Silly pants, of course you can diddle on the phone.... it's still a major industry in LA:

(http://brokelyn.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/phone-sex-ad.jpeg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 09, 2017, 06:03:17 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/uPb8YqyYijg


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 09, 2017, 06:19:25 PM
SO..... that's a work, right?

Also, not such a great look for him right now.  Or really ever.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 09, 2017, 06:29:42 PM
Masturbation is a human right.

The line must be drawn HERE!


Anyway, here's a handy dandy chart to figure out whether any given woman who makes criminal accusations over social media is full of shit.

(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNAtERmWkAA0dzc.png)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 10, 2017, 08:32:31 AM
Samwise backs Felman's story:

"Corey Feldman’s “Goonies” co-star Sean Astin is standing by his friend as Feldman comes forward with allegations of a Hollywood pedophile ring.

“Corey Feldman communicated to me at some point, what some of his experiences were. I remember aching for him . . . Victims of sexual assault are speaking. Their bravery and willingness to subject their lives to scrutiny, of the most painful kind, should be supported . . . It is time for abusers to be stopped.”


https://pagesix.com/2017/11/09/sean-astin-backs-corey-feldmans-sexual-assault-claims/



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: timmy2442 on November 10, 2017, 08:39:10 AM
Louis C.K. case is different form any one of these other instances for the simple reason that he *asked for*, and received, consent prior to jerkin it in front of these ladies.  If there was consent, it's just weird - but it definitely ain't assault. 


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 10, 2017, 08:40:28 AM
And half his standup is based on it.  I'm guessing there's gotta be a little something else to it.

That, or he really didn't want to do Colbert that night.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: timmy2442 on November 10, 2017, 02:05:23 PM
Louis C.K. releases statement.

Quote
“These stories are true,” C.K. says in a statement sent by his rep Lewis Kay. “At the time, I said to myself that what I did was okay because I never showed a woman my d–k without asking first, which is also true. But what I learned later in life, too late, is that when you have power over another person, asking them to look at your d–k isn’t a question. It’s a predicament for them. The power I had over these women is that they admired me. And I wielded that power irresponsibly.”

His full statement can be seen here:
https://pagesix.com/2017/11/10/louis-c-k-admits-to-sexual-misconduct-these-stories-are-true/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 10, 2017, 02:53:10 PM
He'll be forgiven.

(assuming nothing else drops)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 10, 2017, 03:22:18 PM
He fucked up with that statement. Never go full feminist by apologizing to the social justice crowd for your supposed transgressions against the faith. Your pathos, whether legit or not, will only function like a taste of blood does for a predator. It only gives them a sense of your weakness. They will only attack even more ferociously than before, and you're not likely to ever emerge with any sort of absolution, much less victory.

On the other hand, has he been fooling us all along with some sort of deep Andy Kaufman type anti-comedy and playing this "pathetic guy" character all the time? It does seem like it's both his whole shtick as well as his actual personal psychology. If he's been fooling us all along, that would really top Andy.

http://www.youtube.com/v/aCzmOknrN70


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 10, 2017, 04:56:34 PM
Nah. He didn't fuck up. He owned his shit. You know this is the best possible outcome from this scenario.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 10, 2017, 05:01:17 PM
Yeah, he'll be back on SNL w/in 2 years.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 10, 2017, 05:08:43 PM
He'll have another comedy special in a few years called 'What did I miss?' or something. The millionaire will be fine.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 10, 2017, 06:17:18 PM
He'll have another comedy special in a few years called 'What did I miss?' or something. The millionaire will be fine.

That's what his best move is. Don't grovel so much. Just let it blow over, as in telling women to blow you would probably be preferable to asking if you can whip it out and then jacking off in front of them.

Not saying I live in anything but a glass house, but he's an odd guy that seems to have real issues. Thing is, if he manages to overcome those issues and returns in a year or two as a healthier individual, it might be like a fat comic losing a bunch of weight and not being funny anymore since his pain was the prevailing basis for his comedy. Not saying that's all he is, but that seems to be a significant factor.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 10, 2017, 06:22:54 PM
Yeah. Smart move cancelling Colbert or whatever. No one should do 'WORLD APOLOGY TOUR 2017.'


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 14, 2017, 04:32:03 PM
And if you thought Tom Sizemore couldn't fall any lower....

"After an 11-year-old actress accused Tom Sizemore of violating her during a 2003 film shoot, the actor was told to leave the set and lost his high-powered CAA representation, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

The movie was the low-budget crime thriller Born Killers. According to people on the set, the alleged incident occurred while the actress was sitting on Sizemore’s lap. The two were posing for photos that would be used as a prop in the movie.

Robyn Adamson, who portrayed Sizemore’s wife, described what happened. She said the little girl’s “eyes got just huge, like she could’ve vomited. I was watching her. She soon reintegrated and kept going, although she had trouble taking direction. Later, when I was told about what happened, I knew exactly what it was.”

The following day, the casting director got a call from the girl’s mother, who told her that “when the girl put on her bathing suit, she told her mother that it reminded her of the day before, in an upsetting way — that the bathing suit’s contact against her felt like what happened when the man had put his finger inside her.”

Sizemore denied the allegation. The girl’s mother did file a complaint with the Screen Actors Guild. The film’s producers also claim they urged her to file charges with the police."
-------------------------------

Sadly, it's the drug use that got him banished, not the fingering of an 11 year old.

Priorities yo.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/14/saving-private-ryan-star-tom-sizemore-accused-violating-11-year-old-girl-2003/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/14/saving-private-ryan-star-tom-sizemore-accused-violating-11-year-old-girl-2003/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 16, 2017, 05:06:52 PM
...And two more, Stallone and Al Franken:

http://www.kabc.com/2017/11/16/leeann-tweeden-on-senator-al-franken/ (http://www.kabc.com/2017/11/16/leeann-tweeden-on-senator-al-franken/)

(http://images.tritondigitalcms.com/6616/sites/320/2017/11/15155723/leeann-airplane-pic.jpg)

Stallone:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5081605/Sylvester-Stallone-accused-forcing-teen-threesome.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5081605/Sylvester-Stallone-accused-forcing-teen-threesome.html)

The Stallone one sounds like total bullshit - Sly hardly needed to threaten anyone to get laid, then or now (and the "then" is 30+ years ago).  

The Al Frankin accusation - well, it happened recently and there's a picture, so yeah, it happened.  Not rape of course, but it yet again undercuts yet another Democrat politician who has been incredibly smug and preachy.

This is what Sly had his hands full of at the time...
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/14/15/46577C5500000578-5081605-image-a-7_1510673731857.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 16, 2017, 05:12:17 PM
Oh Al... I know your politics are ridiculous and your 'comedy' is awful, but Joy Behar?
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/11/AlJoy1-640x480.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 16, 2017, 06:13:17 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/-fbRGbUXwa8


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 16, 2017, 07:05:12 PM
...And the left/Hollywood has abandoned Al:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/16/celebs-call-al-franken-resign-groping-allegations/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/16/celebs-call-al-franken-resign-groping-allegations/)

That didn't take long, did it?  I'd say it'd all make for a fun Oscars, but Kimmel is still hosting so....

No.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 16, 2017, 07:06:15 PM
Death by a million hypocrisies.

Oh Al... I know your politics are ridiculous and your 'comedy' is awful, but Joy Behar?
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/11/AlJoy1-640x480.jpg)

His comedy did seem sort of cool and sophisticated when I was 9.

And at least Joy Behar is awake and apparently into it, unlike sleeping beauty here.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOxNxSEX4AABOd8.jpg)


We need to go after Sarah Silverman too. UNACCEPTABLE!

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/10/30/05/2DEE035500000578-0-No_surgery_Sarah_denied_having_breast_enlargement_surgery-m-75_1446181969707.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 16, 2017, 07:12:18 PM
I'm so old I remember a time when Sarah Silverman was vaguely attractive and funny...

Then dinosaurs died and nothing was ever the same.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 16, 2017, 08:03:04 PM
I'm so old I remember a time when Sarah Silverman was vaguely attractive and funny...

Then dinosaurs died and nothing was ever the same.

That she went full social justice with her ideology after hitting the wall didn't help the funny.

That does seem to be a pattern with female comedians though.

Correlation doesn't always causation, but it's almost as if those two things might be connected.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 16, 2017, 11:31:14 PM
Unlike the others here, Franken immediately issued an apology and didn’t try to defend his actions. What he did was shitty and he’s willing to accept the consequences.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/us/politics/al-franken-sexual-harassment-groping-forcible-kissing.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/us/politics/al-franken-sexual-harassment-groping-forcible-kissing.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 16, 2017, 11:43:39 PM
Did you actually read it?  'Cause his apology is caged in the form of "I did it as a joke".  So yeah, he kinda did defend his actions on that particular night.

Also, at least 2 other women have come forward with accusations, and if I might be so bold, I'd expect a few more.  And of course, Kevin Spacey did "apologize" too... but he's GAY!  So, it's cool scro.

A cynical person would say that Franken "apologized" because he didn't have a whole lot of choice.  He's literally leering at the camera as he's grabbing a passed out woman's tits.  Not sure that an apology issued only after a pic surfaces passes any sort of muster, other then to admit the obvious - he got caught.

The optics are bad as they say... especially when he tweeted out his silliness 2 weeks ago about punishing those acted like he has.  Relentless hypocrisy isn't terribly enduring in anyone, much less a blow hard politician.  

He's a bag of shit.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/al-franken-even-worse-than-you-think/article/2010505 (http://www.weeklystandard.com/al-franken-even-worse-than-you-think/article/2010505)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 17, 2017, 09:05:24 AM
(http://img27.laughinggif.com/pic/HTTP3N0cmVhbTEuZ2lmc291cC5jb20vdmlldzIvNDYyODE4My9haXJwbGFuZS1qb2hubnktby5naWYlog.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 17, 2017, 11:56:02 AM
Quote
Relentless hypocrisy isn't terribly enduring in anyone, much less a blow hard politician

I agree. All politicians should be punished for their crimes, regardless of political affiliation.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 17, 2017, 02:40:13 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/17/clinton-sanders-campaign-workers-claim-sexual-harassment/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/17/clinton-sanders-campaign-workers-claim-sexual-harassment/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 17, 2017, 04:00:27 PM
...And TED Talks is next up to bat:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-ted-talks-empire-has-been-grappling-with-sexual-harassment-interviews-and-internal-emails-show/2017/11/17/39f9374a-cae7-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?utm_term=.85d3a023ba6b (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-ted-talks-empire-has-been-grappling-with-sexual-harassment-interviews-and-internal-emails-show/2017/11/17/39f9374a-cae7-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?utm_term=.85d3a023ba6b)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 17, 2017, 04:30:47 PM
...And Gal Gadot tells Warner Brothers that either Brett Ratner goes, or she does:
https://pagesix.com/2017/11/11/gal-gadot-will-only-be-wonder-woman-again-if-brett-ratner-is-out/

It is too much to hope for that both of 'em are fired?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 17, 2017, 04:52:03 PM
Batting next, the creator of MAD MEN:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/marti-noxon-corroborates-matthew-weiner-harassment-allegations-calls-him-emotional-terrorist-1059502 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/marti-noxon-corroborates-matthew-weiner-harassment-allegations-calls-him-emotional-terrorist-1059502)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 17, 2017, 06:18:21 PM
President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho names names:
https://hotair.com/archives/2017/11/16/terry-crews-names-person-groped-plans-sue/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 18, 2017, 05:58:49 PM
Irony, defined:

Lena Dunham defend 'Girls' producer against rape allegation
https://pagesix.com/2017/11/17/lena-dunham-jenni-konner-defend-producer-against-rape-allegation/ (https://pagesix.com/2017/11/17/lena-dunham-jenni-konner-defend-producer-against-rape-allegation/)

Of course, she also is the definition of "bag of shit", so she's got lots going on.

And the HuffPost has turned on "Dirty" Uncle Joe Biden:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joe-biden-2020-harvey-weinstein_us_5a0a0ba8e4b00a6eece3a13e (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joe-biden-2020-harvey-weinstein_us_5a0a0ba8e4b00a6eece3a13e)

Gee, I don't see why.... oh wait
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/02/AP480928202452-640x480.jpg)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 19, 2017, 11:39:24 AM
And Stupid now regrets defending her producer accused of raping a minor:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/19/lena-dunham-sorry-defending-girls-producer-accused-raping-17-year-old-girl/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/19/lena-dunham-sorry-defending-girls-producer-accused-raping-17-year-old-girl/)

What. A. Butthole.

Speaking of buttholes, Russel Simmons & Brett Ratner accused of doing a rape together.  Stay classy Hollywood, stay classy:
http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-brett-ratner-russell-simmons-20171119-htmlstory.html (http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-brett-ratner-russell-simmons-20171119-htmlstory.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 19, 2017, 07:03:26 PM
Jeffery Tambor quits "Transparent" after sex allegations:

http://deadline.com/2017/11/jeffrey-tambor-leaving-transparent-sexual-harassment-allegations-amazon-jill-soloway-1202211711/ (http://deadline.com/2017/11/jeffrey-tambor-leaving-transparent-sexual-harassment-allegations-amazon-jill-soloway-1202211711/)

At this rate, there'll be no one left by the Oscars...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 20, 2017, 03:16:35 PM
Quote
Also, at least 2 other women have come forward with accusations, and if I might be so bold, I'd expect a few more. 

I write it here, it comes out there.....

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/al-franken-inappropriate-touch-2010/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/al-franken-inappropriate-touch-2010/index.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 20, 2017, 04:28:08 PM
The ultra left, insanely preachy New York Times just suspended their lead reporter for loving those titties so much.  No wonder they buried the Harvey story w/ cats like this....

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/20/16678094/glenn-thrush-new-york-times (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/20/16678094/glenn-thrush-new-york-times)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 20, 2017, 06:35:06 PM
SPEAKING of ultra liberal preachy reporters, Charlie Rose of PBS & CBS has just been suspended:

"Eight women say Charlie Rose sexually harassed them — with nudity, groping and lewd calls"

Gee, that didn't take long.  But as usual, please explain to me why you're morally and intellectually superior to people who don't vote the way you do.  It'll be fascinating.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/eight-women-say-charlie-rose-sexually-harassed-them--with-nudity-groping-and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.d9478994e062 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/eight-women-say-charlie-rose-sexually-harassed-them--with-nudity-groping-and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.d9478994e062)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 20, 2017, 06:36:41 PM
Hypocrisy is spreading like a wildfire isn't it? Burning all these f****** lefties alive. I love it.

Die commie scum.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 20, 2017, 06:43:21 PM
Hypocrisy is spreading like a wildfire isn't it? Burning all these f****** lefties alive. I love it.

Yes, but all on one side of the aisle.  Which is very inconvenient to their silly narratives, but the truth often is.

Ironically enough, my wife had asked minutes before who the next to fall would be.  I told her I didn't know, but I was positive that whoever it was, they voted for a power mad drunken hag loser....

And so it came to be.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 20, 2017, 08:56:58 PM
Hypocrisy is spreading like a wildfire isn't it? Burning all these f****** lefties alive. I love it.

Yes, but all on one side of the aisle.  Which is very inconvenient to their silly narratives, but the truth often is.

Ironically enough, my wife had asked minutes before who the next to fall would be.  I told her I didn't know, but I was positive that whoever it was, they voted for a power mad drunken hag loser....

And so it came to be.

Both you and your wife were in the room several months ago when I said that the supposedly noble motives of male feminists should be considered suspect.

The same thing is true for female feminists, but for different reasons.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 20, 2017, 09:11:14 PM
Quote
Both you and your wife were in the room several months ago when I said that the supposedly noble motives of male feminists should be considered suspect.

Well sure - a normal male will be all for feminism if it means they can fuck 50 women in a year.  That shit would never fly in the 1950s or back....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 21, 2017, 01:10:40 AM
But obviously a man adopting this strategy is not shielded from accusations, whether they're true or false. Young men aren't totally stupid, at least not all of them. The smarter "more eligible" among them had already gotten that message before this recent frenzy. Even the dumber ones are probably getting it at this point. This is may be a watershed moment in the culture. Not saying it's all bad but it may also present even more challenges for women seeking husbands as well, a trend that's been going on for our entire lives that's sped up in recent decades. If a woman wants to get a husband in 10 or 20 years, forget about it. You need to get a sperm doner then marry the state. But that gravey train is liable to dry up at some point as well.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 21, 2017, 01:44:53 AM
I figure WWIII will sort out a lot of problems...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 21, 2017, 07:32:17 AM
War can clarify things and get one's priorities squared away.

I am trying to picture that we're already there in order to focus.

Shockingly, it doesn't seem to require much imagination on my part.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 21, 2017, 08:01:55 AM
Your tax dollars at work -

"Michigan Rep. John Conyers, the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives, settled a wrongful dismissal complaint in 2015 with a former employee who alleged she was fired because she would not “succumb to [his] sexual advances.

...he repeatedly made sexual advances to female staff that included requests for sexual favors, contacting and transporting other women with whom they believed Conyers was having affairs, caressing their hands sexually, and rubbing their legs and backs in public.

[There was a] $27,000 Settlement out of Congressman’s Office Budget."
-------------------------------------

You get 3 guesses which party he's from, and the first 2 don't count.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/20/buzzfeed-she-said-that-a-powerful-congressman-harassed-her-heres-why-you-didnt-hear-her-story/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/20/buzzfeed-she-said-that-a-powerful-congressman-harassed-her-heres-why-you-didnt-hear-her-story/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 21, 2017, 09:22:00 AM
I guess Mike Cernovich broke the story and fed it to Buzzfeed. His article came out first though.

https://medium.com/@Cernovich/congressman-john-conyers-jr-sexual-harassment-buzzfeed-mike-cernovich-a699b8294212


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 21, 2017, 11:41:51 AM
Over 1/3 of American young adults think it's "always" or "usually" sexual harassment if a man who not a woman's romantic partner compliments her looks.

Around 1 in 8 young women say it's always or usually sexual harassment if he asks her out for a drink.

Nearly 1 in 4 young men say it's always or usually sexual harassment if he asks her out for a drink.


http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/11/daily-chart-14 (http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/11/daily-chart-14)

(http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/20171125_WOC925_0.png)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 21, 2017, 12:18:26 PM
Let me clarify; it's harassment when an undesirable man makes advances.

When a desirable, good looking man (like me, for example) makes advances, well then it's ok.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 21, 2017, 12:33:01 PM
I prefer the direct approach. Just ask for a price.

(http://i.imgur.com/v376aDG.gif)





Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 21, 2017, 01:34:17 PM
Sell them to me!

Sell me your children!!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 21, 2017, 03:14:20 PM
CBS fired Charlie Rose.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 21, 2017, 05:05:44 PM
Disney/PIXAR just put its CEO John Lasseter on a "leave of absence" for "you know what":

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/john-lasseter-taking-leave-absence-pixar-missteps-1057113 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/john-lasseter-taking-leave-absence-pixar-missteps-1057113)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 22, 2017, 06:48:38 AM
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPNdx-WVAAIyHNn.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 22, 2017, 01:11:56 PM
21st Century Fox reaches $90 million settlement in sexual harassment case
http://thehill.com/media/361318-21st-century-fox-reaches-90-million-settlement-in-sexual-harassment-case (http://thehill.com/media/361318-21st-century-fox-reaches-90-million-settlement-in-sexual-harassment-case)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 22, 2017, 01:29:17 PM
Congressman Overseeing Sexual Harassment Settlements Investigated By FBI For Campaign Fraud
http://www.newsweek.com/house-fraud-fbi-bob-brady-sexual-harassment-718954 (http://www.newsweek.com/house-fraud-fbi-bob-brady-sexual-harassment-718954)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 22, 2017, 01:51:26 PM
Representatives Gabbard and DeSantis say they're introducing legislation to unseal secret congressional sexual harassment settlements.

(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPQe5xAUMAAJlnB.jpg)  (http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPQe5xHUQAAqzF5.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 22, 2017, 01:59:14 PM
Olympic gymnastics and Michigan State University ex-doctor pleads guilty to sex charges
https://www.apnews.com/de31f08ab1fe435c88129d64bd1fbee4/Olympic-gymnastics-ex-doctor-pleads-guilty-to-sex-charges (https://www.apnews.com/de31f08ab1fe435c88129d64bd1fbee4/Olympic-gymnastics-ex-doctor-pleads-guilty-to-sex-charges)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 22, 2017, 04:14:04 PM
Three of the biggest show biz names so far - Harvey, John Lasseter, and Mark Halperin are/were long time Disney employees...  
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/11/DisneysMonstersInc-420x315.jpg)

The optics are bad as they say for the mouse-house.  Whether or not this will actually amount to anything at Disney remains to be seen, but in all 3 examples, the not so nice behavior of each was well known.

Oddly enough, this rather notable fact isn't being reported by the main stream media outlets - no surprise from ABC News as Disney owns them - but considering how left wing Disney has become, one suspects the lack of reporting on Disney's part of protecting pervs is not out of love for Disney's profit margin, but rather their politics.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/22/disneys-monsters-inc-harvey-weinstein-john-lasseter-and-mark-halperin/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/22/disneys-monsters-inc-harvey-weinstein-john-lasseter-and-mark-halperin/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 22, 2017, 06:00:40 PM
How do I get in on some of this sweet sweet sexual harassment money?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 22, 2017, 06:33:42 PM
How do I get in on some of this sweet sweet sexual harassment money?

Look like Rasida Jones (she had to quit TOY STORY so bad was Lasseter's pawings)
(https://media.gq.com/photos/5584736d09f0bee56443f75e/master/pass/women-2011-06-rashida-jones-rashida-jones-gq-june-2011-article.jpg)

(http://img.onlycelebrityfakes.com/image/thumb_jmqszl1av9.jpg)

(http://forums.eog.com/showthread.php/386766-Rashida-Jones-Nude-Rashida-Jones-Hot-Pictures?p=4768340)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 22, 2017, 09:03:45 PM
Quote
Also, at least 2 other women have come forward with accusations, and if I might be so bold, I'd expect a few more. 

I write it here, it comes out there.....

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/al-franken-inappropriate-touch-2010/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/al-franken-inappropriate-touch-2010/index.html)

And again..... again:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/al-franken-two-more-women-groping_us_5a15a455e4b09650540ec295 (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/al-franken-two-more-women-groping_us_5a15a455e4b09650540ec295)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 08:00:36 AM
...And NBC just straight up fired Matt Lauer for you know what:
http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/29/media/matt-lauer/index.html (http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/29/media/matt-lauer/index.html)

And yup, Lauer was a dyed in the wool liberal.  No wonder he described Bill Clinton’s sex scandals as mere “peccadillos”.  I'd say the number of scandals associated with libs is shocking.... but of course, it ain't.

Whatever Lauer did, it must've been pretty bad for NBC to straight up fire him.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/29/media/matt-lauer/index.html (http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/29/media/matt-lauer/index.html)

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2017/01/06/matt-lauer-20-years-bias-morning (https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2017/01/06/matt-lauer-20-years-bias-morning)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 29, 2017, 08:35:19 AM
Do you ever get the feeling you're being suckered into something?

I mean look, I'm not in favor of anyone getting fired over mere accusations, because that's bullshit for anyone.

BUT, if it's legit, then yes.

The problem though is how do you prove such a thing?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 08:57:15 AM
Oh I think where there's smoke there's fire, and that for most of the people in this thread, it's but the tip of the iceberg.  Does anyone seriously doubt at this point that Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey are very bad people?  Anyone think Bill & Hillary Clinton are paragons of virtue?  Or that John Conyers didn't grab every chick's ass he ever saw?  Cokie Roberts, the long time liberal reporter for ABC and NPR Blythely released a statement saying that "everyone knew women reporters should not to get in an elevator with Conyers."

Really Cokie?  You didn't think that the senior Democrat in Congress abusing every female reporter he ever got into an elevator with for decades was newsworthy?  Golly gee whiz, I'm betting if Conyers was a Republican that just might have made onto the news.  But of course when 99 out of a 100  sleaze balls are Dems, I guess it wouldn't pay to report it (and the actual percentage is much more lopsided, at least by judging by the last 2 months of news).

Never mind that John Conyers was an awful politician, one who literally did nothing for his constituents and much to hurt them, that he's also a molester that then used our tax payer money to hush up his victims looks to be par for the course for these people.  A sad fact which might not be true if reporters - the vast numbers of which are liberals - did their jobs.  

Pro tip - when you're throwing your weight behind people who wear "pussy hats" and preach & screech to people about morality, it's probably a good idea not to get caught with your dick in places it shouldn't be.   For decades.  By dozens of women/young boys.  It's a bad look as they say.

Yet virtually everyone on this list did exactly that.  This isn't just about about scandals by powerful bad people doing bad things - although it is certainly that - it's also about the rank and raw hypocrisy.  

It's about their systematic defense of one another that has caused, without a shadow of doubt, many more innocent people to get abused down through the years all while projecting their own evils onto their political opponents.

https://hotair.com/archives/2017/11/28/cokie-roberts-women-reporters-knew-not-get-elevator-conyers-alone/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on November 29, 2017, 09:05:38 AM
Do you ever get the feeling you're being suckered into something?

I mean look, I'm not in favor of anyone getting fired over mere accusations, because that's bullshit for anyone.

BUT, if it's legit, then yes.

The problem though is how do you prove such a thing?

Don't cuck out to feminism. It won't save you. Cuck lives don't matter.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 09:09:30 AM
Quote

Don't cuck out to feminism. It won't save you. Cuck lives don't matter.

No lives matter to these folks.  If you're not cop you're little people, so to speak.

And yeah - this is the bed modern feminists have made for themselves; these are the heroes and leaders and icons they themselves have chosen.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 29, 2017, 10:13:01 AM
Do you ever get the feeling you're being suckered into something?

I mean look, I'm not in favor of anyone getting fired over mere accusations, because that's bullshit for anyone.

BUT, if it's legit, then yes.

The problem though is how do you prove such a thing?

Don't cuck out to feminism. It won't save you. Cuck lives don't matter.

No, what I mean is:  Is this TOO much of a good thing?  Im always suspicious when these things start happening en masse.

I'm hoping that it actually IS what it appears to be.

But I've been burned before.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 10:41:00 AM
Quote
No, what I mean is:  Is this TOO much of a good thing?  Im always suspicious when these things start happening en masse.

Too much?  Nah - look, if nothing else a bunch of self-righteous shit-heels are no longer in positions to do further harm.  As noted before, well over a hundred politicians and entertainment leaders have gone down since Harvey.   That every single one of them - quite literally - are liberals is instructive.

And I mean truly instructive. 

Let's take today's most recent example (as there could well be more before the day is out) in Matt Lauer.  For 2 decades he protected and promoted democrats, starting with the simply awful Bill Clinton all the way up to attacking Trump on one the biggest media outlets on the planet.  During those years of promoting an agenda, he was sexually assaulting multiple women. 

Is anyone shocked?  They sure shouldn't be.  Yet today's news about Lauer still serves to under cuts every single thing he promoted and protected in those 2 decades - from Hillary Clinton to global warming, his agenda - and the left's - must come under greater scrutiny, and so it has.  So a positive good.

His disgrace is also NBC's, and not just for enabling his sexual "peccadillos" but also for his naked, idiot, brand of politics.

The notion that democrats project their own sins has been proven time and again at this point - so much so that it's all but undeniable even from the left itself.  It's also beyond a shadow of doubt just how skewed the media has become - again something that was debated/denied until fairly recently by the left.

The left's most powerful figures, from Harvey to Bill to Conyers to Charlie Rose to Matt Lauer have all done exactly what they preached against; what they ran their careers "protecting".  Americans - traditionally sensitive to hypocrisy - can't but help to notice that virtually all the names in these scandals are from a certain political party.

So a positive good.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 29, 2017, 11:35:12 AM
Quote
No, what I mean is:  Is this TOO much of a good thing?  Im always suspicious when these things start happening en masse.
The notion that democrats project their own sins has been proven time and again at this point - so much so that it's all but undeniable even from the left itself.  It's also beyond a shadow of doubt just how skewed the media has become - again something that was debated/denied until fairly recently by the left.


That's what I mean; why are they suddenly giving Lauer the shaft all of a sudden when in the past they would have totally protected him?

What's the endgame?

I mean, again, I HOPE it's what it looks like, but.....that should show you just how paranoid I am.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 12:50:15 PM
No end game - the jig is up.  Trying to pass people like Charlie Rose & Matt Lauer as objective, honest reporters is a bit like trying to pass dog shit off as candy.

Can't very well have John Lassetter and Harvey Weinstein abuse every half decent looking chick they come across for decades and try to claim Disney is a family friendly company.

You can hardly shriek about the evils of Republicans while John Conyers, Al Franken, Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner, Kwame Kilpatrick (to name but a few) all have sex scandals - some going back decades.  And that's without getting into their particular brand of politics, which beyond the lunacy of their economic schemes, seem to rely solely on dividing Americans.  Telling us how fully one half of the country is racist, deplorable, and irredeemable... All while raising taxes.

Apparently preaching so loudly and so long about the wickedness of their opponents all the while raping little boys, molesting women, wrecking health care, the economy, and practicing a ruinous foreign policy all while acting holier than thou has rubbed some people the wrong way.  Fancy that.

In the end of course it remains about money and power and trying to hold onto it - certainly it has nothing to do with morals.  It's clear now to even the dumbest members of the media and their politicians that the window lickers in Ohio and the mouth breathers in Wisconsin have had enough.  It's one thing to lie, cheat, rape, and steal - quite another to be self-righteous while doing it.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 01:06:49 PM
Quote
Let's take today's most recent example (as there could well be more before the day is out) in Matt Lauer.

Wow!  In yet another example of the JDV-domus saying it here and coming out there, say goodbye to Garrison Keillor for you know what:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2017/11/29/garrison-keillor-fired-alleged-improper-behavior-minnesota-public-radio/905491001/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2017/11/29/garrison-keillor-fired-alleged-improper-behavior-minnesota-public-radio/905491001/)

Which makes the Washington Post look even dumber then usual for posting Keillor's op-ed piece yesterday that it was "absurd" that Al Franken would be pressured to resign over some groping allegations.

Absurd huh?  kinda like the WaPo and Keillor were defending a scuz-bag even though they know he's a scuz bag but he's on their side so it's cool scro.

But don't you worry folks, there's yet another liberal power-house losing their job today - David Sweeny, the head of NPR's news division, was just fired for you know what:
https://pjmedia.com/blog/liveblogevent/wednesdays-hot-mic-35/entry-218000/ (https://pjmedia.com/blog/liveblogevent/wednesdays-hot-mic-35/entry-218000/)

I'm sensing a pattern here.

Apparently working for NBC, NPR, or a Democrat Senator or Congressman is the same as working for an off-the-books strip club.  The only real question is will the firings stop today at a mere 3, or will yet another long time know it all liberal get canned for not keeping his pants on?  The day is young as they say....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 29, 2017, 02:09:35 PM
Et tu, Garrison, et tu?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on November 29, 2017, 02:22:37 PM
I always disliked the phony twerp Matt Lauer and never understood why he was the highest paid anchor. I especially hated him after this infamous interview with Tom Cruise where he defended shock therapy, antidepressant drug use, drugging of children with Ritalin, and psychiatry as a whole. But that was his job, to spread propaganda and promote corporate greed. Tom Cruise of all people had to tell him on air what a journalists job is actually supposed to be. Good riddance to bad garbage.

http://www.youtube.com/v/tFgF1JPNR5E?t=8m11s


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 03:18:27 PM
I forgot all about that Tom Cruise episode.  Pretty clear that like the rest of his ilk, Matt Lauer is a...

Bag of shit.

NBC - beyond being a propaganda machine for the democrat party - has a serious problem.  Two months ago they shot down the Ronan Farrow investigation into Harvey Weinstein (ie- NBC could have broke the story long before anyone else did); two weeks ago they fired their head of booking for you know what; Andrea Mitchell claimed that matter-of-factly on air that Bill Clinton's rape of Juanita Broaddrick was “discredited” when nothing could be further from the truth; they "analyzed" the pic of Al Franken grabbing the woman's tits and claimed it was “not actually groping"; and now their highest paid, most powerful anchor, Matt Lauer is fired for a multitude of bizarre sexual behavior.

Naturally, all this will make its way on to SNL this week...  Or not.  Stay classy NBC.

https://pagesix.com/2017/11/14/nbc-news-fires-top-talent-booker-for-inappropriate-conduct/ (https://pagesix.com/2017/11/14/nbc-news-fires-top-talent-booker-for-inappropriate-conduct/)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/why-ronan-farrows-harvey-weinstein-bombshell-did-not-run-nbc-1047671 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/why-ronan-farrows-harvey-weinstein-bombshell-did-not-run-nbc-1047671)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/11/20/nbcs-mitchell-smeared-broaddrick-discredited-blasts-trump-official-roy-moore/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/11/20/nbcs-mitchell-smeared-broaddrick-discredited-blasts-trump-official-roy-moore/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 29, 2017, 07:41:34 PM
Obligatory Land of the Lost post.
(https://peoplebranch.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/mattlauer.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 07:44:31 PM
Under-rated flick.  Very stoner friendly.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 29, 2017, 07:50:07 PM
Maybe we should revisit that land on friday...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2017, 08:14:11 PM
Yes.  Perhaps we should....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on November 29, 2017, 08:19:28 PM
I'll be sure to bring it.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 30, 2017, 01:40:53 PM
Russell Simmons accused by Sidney Lument's daughter of rape:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/writer-jenny-lumet-russell-simmons-sexually-violated-me-guest-column-1062934 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/writer-jenny-lumet-russell-simmons-sexually-violated-me-guest-column-1062934)

While a 5th accuser has come forward against Al Franken - this time, an army vet while in a combat zone:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/30/fifth-accuser-army-vet-claims-al-franken-groped-2003/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/30/fifth-accuser-army-vet-claims-al-franken-groped-2003/)

While Nancy Pelosi has done a 180 and says John Conyers should quit.... even as 3 more women come forward.  Conyers responded through his attorney, "Get fucked honkey"... or words to that effect.

In Conyers defense, all the victims were white so it shouldn't matter, 'cause as white woman they are lying devils.  

That's exactly what liberal democrat congressman James Clyburn said yesterday.  Can't make it up:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/29/rep-james-clyburn-claims-john-conyers-accusers-may-not-be-credible-because-white-compares-them-to-infamous-child-murderer/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/29/rep-james-clyburn-claims-john-conyers-accusers-may-not-be-credible-because-white-compares-them-to-infamous-child-murderer/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 30, 2017, 06:27:05 PM
Tom Hanks on it all:

"The 61-year-old A-list actor — who is set to appear next alongside Meryl Streep in the upcoming Steven Spielberg-directed Pentagon Papers film The Post — told the Hollywood Reporter in an actor’s roundtable published Thursday that it all comes down to why people get into the entertainment business in the first place.

“There are some people who go into this business because they get off on having power,” Hanks explained. “And the times they feel the most powerful, which is why they went into the business, are when they are hitting on somebody who’s underneath them, [and] I don’t necessarily mean completely sexually.”

“There are predators absolutely everywhere,” he added."
--------------------------------------------

Yet, as much as I respect Hanks, he does not name names; does not say who he would or would not hire.

And that of course is part and parcel of how the bad people in the movie business, news-tainment, and politics remain in places of power and influence.  Hanks also had this to say:

"I think eventually everybody who has a production office is going to have a code of ethics and behavior. If you don’t follow these, you will not work here,” he said. “And that’s not necessarily going to be a bad thing."
---------------------------------------

Eventually?  I mean if it's clear that virtually everyone in power in Hollywood is a sex pervert, so much so that you need a separate production office to police the bad behavior, why not now?  

To be clear, Hank's statement today is an admission from one of the most powerful people in show business that show business is off the rails.

The other aspect of this issue is an inescapable one - the same scuz bags that get into showbiz to "get off on having power" as Hanks puts it, also universally support the Democrat party in an incredibly public way.  It isn't just that they vote for the likes of Obama and Hillary and Franken - they donate hundreds of thousands of dollars while raising millions more.  The make PSAs and join protests.  They publically demand the handful of Republicans accused of misconduct to immediately resign without applying the same standards to the hundreds - if not thousands - of high powered democrats who do far worse.

None of this can be debated.  The real question is a simple one - can morality ever return to Hollywood?  One thing is certain - despite remaining the poster child of how not to act, they will continue to tell the rest of America how to.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 30, 2017, 08:00:12 PM
Disney better hope that STAR WARS flick makes a lot of bread - looks like they might need it:

"Disney Knew: John Lasseter Issued ‘Handler’ to Protect Female Staffers from Harassment

To protect staffers from John Lasseter’s alleged predations, the Pixar chief was assigned a “handler to ensure he would not engage in inappropriate conduct with women, two people with direct knowledge of the situation,” told Deadline.

Deadline believes this is “evidence Disney may well have been aware of troubling behavior on the part of the digital animation pioneer.”
------------------------------

Stay classy Disney.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/30/disney-knew-john-lasseter-issued-handler-protect-female-staffers-harassment/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/30/disney-knew-john-lasseter-issued-handler-protect-female-staffers-harassment/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 01, 2017, 06:34:38 PM
"Arrow/The Flash/Legends/Supergirl Showrunner Fired for Sexual Harassment

The Flash and Supergirl producers Warner Bros. Television has cut all ties with Andrew Kreisberg following sexual-harassment claims from multiple women involving the showrunner....

"After a thorough investigation, Warner Bros. Television Group has terminated Andrew Kreisberg’s employment, effective immediately," WB said in a statement.

Nineteen men and women, all of whom chose to remain anonymous, came forward to accuse the showrunner of sexual misconduct, including inappropriate touching, which took place over a period of several years. Many are current or former employees of the shows Kreisberg executive produced. Kreisberg allegedly touched people and kissed women without consent and asked for massages from female staff....

Kreisberg is said to have created a "toxic" work environment with many insiders fearing retaliation if they filed a complaint against him. (He also has routinely fired the writing staff from The Flash every season and this year had trouble staffing the show and challenges hiring women, sources say.)"
-----------------------------

You can bet this bleeds over....

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/supergirl-flash-showrunner-andrew-kreisberg-fired-sexual-harassment-claims-1057390?utm_source=twitter&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/supergirl-flash-showrunner-andrew-kreisberg-fired-sexual-harassment-claims-1057390?utm_source=twitter&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 01, 2017, 08:33:09 PM
It's shocking that attractive women would be attracted to men who wield power and display social dominance and that men would be motivated to acquire power and social dominance in order to attract attractive women. Absolutely shocking.

We'll just go back to male actors playing all the female roles. The women can all stay at home at pump out kids. Problem solved.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 01, 2017, 09:33:59 PM
It's shocking that attractive women would be attracted to men who wield power and display social dominance and that men would be motivated to acquire power and social dominance in order to attract attractive women. Absolutely shocking.

We'll just go back to male actors playing all the female roles. The women can all stay at home at pump out kids. Problem solved.

I like where your head is at.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 04, 2017, 03:09:06 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/sheryl-sandberg-warns-metoo-backlash-143526977.html (https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/sheryl-sandberg-warns-metoo-backlash-143526977.html)

Even feminist billionaire Sheryl Sandberg is realizing that the deluge of hysterical #MeToo accusations could be perceived as an out of control witch hunt. Her proposed solutions, however, are inane and nonsensical. She likely still refuses to acknowledge that actual false accusations are widespread and numerous and given far too much credence at the expense of justice. Truth be damned if it throws shade on her ideology, an ideology which actively and consistently flushes due process down the toilet. According to her, men need to just ignore the raging fire in the furnace ahead of them and just jump right in. You at least need some sort of massively profitable incentive that's worth that risk, honey.

Quote
The solution certainly isn’t the so-called Pence rule ― the vice president reportedly will not dine alone with another woman unless his wife is present ― as some have suggested. Instead, Sandberg writes, men should strive to treat colleagues and employees equally. If you won’t dine or drink alone with a woman, then you shouldn’t do it with a man either.

Apparently people who are the focus of a witch hunt may indeed take defensive measures to avoid being scooped up in it. Go figure.

You've gotta ask yourself one question, "Do I feel lucky?"

Men are bound to think  to themselves, "Don't lean in. Lean out.  Save yourself."



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 04, 2017, 03:52:16 PM
Well sure - but of course they've been shrieking "eek, a rapist!" now for over a decade on colleges campuses now, and it hasn't hurt a thing..... Or not.

In any event, a goodly number of the people on this list are gay child molesters - which presumably has nothing to do with feminism run off the rails.  Hey, speaking of gay child molesters, this headline today at the NY Post:

"The Metropolitan Opera suspended legendary conductor James Levine on Sunday after The Post exclusively reported that the classical music maestro had allegedly molested a teen boy in the 1980s.

Officials revealed the move in a statement, as two more alleged victims have come forward and accused the 74-year-old of sexual abuse.

“The Metropolitan Opera announced today that it is suspending its relationship with James Levine, pending an investigation,” the statement said."
----------------------------------------------

There's no more opera at the Met.

https://nypost.com/2017/12/03/met-opera-suspends-famed-conductor-accused-of-molestation/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 04, 2017, 04:18:47 PM
Well, there's probably a whole lot more chicks not gettin laid these days.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 04, 2017, 05:06:05 PM
Well, there's probably a whole lot more chicks not gettin laid these days.

Getting laid is not their prime concern. It's more the getting attention, validation, protection, and resources from higher value men that they're gonna miss.

As the Fixx once said, one thing leads to another.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 04, 2017, 09:28:03 PM
 Hey, speaking of gay child molesters...

Bryan Singer fired from the Freddie Mercury story “Bohemian Rhapsody".

One wonders how Fox could have ever thought him a proper choice in the first place.  I mean beyond the obvious distastefulness of him banging children, he can't direct his way out of a paper bag.

http://www.showbiz411.com/2017/12/04/another-one-bites-the-dust-x-men-director-bryan-singer-fired-from-freddie-mercury-queen-movie (http://www.showbiz411.com/2017/12/04/another-one-bites-the-dust-x-men-director-bryan-singer-fired-from-freddie-mercury-queen-movie)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 05, 2017, 04:30:23 AM
Yeah, it does seem like the club is collapsing, doesn't it?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 05, 2017, 08:05:22 AM
Looks like the NY Ballet won't let the NY Opera have even one whole day to itself in the news:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/arts/dance/peter-martins-new-york-city-ballet.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/arts/dance/peter-martins-new-york-city-ballet.html)


At this point I wonder if there is any liberal arts organization without sex abuse.  Do as they say, not as they do....

On second thought, that's a bad idea too.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 05, 2017, 08:36:42 AM
Speaking of liberals you shouldn't listen to...

"Journalist accuses Rev. Jesse Jackson, director John Singleton of sexual harassment"

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rev-jesse-jackson-john-singleton-accused-sexual-harassment-article-1.3617222 (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rev-jesse-jackson-john-singleton-accused-sexual-harassment-article-1.3617222)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 05, 2017, 08:39:23 AM
Speaking of liberals....

John Conyers announces he won't run again even as another accuser comes forward:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/congressman-accused-sexually-harassing-staffer-cousin-article-1.3677768 (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/congressman-accused-sexually-harassing-staffer-cousin-article-1.3677768)

Thank God for small favors.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 05, 2017, 08:56:11 AM
Speaking of sleazy liberal congressmen who wpaid off sexual abuse accusers with tax payer money....

"House Settled Lawsuit After Meeks Fired Staffer Who Reported Sexual Assault Related To Donor

The Office of House Employment Counsel brokered a settlement in 2006 over allegations that Rep. Gregory Meeks fired a staffer in retaliation for reporting that she was sexually assaulted at a business tied to a campaign contributor, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned."
-------------------------------

Which we paid for.

Man alive, I've been up for a half hour and not one, not two, not three, not four, but five new stories of liberals who can't keep their hands to themselves - and that doesn't count the late breaking stories last night about the Met and Bryan Singer.  By God, what will the number be at by noon? 

Truly staggering is both the sheer number of sleaze bags of a liberal bent, and the now completely obvious covering up for them for decades. 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/house-settled-lawsuit-after-meeks-fired-staffer-who-reported-sexual-assault-related-to-donor/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/house-settled-lawsuit-after-meeks-fired-staffer-who-reported-sexual-assault-related-to-donor/)






Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 08:06:36 AM
Quote
Truly staggering is both the sheer number of sleaze bags of a liberal bent, and the now completely obvious covering up for them for decades. 

The New York Times agrees - their report today claims that Hillary & Bill protected Harvey...

"Former President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton were key players in a Democratic cover-up of former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s sexual assault, The New York Times detailed in an exclusive report Tuesday.

Two prominent women in media told TheNYT that they personally warned Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2016 that Weinstein was a known sexual assaulter and that it was highly unwise to be so closely connected with him."

...'cause money.  And complete lack of moral compass.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/05/nyt-bill-and-hillary-were-weinsteins-celebrity-shields/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/05/nyt-bill-and-hillary-were-weinsteins-celebrity-shields/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 06, 2017, 11:44:09 AM
Oh there's a moral compass, it just points the wrong way.

Speaking of which.....breaking news:

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/harvey-weinstein-weinstein-co-face-160437942.html?soc_trk=gcm&soc_src=7563eca7-14c1-3a20-ab16-782788cde33a&.tsrc=notification-brknews (https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/harvey-weinstein-weinstein-co-face-160437942.html?soc_trk=gcm&soc_src=7563eca7-14c1-3a20-ab16-782788cde33a&.tsrc=notification-brknews)

Harvey Weinstein, Weinstein Co. Face Class-Action Racketeering Lawsuit Over Sexual Harassment

The mountain of litigation stemming from allegations of sexual harassment and assault against Harvey Weinstein continues to grow. On Wednesday, six women filed a proposed class-action lawsuit in federal court in New York against the disgraced film producer and his former companies, claiming that the system that exposed them to harassment from Weinstein was akin to organized crime.

“Harvey Weinstein is a predator. Bob (Weinstein) knew it. The board knew it. The lawyers knew it. The private investigators knew it. Hollywood knew it. We knew it. Now the world knows it,” the plaintiffs said in a joint statement. The six plaintiffs are: Louisette Geiss, Katherine Kendall, Zoe Brock, Sarah Ann Masse, Melissa Sagemiller, and Nannette Klatt.

“We have watched with horror, amazement, pride and gratitude in the last two months as women (and men) the world over have come forward and named their abusers. We stand with all those brave people who have had the courage and temerity to shine a spotlight into the darkness. Predators thrive in the shadows. It is only by keeping their secrets for them that we allow them to get away with it,” the statement said.

The suit, handled by Hagens Berman and Armenta Law Firm, aims to expand as a class-action proceeding with potentially “hundreds” of other Weinstein victims, the firms said in a statement.

According to the suit, “Weinstein’s widespread sexual misconduct did not occur without the help of others,” the suit states. “Rather, over time, Weinstein enlisted the aid of other firms and individuals to facilitate and conceal his pattern of unwanted sexual conduct. This coalition of firms and individuals became part of the growing ‘Weinstein Sexual Enterprise,’ a RICO enterprise.”

The 14 counts in the suit include witness tampering, mail and wire fraud, assault, civil battery, negligent supervision and retention and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiffs are seeking a jury trial.

Also named as defendants are the Weinstein brothers’ former company, Miramax, and current and former board members of Weinstein Co.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 12:56:36 PM
Also, least 2 other women have come forward with accusations, and if I might be so bold, I'd expect a few more. 

Member when I wrote that?  And thus it has come to pass.  Agayn...  Agayn.... Agayn...

"A seventh accuser has come forward against disgraced Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), this time with the claim that in 2006, when he was a radio host, Franken tried to kiss her against her will.  “It’s my right as an entertainer,” is what she said Franken told her."
------------------------------

BAWHAHAHAHAHA!  I mean, naturally Franken, the renown defender of women's right and all things liberal has finally agreed to step down. 

Just kidding.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/06/seventh-accuser-longtime-democrat-says-disgraced-sen-al-franken-tried-forcibly-kiss/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/06/seventh-accuser-longtime-democrat-says-disgraced-sen-al-franken-tried-forcibly-kiss/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 01:02:47 PM
According to the suit, “Weinstein’s widespread sexual misconduct did not occur without the help of others,” the suit states. “Rather, over time, Weinstein enlisted the aid of other firms and individuals to facilitate and conceal his pattern of unwanted sexual conduct. This coalition of firms and individuals became part of the growing ‘Weinstein Sexual Enterprise,’ a RICO enterprise.”

Hey, speaking of covering up and enabling shitheads all whilst telling us who not to vote for based on morality, there's an ever growing mountain of info that NBC knew for years that Matt "I loves da pussy" Lauer was using his job to "get some":

"Last week the New York Post reported that during the decade-plus he was a top NBC executive, Zucker (who now runs CNN) received complaints about Lauer’s predatory behavior towards women.

Zucker of course denies everything, saying he knew and heard nothing about the man he hired, groomed, and oversaw as a top NBC executive for over a decade.

“No one ever brought to me, or to my knowledge, there was never, there was never a complaint about Matt,” Mr. Zucker said at a business conference last week. “There was never a suggestion of that kind of deviant, predatory behavior. Not even a whisper of it, nothing like that.”

Not even a whisper of it.

And yet, here is that very same Jeff Zucker at Matt Lauer’s Friars Club roast in 2008, while he was still an executive at NBC News … and when he was certain no one was watching:

“It’s just good to see Matt up here and not under my desk,” Zucker said from the podium. “I don’t want to say Matt is a germophobe, but he’s the only guy I know who uses Purell both before and after he masturbates.”

Martha Stewart at that same event, “I hear NBC executives call Matt the ‘Cock of the Rock.’”
-------------------------------

Gee, sanctimonious and an enabler?  It's the best of everything!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/12/06/everybody-knew-cnns-jeff-zucker-nbc-execs-roasted-ck-rock-lauer-08/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/12/06/everybody-knew-cnns-jeff-zucker-nbc-execs-roasted-ck-rock-lauer-08/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 01:34:24 PM
And hey, speaking sleazy liberal "news" personalities, John Conyers won't be alone in the unemployment line locally - channel 7 just suspended Malcolm Maddox for you know what:

(https://mediaassets.wxyz.com/photo/2015/03/24/Malcom%20Maddox_1427246169721_15510491_ver1.0_640_480.jpg)

https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2017/12/06/sexual-harassment-anchor-malcom-maddox-wxyz/926643001/ (https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2017/12/06/sexual-harassment-anchor-malcom-maddox-wxyz/926643001/)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 06, 2017, 02:33:18 PM
I think they should have realized something was up when his Twitter account handle was #DrDickenstein M.D. (My Dick)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 03:20:26 PM
For the last two months now, we've been averaging what, 3 or 4 noted democrats a day being scandalized?

The one GOPer - Roy Moore - is also the only one running for office (and thus motivation for dems to sink him).  It's also notable that the "accusations" are from nearly a half century ago... and don't involve boys or rape of women.  Also notable is the total lack of evidence plus contradictory statements from his accusers, all who seem to be looking for a pay day.  Put simply, Moore will win overwhelmingly next week despite a massive amount of out of state money being spent, a clear indication that people in Alabama don't believe the allegations.

Compare that to every other name on this list, and the sheer disparity in party affiliations is staggering, yet utterly believable.  

The acts themselves are bad, but far worse is that every single one of the perps dared to preach morality to fellow Americans.  They dared to judge other people while committing far nastier acts.  They told us who to vote for and condemned anyone who disagreed with them.

They're all...

BAGS OF SHIT.

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81ehY4g5KxL._SY355_.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 06, 2017, 03:39:37 PM
It would have been funnier if there was a song on that album called 'Bags of Shit', or if that was the name of the album.

As it is, it's a pretty decent album.

Glass Houses, I mean, not 'Bags of Shit' which I don't think is an album?

I found one on Google, but it really didn't seem worth the time to investigate.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 03:57:59 PM
Just listened to "the Nylon Curtain", one of the more under-rated albums from the '80's...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 06, 2017, 06:00:05 PM
Glass Houses' "All for Leyna" taught me not to be Captain Save A Ho.

I, of course, didn't listen.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 06:14:10 PM
...and an 8th accuser comes forward on Franken:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/06/8th-accuser-al-franken-groped-media-matters-party-furing-first-obama-inauguration/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/06/8th-accuser-al-franken-groped-media-matters-party-furing-first-obama-inauguration/)

Buh bye stupid!  Maybe you can write a sequel to your idiot "Liars" book titled "Dumb-fucks".

It'll be an autobiography.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 06, 2017, 09:00:28 PM
The desire to police language is apparently biting some women in their...

Well, let's just say, "Be careful what you wish for."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/06/facebook-bans-women-taking-part-metoo-campaign-writing-men-worst/ (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/06/facebook-bans-women-taking-part-metoo-campaign-writing-men-worst/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 09:24:56 PM
Yeah, facebook - ain't it the best?

And speaking of just the best, John Conyer's son - who Conyer's suggested yesterday should replace him in Congress - was busted earlier this year for body slamming his girlfriend to the ground then stabbing her with a knife.  Oddly enough, he still hasn't been charged with a crime.

Almost like his fellow dems in Detroit were protecting him.  Huh.

John Conyers - always giving Michigan the very best leadership possible.  And hey, keep up the democrat party's good name junior.

Hey, any tips on who I should vote for President, or how to score chicks?
(http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/John-Conyers-III.jpg-e1512596435677.png)

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/06/john-conyers-iii-allegedly-body-slammed-his-girlfriend-and-cut-her-with-a-knife/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/06/john-conyers-iii-allegedly-body-slammed-his-girlfriend-and-cut-her-with-a-knife/)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 06, 2017, 09:40:49 PM
Maybe politics just isn't in the cards for junior.

But who knows? It's the D.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 06, 2017, 09:44:11 PM
Maybe politics just isn't in the cards for junior.

But who knows? It's the D.

Dems will prolly make him party chairman, what with his tough stance on mouthy bitches and presumed love of giant deficits.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 07, 2017, 12:31:34 PM
Franken quitting the Senate, as every dem had turned against him.

But don't worry Fraken fans, Al's not quitting stupid.  No sir, he's practically massaging the breasts of dumb as he slammed Roy Moore and Trump and on the way out the door.  'Cause that stings.  Also, he managed one more lie as late last night he was still denying that he was resigning today.  

Not done being a moron, Franken then called himself ‘Champion of Women’ even as he was quitting his job for sexual harassment of women, thus doubling the quotient of stupid for the planet in a single sentence.

One good thing for Franken -  NBC News has a new opening on the Today Show he'd be perfect for.

What a...

BAG OF SHIT.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQdXQNRUIAA7nJ1.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on December 07, 2017, 04:37:52 PM
If only every politician accused of sexual impropriety had the integrity to remove themselves.

Imagine if everyone were held to such standards.

I guess we can only dream.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 07, 2017, 06:32:14 PM
Listen and believe.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 07, 2017, 06:47:36 PM
If only every politician accused of sexual impropriety had the integrity to remove themselves.

Integrity and Al Franken - HA!  That mighty defender of women accused his accusers of lying even as every dem in the Senate showed him the door, so radioactive was his "integrity".

How about we just get rid of those rightfully accused?  One thing, and one thing only sank Franken - that picture of him grabbing a passed out woman's tits while aping for the camera.  Without it, he's still a Senator (despite the now 7 accusers).  In other words, smoking gun evidence of something that happened recently carries far much more weight then 40 year allegations with zero evidence.

Hows about we use a case by case standard?  Cokie Roberts said every female reporter knew not to get into an elevator with John Conyers.  She - nor anyone else - said boo about it until it was too late to save him... or the women who didn't have a choice but to get into that elevator.

There is also has to be a believably standard applied.  When women accuse Stallone and Trump of molesting them, it's a lot harder sell for me because these men a) have always been married to beautiful women, and b) would seemingly find it very easy to get other women to be mistresses.  

By that standard it's very easy to believe the bad things said about Bill Clinton & John Conyers, ain't it?
(http://photos.metrotimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/04_Monica-Conyers.jpg)
(https://assets.rbl.ms/14235407/980x.jpg)

And so too you must look at the length of time between accusations and the actual supposed event.  Roy Moore's accusers said nothing for nearly a half century - only saying something when millions of dem dollars poured into Alabama in an bald attempt to sway the election.  The accusers against Trump & Moore only unveiled themselves when the polls started to swing against their opponents, something that is mighty hard to ignore.

And of course the allegations against Moore - "he touched my breast" - are hardly the same as those levied against people like Clinton & Franken.  Moore by all accounts has been happily married for over 3 decades.... something that I doubt Clinton and Franken could claim truthfully.

But then again truth ain't dems strong point, is it?

Let us compare Moore's accusers - who are all now in there 70's - versus women who are still in their 30's who have made accusations against Clinton/Conyers/Franken based on things that have happened this century - and I think distinctions can readily be made there as well.  So too were the bad acts done by Clinton/Conyers/Franken done while in office as men in their late 40's or older.  Moore was 32 when he supposedly grabbed a booby and wasn't a politician.  Kinda big differences, especially as Franken/Conyers/Clinton all seemed to change for the worse.

Still another major distinction can be made regarding Moore & Trump vs the hundreds of democrats that have fallen - Trump, and presumably Moore, both won despite the allegations, meaning a plurality of voters did not believe them.

It's hard to believe Al Franken would win today if he were to run.  Indeed, he only won by a couple of hundred under what I'll just call suspicious circumstances.  I know Minnesotans are dumb, but they're not that dumb.

So too one must consider what happened to accusers after they've only come forward in an attempt to swing voters minds.  What, exactly, did happen to the Trump accusers?  Can you name one?  Have they sued him?  Have there been charges filed?  Do they continue to go on TV to explain what happened?  'Cause Bill Clinton's accusers certainly have.  When accusers vanish once their jobs have finished, it rather undercuts their stories, wouldn't you say?

Speaking of motivation, all of the democrat politicians accused have been accused by.... fellow democrats.  In non-election years.  Which - again - would seem to carry more weight then the democrats who magically appear against republicans only when elections seem in jeopardy... accusers who soon disappear once their usefulness is done.

What about believably of the people involved, or their track record?  Bill Clinton impeached for lying - which he obviously did.  About nearly everything.  Even this very day, Franken denied doing anything wrong (as he did during his initial "apology") even as he declared himself a "champion" of women while calling his women accusers liars.  Meanwhile, Roy Moore was a judge never accused of crimes of moral turpitude.  Never had to quit his job because of grabbing someone's tits on camera.  In all the years of Trump's business, his reputation was sound - which is of course how he stayed in business.

Franken was the deciding vote on Obamacare.  Conyers took part in taking Detroit from "Paris of the midwest" to the murder capital of the world.  While being married to a felon.  While recommending his son - who stabbed his girlfriend this year - for his seat.  

So yes, it is appropriate to gauge each man by the totality of circumstances... but subtly has never been a liberal strong point (ie - you're a racist/sexist/homophobe if you don't vote for me!!!!!!).  To wit, this is an ad run today by dems in Alabama:
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/12/Doug-Jones-Ad-420x315.jpg)

But hey, I'll trade every GOPer accused - all two of 'em - against the closing in on 200 with more sure to come liberals.  I think Mike Pence - who was mocked earlier this year by liberals for saying he is never alone with a woman who is not his wife - would be a great President.

And by your standard, you should too.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 07, 2017, 10:09:12 PM
Bryan Singer accused of raping a 17 year old boy:

"The alleged victim, Cesar Sanchez-Guzman, accused the director of forcing him to perform oral sex. According to the suit, which was filed in state court in Seattle, the director then forcibly performed oral sex on Sanchez-Guzman and then anally penetrated him."

Again, is anyone shocked?  How this piece of shit kept getting gigs is absolutely ridiculous.

http://variety.com/2017/film/news/bryan-singer-cesar-sanchez-guzman-1202633573/ (http://variety.com/2017/film/news/bryan-singer-cesar-sanchez-guzman-1202633573/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 07, 2017, 10:25:04 PM
Probably because when he takes the helm, he churns out Gold baby.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 07, 2017, 10:30:53 PM
Probably because when he takes the helm, he churns out Gold baby.

And now we know why they'll abandon him - X-MEN APOCALYPSE (shivers)....
https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-X-Men-Make-Major-Franchise-Changes-Apocalypse-67424.html (https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-X-Men-Make-Major-Franchise-Changes-Apocalypse-67424.html)

'Cause boy fuckin' is just fine to these maniacs.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 08, 2017, 08:10:14 AM
One other quick note about Franken - beyond slamming the women for "remembering wrong because of emotions" - he's not actually resigning.

Yup, he's going to wait for an "ethics committee" to decide.  After Roy Moore wins, despite Franken's "sacrifice" - and every other dirty trick in the book - Ima guess old Al ain't going anywhere.

Anyone wanna bet a Coke?

Meanwhile, another democrat hack has been fired by a bank for you know what.  Harold Ford jr, former dem congressman and commentator on MSNBC has apparently been grabbing too many cookies.  Will NBC - or the dems - have anyone left to put on air in 2018?

I can't wait for him to tell me who to vote for & how racist I am - do tell!
(http://www.eurweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/HaroldFordMSNBC-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 08, 2017, 02:31:19 PM
...And it's Dustin Hoffman's turn:

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/12/DustinHoffmanBroadwayAccuser-640x480.jpg)
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/12/08/photo-another-woman-accuses-dustin-hoffman-sexual-misconduct/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/12/08/photo-another-woman-accuses-dustin-hoffman-sexual-misconduct/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 08, 2017, 03:15:57 PM
...And Roy Moore's primary accuser admitted today that she lied:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/08/bombshell-roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-yearbook/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/08/bombshell-roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-yearbook/)

This is the same lady who lost a divorce case.... in front of Roy Moore while he was a judge.

Nope, no motivation there!  I'd say she has a serious lack of integrity, wouldn't you?

To make matters even more slimy, ABC News coached her on what to say.  On camera.  Stay classy ABC, stay classy. 

Man, integrity ain't what it used to be.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 09, 2017, 01:59:47 PM
(http://rs87.pbsrc.com/albums/k135/gt_ironman/s33e4fa850000_2_16126.jpg~c200)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 11, 2017, 05:39:24 PM
Another NPRer:

"Boston (AP) -- The host of one of National Public Radio's most successful programs has been placed on leave while he's investigated for allegations of wrongdoing including engaging in "creepy" sex talks and unwanted contact with 11 mostly young women and men.

The allegations against "On Point" host Tom Ashbrook include unwanted hugs and neck and back rubs to other people associated with the show. They were contained in a document and confirmed in multiple interviews by WBUR-FM, the Boston station that produces the show."

and Larry King:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5156899/Larry-King-groped-claims-Eddie-Fishers-ex-wife.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5156899/Larry-King-groped-claims-Eddie-Fishers-ex-wife.html)

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-11/longtime-npr-host-ashbrook-facing-misconduct-allegations (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-11/longtime-npr-host-ashbrook-facing-misconduct-allegations)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 11, 2017, 06:24:16 PM
(https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/abznx1B_700b.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 11, 2017, 08:28:15 PM
Mike Pence is a very smart man....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 11, 2017, 08:33:15 PM
...Meanwhile, another liberal reporter fired for you know what:

"New Yorker Fires Star Reporter Ryan Lizza Over ‘Improper Sexual Conduct’

Whew - for a second, I though maybe we wouldn't make it to 3 names for a 24 hour period.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-new-yorker-severs-ties-with-star-reporter-ryan-lizza (https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-new-yorker-severs-ties-with-star-reporter-ryan-lizza)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on December 11, 2017, 09:07:44 PM
HAH! LIBRULZ!!!!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 11, 2017, 09:17:50 PM
HAH! LIBRULZ!!!!

Well, they're consistent at least.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on December 12, 2017, 10:19:56 AM
Spoiler alert! All political affiliations have huge pieces of shit in them.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 12, 2017, 03:44:38 PM
Spoiler alert! All political affiliations have huge pieces of shit in them.

Of course, spoiler alert, one political affiliation has disproportionately more pieces of shit...

As this now two month old thread proves beyond a shadow of doubt.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on December 12, 2017, 04:13:57 PM
Oh, I'm PLENTY aware of the political party with disproportionately more pieces of shit. Almost everyone is. :D


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 14, 2017, 01:20:07 AM
And yet another piece of shit on the disproportionately full left side of the scale, PBS's Tavis smiley, has been suspended for you know what:

"Effective today, PBS has indefinitely suspended distribution of 'Tavis Smiley,' produced by TS Media, an independent production company," the public broadcaster said. "PBS engaged an outside law firm to conduct an investigation immediately after learning of troubling allegations regarding Mr. Smiley. This investigation included interviews with witnesses as well as with Mr. Smiley. The inquiry uncovered multiple, credible allegations of conduct that is inconsistent with the values and standards of PBS, and the totality of this information led to today's decision."

The investigation found that Smiley had engaged in sexual relationships with multiple subordinates. Some witnesses interviewed expressed concern that their employment status was linked to the status of a sexual relationship with Smiley. In general, they described Smiley as creating a verbally abusive and threatening environment that went beyond what could be expected in a typical high-pressure work environment. Several expressed concerns about retaliation."
--------------------------------------

Don't worry, Tavis ain't alone - music mogul Russell Simmons being accused of rape:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/13/arts/music/russell-simmons-rape.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/13/arts/music/russell-simmons-rape.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur)

Well, at least liberals only had two big names drop today.  Baby steps man, baby steps.

Meanwhile, the original piece of shit Harvey Weinstein is being accused by Selma Hayek of threatening her with murder... and of course sex abuse.

http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/tavis-smiley-pbs-1202639424/ (http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/tavis-smiley-pbs-1202639424/)

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sexual-misconduct/salma-hayek-says-harvey-weinstein-forced-her-do-sex-scene-n829406 (https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sexual-misconduct/salma-hayek-says-harvey-weinstein-forced-her-do-sex-scene-n829406)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 14, 2017, 05:36:53 AM
In fairness, I would have probably sexually harassed Selma Hayek too.....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 14, 2017, 03:32:15 PM
These women have all filed police reports and aren't talking about their cases in public. Right?

No?

Then they're full of shit until proven otherwise.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 14, 2017, 03:53:19 PM
These women have all filed police reports and aren't talking about their cases in public. Right?

Well, at least for Harvey, plenty have.  Multiple reports on both sides of the Atlantic indicates plenty of charges coming forth sooner than later.

I think there's a bigger issues then whether or not a government entity is capable of doing good public work - clearly not modern government's strong point - but rather why people like Hayek, who at that point in her career was quite famous and presumable wealthy - chose not to immediately disclose the bad behavior to everyone she knew, including the press and the police.  It's one thing for a young actor trying to break into the biz keeping their mouth shut, it's quite another for a star to do the same.

I suppose part of is because that's just how corrupt Hollywood is, and everyone knew it and don't dare buck the system.  But clearly some of it is lack of personal conviction and some form of cowardice is part of it too.

None of these people are heroes, and none of them - including the famous victims who were content to let it go on - are particularly noble or righteous.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 14, 2017, 05:46:22 PM
And more accusations for Dustin Hoffman:

"Dustin Hoffman Accused of Exposing Himself to a Minor, Assaulting Two Women (EXCLUSIVE)

Cori Thomas was in high school when she says Dustin Hoffman exposed himself to her in a hotel room. Melissa Kester was a recent college graduate when Hoffman allegedly sexually assaulted her while recording audio for the film “Ishtar.” A third woman, who asked to remain anonymous, said that Hoffman assaulted her in the back of a station wagon and manipulated her into a subsequent sexual encounter that left her traumatized.

Speaking to Variety, the women described predatory incidents involving Hoffman that fit into a pattern of alleged behavior that has emerged in the wake of previous sexual-misconduct claims against the now 80-year-old actor."
---------------------------------------

Whether or not Hoffman will face charges for being a horrific actor remains to be seen... but he should.

http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/dustin-hoffman-2-1202641525/ (http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/dustin-hoffman-2-1202641525/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 14, 2017, 08:37:18 PM
Women in politics fear #MeToo moment will backfire — and they’ll be the ones punished
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article189152134.html (http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article189152134.html)

(https://coedmagazine.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/you-dont-say.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 14, 2017, 08:42:05 PM
Yeah, a little late to be thinking about that, ain't it?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 14, 2017, 08:58:44 PM
Women in politics fear #MeToo moment will backfire — and they’ll be the ones punished
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article189152134.html (http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article189152134.html)
Female staffers and lobbyists who returned to the Capitol last week for pre-session meetings discovered many male legislators will no longer meet with them privately. Accustomed to Tallahassee’s Southern culture, where men and women casually and routinely greet each other with hugs, legislators are doing an awkward dance to replace a hug with a handshake. And the fear of retaliation — against women who brought forward allegations or those who may in the future — is as raw as the fear that legislators’ political enemies could turn sexual harassment claims into new political weapons.

“I had a senator say, ‘I need my aide here in the room because I need a chaperone,’ ” said Jennifer Green, a veteran lobbyist, after meeting with a senator in his Capitol office to discuss a client’s issue. “I said, ‘Senator, why do you need a chaperone? I don’t feel uncomfortable around you, do you feel uncomfortable around me? ‘Well,’ he said, ‘anyone can say anything with the door shut.’ ”


Yeah, a little late to be thinking about that, ain't it?

Oh, yeah. We're going back to chaperones, gentleman callers, old maids, and finishing schools.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 14, 2017, 09:14:53 PM
"Oh, yeah. We're going back to chaperones, gentleman callers, old maids, and finishing schools."

Kinda nice actually.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 14, 2017, 09:25:34 PM
"Oh, yeah. We're going back to chaperones, gentleman callers, old maids, and finishing schools."

Kinda nice actually.

Well, that's the best case scenario. Not really what feminists want since it was basically feminism that dismantled it all in the first place.

Feminists will typically insist on screeching that it's all "misogyny" no matter what men do.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 15, 2017, 05:36:29 AM
See what happens when uteruses go unused?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on December 15, 2017, 10:29:23 AM
I assume you meant to say "vaginas?"


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 15, 2017, 07:12:07 PM
I assume you meant to say "vaginas?"

I think the place a baby forms is a little more important to it than the hole it usually exits from.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 15, 2017, 07:14:11 PM
I assume you meant to say "vaginas?"

No sir I'm meant uterus. You see any woman can get out there and get laid and not necessarily be happier for it.

 it's not a matter of unused vaginas. It's unused uteruses.  Of course it's just an opinion and like assholes everyone has one.

=D



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 15, 2017, 08:28:58 PM
I assume you meant to say "vaginas?"

No sir I'm meant uterus. You see any woman can get out there and get laid and not necessarily be happier for it.

 it's not a matter of unused vaginas. It's unused uteruses.  Of course it's just an opinion and like assholes everyone has one.

=D



Men "objectify" women based on the appearance of fertility.

Women "objectify" men based on resources and power.

All because babies.


When a beautiful woman who has little power and resources of her own attempts to seduce a man with power and resources, it's perfectly acceptable.

When a man with power and resources attempts to seduce a beautiful woman who has little power and resources of her own, it's an atrocity and time to call Gloria Allred.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 15, 2017, 11:00:04 PM
Is it ever REALLY time to call her?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on December 16, 2017, 06:27:22 PM
Stephen Henderson, Free Press writer/managing editor, has been fired for you know what. If any of you listen to Detroit Today on WDET you would know that he is the worst DJ in radio so hopefully they fire him too. I have actually written to the station asking them to do so in the past.

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20171215/news/647821/stephen-henderson-fired-by-detroit-free-press-over-inappropriate (http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20171215/news/647821/stephen-henderson-fired-by-detroit-free-press-over-inappropriate)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 16, 2017, 07:12:38 PM
The very epitome of a preachy, hypocritical democrat.  This is what stupid had to say about the GOP exactly 24 hours before he was fired:

 “The party is willing to indulge just about any repugnant point of view in a candidate or public official – racism, religious discrimination, disrespect for the Constitution – in order to achieve its political aims.”

Project much there Stephen?  Boy, that left side of the scale is getting full of Courics, huh?  

(http://montrealfilmjournal.com/img/picb/A0000186.jpg)

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/16/editor-who-bashed-the-gop-just-got-fired-for-alleged-sexual-harassment/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/16/editor-who-bashed-the-gop-just-got-fired-for-alleged-sexual-harassment/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 17, 2017, 02:06:21 PM
Speaking of loudmouth liberal shit, it looks like NBC's Chirs Matthews may be in a world of shit....

"NBC Made Payment To Staffer After Sexual Harassment Claim Against Chris Matthews

An MSNBC spokesman confirmed Saturday the company made a separation-related payment to one of Chris Matthews employees after the woman complained about sexual harassment.

Two sources familiar with the situation told The Daily Caller that Matthews paid $40,000 to settle with an assistant producer on his show, “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” in 1999 after she accused him of harassment. "
------------------------

Sexual harassment of women?  At NBC?!?!  No.... I can't believe it.  Matthews is one of the biggest blow hards at NBC, once saying Obama "sent a thrill down his leg".  So much for being objective.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/16/nbc-made-payment-to-staffer-after-sexual-harassment-claim-against-chris-matthews/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/16/nbc-made-payment-to-staffer-after-sexual-harassment-claim-against-chris-matthews/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 18, 2017, 12:51:12 AM
“The inspiration behind the Women’s March on DC, Linda Sarsour, has been accused of enabling the alleged sexual assault and harassment of a woman who worked for the feminist activist.”

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/17/linda-sarsour-accused-of-enabling-sexual-assault-against-woman-who-worked-for-her/ (http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/17/linda-sarsour-accused-of-enabling-sexual-assault-against-woman-who-worked-for-her/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2017, 07:23:36 AM
Oh now that's a sweet sweet early Christmas present.  Hypocrisy, thy name is liberal.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 18, 2017, 08:36:25 AM
Its not sexism when THEY do it.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2017, 08:34:54 PM
One other quick note about Franken - beyond slamming the women for "remembering wrong because of emotions" - he's not actually resigning.

Yup, he's going to wait for an "ethics committee" to decide.  Ima guess old Al ain't going anywhere.

Anyone wanna bet a Coke?

When Swami-Vincent says it, it happens...
https://hotair.com/archives/2017/12/18/dem-senators-second-thought-maybe-franken-stay/

So... when Al "not my fault if the bitch's memory is wrong" Franken stays, can we permanently be done with any notion that he's noble or has a shred of integrity?  'Cause that'd be great.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 18, 2017, 08:46:58 PM
May or may not apply in this particular instance, but it's not a bitch's memory you're worried about when the words flying out of her mouth don't align with reality. It's usually a desire to avoid accountability or acquire resources.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2017, 08:49:30 PM
May or may not apply in this particular instance, but it's not a bitch's memory you're worried about when the words flying out of her mouth don't align with reality.

In this instance, I'm pretty sure their words comport with reality....
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/314/837/9cf.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 19, 2017, 08:17:25 PM
This popping up all around Hollywood....
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/12/DRbuF0FUQAANfso-1024x1024.jpg)

Which is apparently because Streep was the only one in Hollywood who didn't know about Harvey:

"It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent decades when he proceeded to attack others,” Streep said in a statement to the Huffington Post.

“I wasn’t deliberately silent. I didn’t know,” she added. “I don’t tacitly approve of rape. I didn’t know. I don’t like young women being assaulted. I didn’t know this was happening.”

Streep — who referred to Weinstein as “God” while accepting a Golden Globe in 2012 — has previously claimed that many people in Hollywood did not know the extent of Weinstein’s behavior.
-------------------------

The only real question is how many Oscars Streep will win for being brave, standing up to that mean old McGowan and all.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/12/19/she-knew-artist-calls-out-streep-weinstein-posters/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/12/19/she-knew-artist-calls-out-streep-weinstein-posters/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 19, 2017, 11:33:12 PM
Rape should be legal.

I'm for vag neutrality.

Vaginas should not be considered private property.

There's no such thing anyway.

Vaginas should be designated as a public resource.

A woman shouldn't be able to throttle back the usage of any vagina.

So give it up, bitches.

It's for the public good.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 28, 2017, 03:36:31 PM
Buzzfeed just fired a reporter for you know what....
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/12/28/fired-buzzfeed-white-house-reporter-45th-member-elite-media-accused-misconduct/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/12/28/fired-buzzfeed-white-house-reporter-45th-member-elite-media-accused-misconduct/)

45 big name reporters/producers fired from the liberal media.  Gee golly, who better then them to get news and opinions from?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 28, 2017, 08:27:19 PM
And yet another weirdo has been fired from NBC:

"A prominent employee with CNBC has been accused of using a hidden camera to spy on his teenage nanny.

According to The New York Daily News, 44-year-old Dan Switzen, director of “The Suze Orman Show,” is accused of placing a camera inside a tissue box in the bathroom of his New York home.

Law enforcement sources say the camera was discovered on Nov. 13 after two of the 18-year-old live-in nanny’s friends came over to Switzen’s residence.

The teens took the camera to Pleasantville police at around 7:50 p.m. that evening where “cops found incriminating images on its memory card.”
---------------------------

Stay classy NBC.

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/cnbc-director-accused-of-spying-on-teen-with-hidden-bathroom-camera_122017 (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/cnbc-director-accused-of-spying-on-teen-with-hidden-bathroom-camera_122017)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 28, 2017, 08:37:47 PM
The Great American Perv Putsch?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 31, 2017, 03:40:46 PM
It's all about men competing for social dominance and a shot at reproduction with the youngest, most fertile women. Male femininists are just guys with an angle on that. (The female ones have an angle too, of course. It's just more solely of an enslavement of men angle. Both are short-sighted.)

http://www.youtube.com/v/HjojBUsTzG0


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 04, 2018, 06:16:06 PM
And yet another preachy lib accused of you know what:

"CBS News Political Director is 52nd Member of Elite Media Accused of Misconduct

CBS News fired Political Director Steve Chaggaris over allegations of “inappropriate behavior.” Chaggaris is the 52nd member of the elite media fired, suspended, or accused of misconduct.

“In the last two weeks, accounts of inappropriate behavior by Steve Chaggaris were brought to our attention and were immediately investigated,” CBS said in a statement Wednesday. “As a result, CBS News has severed ties with Mr. Chaggaris for violating company policy, effective immediately.”
---------------------

CBS perhaps the most vocal big media mouthpiece of the democrat party, all but openly campaigning for Hillary last year while lionizing Barry O.  Ironically enough, it was CBS that was interviewing Barry for a puff piece when he said that there would be no domestic Islamic attacks... even as the San Bernardino terror attack was taking place.  Strong work boys.

Also ironic, being a blow hard pussy hat wearing piece of shit who's fired for sexual harassment.  It's been a tough four months for the mainstream media.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/01/04/cbs-news-political-director-52nd-member-elite-media-accused-misconduct/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/01/04/cbs-news-political-director-52nd-member-elite-media-accused-misconduct/)


Title: Re: Hhttp://www.crowboy.com/evilgenius/forum/index.phparvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 04, 2018, 06:42:24 PM
...And speaking of liberal weirdo icons, here's some more nasty shit about Woody Allen:

"I read decades of Woody Allen’s private notes. He’s obsessed with teenage girls.

Allen’s work is flatly boorish. Running through all of the boxes is an insistent, vivid obsession with young women and girls: There’s the “wealthy, educated, respected” male character in one short story (“By Destiny Denied: Incident at Entwhistle’s”) who lives with a 21-year-old “Indian” woman. First, Allen’s revisions reduce her to 18, then double down, literally, and turn her into two 18-year-olds. There’s the 16-year-old in an unmade television pitch described as “a flashy sexy blonde in a flaming red low cut evening gown with a long slit up the side.”

There’s the 17-year-old girl in another short story, “Consider Kaplan,” whose 53-year-old neighbor falls in love with her as the two share a silent, one-floor-long elevator ride in their Park Avenue co-op. There’s the female college student in “Rainy Day” who “should not be 20 or 21, sounds more like 18 — or even 17 — but 18 seems better.” with misogynist and lecherous musings."
-----------------------------------------------------

But hey, at least they're girls.  So he has that going for him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-read-decades-of-woody-allens-private-notes-hes-obsessed-with-teenage-girls/2018/01/04/f2701482-f03b-11e7-b3bf-ab90a706e175_story.html?utm_term=.394ec68a3498 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-read-decades-of-woody-allens-private-notes-hes-obsessed-with-teenage-girls/2018/01/04/f2701482-f03b-11e7-b3bf-ab90a706e175_story.html?utm_term=.394ec68a3498)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on January 04, 2018, 07:11:40 PM
Men are most attracted to sexually mature women in their prime years of fertility?

Shocking.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 04, 2018, 07:56:37 PM
Men are most attracted to sexually mature women in their prime years of fertility?

Shocking.

Well....

It's one thing to look at an 18 year old and go "Damn!" it's quite another to constantly fantasize about them to the point of being.... Woody Allen.  I mean the "barely legal" life style seems a bit crass when you're 70.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on January 05, 2018, 10:29:45 AM
Men are most attracted to sexually mature women in their prime years of fertility?

Shocking.

Well....

It's one thing to look at an 18 year old and go "Damn!" it's quite another to constantly fantasize about them to the point of being.... Woody Allen.  I mean the "barely legal" life style seems a bit crass when you're 70.

Yeah. It's not an exact science, but there is a point where the line is crossed into degeneracy and things start getting weird.

But, thanks to feminism, it's frowned upon to shame a young woman for excessive gold digging and obsessing over a geriatric man for his money and status and offering him sex in exchange for said money and status. You're now only supposed to be able to shame the rich geriatric man for obsessing over such women and taking them up on their offers. But if he closes the deal, she is considered to be either "exercising her sexual autonomy" or "raped," the only difference being whether or not she feels like taking credit or being held accountable for her actions afterward. And why should she voluntarily be choose to be held accountable for anything is she's losing nothing and gaining everything? The man is still demonized as, at least, a lech.

Maybe we should cover the women head to toe with black sheets so no man is allowed to gaze upon them without women's permission. That'll fix it.

Or maybe... Were there ever social rules to govern these things, like some sort of cultural ritual that gave a man eternal consent to engage in sexual congress with a young woman in exchange for his provision of resources toward her and any of the offspring that resulted? I think it was called marriage, but that's been ruined since the woman has now been "liberated" from absolutely any obligations or accountability within it. The man is now expected to let her do anything she feels like while all the accountability still falls upon him. He's powerless and is expected to continue to not complain and be remain continuously enslaved for her benefit. If she refuses to fuck him anymore and instead chooses fuck an array of other dudes, he's expected to submit to even this arrangement. The enlightened, intellectual man is supposed to have no problem with such a deal, even to the point where she uses the feminist kangaroo courts to kick him out of his own house and pay her money forever.

Something had to give at some point.

Being a vocal "ally" and offering periodic sums to the Church of Feminism in order to absolve you of your indulgences no longer functions as a shield. It was inevitable that feminist women would eventually bite the hands of their male feminist enablers. Like the scorpion on the frog's back, it's her nature, just as it is the nature of men to compete with other men for reproductive access to them best females, to the point of literal mortal combat if necessary. Without functional incentive structures, the whole system falls apart.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 05, 2018, 03:09:37 PM
Make it the 53rd liberal media icon to fall for you know what....
https://www.annistonstar.com/free/star-s-chairman-former-publisher-resigns/article_aba7e7f4-f1a4-11e7-99f6-fb901d1a024a.html (https://www.annistonstar.com/free/star-s-chairman-former-publisher-resigns/article_aba7e7f4-f1a4-11e7-99f6-fb901d1a024a.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on January 05, 2018, 04:43:06 PM
Obviously this prescient tweet has made the rounds. Say what you will about Patton Oswalt, not that he was the only one, but he saw this coming back in 2016.

https://twitter.com/pattonoswalt/status/762356645036953600
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMtjykTV4AEhY0M.jpg) (https://twitter.com/pattonoswalt/status/762356645036953600)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 14, 2018, 09:47:33 PM
Aziz.... for you know what:
https://pagesix.com/2018/01/14/aziz-ansari-accused-of-sexual-assault/?_ga=2.202721297.1046547902.1515984294-1445708655.1512738143


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 15, 2018, 01:07:55 PM
#metoo already dying because too many of their heroes - like Aziz - falling by the wayside?
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/15/does-the-backlash-against-aziz-ansaris-sexual-assault-allegation-mean-a-turning-point-for-the-metoo-movement/ (http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/15/does-the-backlash-against-aziz-ansaris-sexual-assault-allegation-mean-a-turning-point-for-the-metoo-movement/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 08, 2018, 08:30:10 AM
Ruh roh:

"It's been one hellacious week for Hollywood's formerly favorite director Quentin Tarantino, who finds himself increasingly the target of his peers' #MeToo-inspired antipathy, including fellow director/producer Judd Apatow and A-list actress Jessica Chastain.

Though Tarantino's problems began months ago with the flood of allegations against his long-time business partner Harvey Weinstein, the floodgates really opened this Saturday with the publication of a New York Times article by Maureen Dowd detailing Uma Thurman's account of her alleged assault at the hands of Weinstein, about which she informed Tarantino, and the alleged cover-up of a serious accident Thurman suffered on the set of "Kill Bill" after the director convinced her to do her own stunt driving. Dowd also mentioned that Tarantino insisted on performing some of the more sadistic shots himself, including choking Thurman with a chain and spitting in her face. Pressure on the director ratcheted up even more with the re-emergence of audio of his 2003 interview with Howard Stern in which Tarantino downplayed Roman Polanski's rape of a 13-year-old.

Among the big names that have blasted Tarantino is Apatow, who took to Twitter to level another #MeToo-related accusation against his fellow director and noted that Tarantino is slated to direct a film that features Roman Polanski as a character.

"Tarantino also ignored Daryl Hannah’s complaints when she was harassed by Harvey Weinstein. They kicked her off the press tour. Nobody helped her," wrote Apatow. "And now Tarantino is going to make a movie about Polanski. Why is someone financing this? This is why Weinstein wasn’t stopped."
-----------------------------------------------------

Judd's doing a whole lot of finger pointing, ain't he?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/26880/big-names-hollywood-turn-quentin-tarantino-james-barrett (https://www.dailywire.com/news/26880/big-names-hollywood-turn-quentin-tarantino-james-barrett)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 08, 2018, 11:50:41 AM
Probably cause he's a filthy cucked feminist ally.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 08, 2018, 05:27:14 PM
LAPD forwards 3 sex cases to DA:

http://variety.com/2018/biz/news/lapd-sex-cases-harvey-weinstein-district-attorney-1202692321/ (http://variety.com/2018/biz/news/lapd-sex-cases-harvey-weinstein-district-attorney-1202692321/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 10, 2018, 05:04:04 PM
Oh. The irony.

California Assemblywoman and #MeToo advocate Cristina Garcia is accused of groping a male staffer from another lawmaker's office.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/322888002

So she should immediately resign upon any such accusation. Right?

Listen and believe. Right? 😂



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 21, 2018, 01:27:25 PM
Et tu Mork?

"Robin Williams’ “Mork & Mindy” co-star, Pam Dawber, claims she was repeatedly sexually harassed by the late comedian, but she didn’t mind.

“I had the grossest things done to me by him,” Pam Dawber told New York Times writer David Itzkoff (via the Guardian). “And I never took offense. I mean I was flashed, humped, bumped, grabbed. I think he probably did it to a lot of people … but it was so much fun.”

The actress reportedly spoke to Itzkoff for his upcoming biography of the comedian, “Robin,” which is due out in May.

Dawber, 66, said Williams was able to get away with behavior — which also included walking on set naked and breaking wind on her — that some might consider reprehensible because he was being playful.

“If you put it on paper, you would be appalled,” the actress said. “But somehow he had this guileless little thing that he would do — those sparkly eyes. He’d look at you, really playful, like a puppy, all of a sudden. And then he’d grab your tits and then run away. And somehow he could get away with it.

It was the ’70s, after all.”
------------------------------------

Which is why everyone - and I do mean everyone - should miss the '70s.

https://pagesix.com/2018/03/21/robin-williams-co-star-never-took-offense-to-his-groping/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on April 26, 2018, 10:50:18 PM
And another liberal mouth breather who has often told Americans how to vote looks ready to take the fall for you know what...

"Tom Brokaw Accused of Sexual Harassment By Former NBC Anchor"

The anchor in question is Linda Vester, a long time name in the biz.  At least one other former NBC employee has also come forward.  It's yet another big name from NBC accused of preaching one thing and doing another.  It comes on the same day as perhaps the biggest name in NBC history - Bill Cosby - was convicted of multiple count of sexual misconduct.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/tom-brokaw-sexual-harassment-nbc-news-correspondent-1202789627/ (http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/tom-brokaw-sexual-harassment-nbc-news-correspondent-1202789627/)

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/04/26/skepticism-greets-nbcs-plans-to-address-in-house-sexual-harassment/ (https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/04/26/skepticism-greets-nbcs-plans-to-address-in-house-sexual-harassment/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on April 27, 2018, 06:59:32 AM
Anything to distract from the monumental achievement of the first visit ever of the N. Korean leader to the south.

Nobel is calling.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on April 27, 2018, 07:47:39 AM
Nobel is calling.

It's for Barry. 


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on April 27, 2018, 02:22:29 PM
If denuclearization or unification actually happens then the prize will probably be shared between Moon, Un, and Trump. But Pig is right, it would be a monumental achievement.

History in the making today...

(http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/shared/npr/styles/placed_wide/nprshared/201804/606270986.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on April 27, 2018, 03:12:57 PM
Perhaps its nothing, but it was Whoa Fat that crossed over into the South, not vice versa.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on April 27, 2018, 03:41:26 PM
Hollywood, pedophilia, and you!

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/media-silent-as-allison-macks-arrest-exposes-child-trafficking-for-billionaire-backed-sex-slave-ring_042018 (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/media-silent-as-allison-macks-arrest-exposes-child-trafficking-for-billionaire-backed-sex-slave-ring_042018)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 01, 2018, 01:42:18 PM
And another liberal mouth breather who has often told Americans how to vote looks ready to take the fall for you know what...

Speaking of NBC, they're now being accused of trying to cover for Brokaw.  Shocked am I, simply shocked:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/05/01/backfire-nbc-news-pressured-women-sign-tom-brokaw-support-letter/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/05/01/backfire-nbc-news-pressured-women-sign-tom-brokaw-support-letter/)


Tommy B - imagining his dick size, or grabbing imaginary boobs - who can say?
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/06/Tom-Brokaw-AP-640x480.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 01, 2018, 02:25:10 PM
And #3 coming out against Tommy B:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5679117/Tom-Brokaw-seen-NBC-woman-says-news-anchor-unwanted-sexual-advance-her.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5679117/Tom-Brokaw-seen-NBC-woman-says-news-anchor-unwanted-sexual-advance-her.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 04, 2018, 03:26:15 PM
Charlie "I digs the pussy" Rose sued by 3 CBS staffers:
http://www.tmz.com/2018/05/04/charlie-rose-lawsuit-sexual-harassment-women-cbs-this-morning/ (http://www.tmz.com/2018/05/04/charlie-rose-lawsuit-sexual-harassment-women-cbs-this-morning/)

Grand Jury subpoenas issued for Harvey "No fat chicks, just Oscar winners" Weinstein:
https://theblast.com/harvey-weinstein-grand-jury-subpoenas-issued/ (https://theblast.com/harvey-weinstein-grand-jury-subpoenas-issued/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 07, 2018, 03:26:26 PM
Details on "I digs the pussy" Rose coming out....

"He also touched all three women's arms, shoulders, waists and backs and even demanded they give him a kiss before leaving for summer vacation, according to court papers.

When Harris wore a floral-patterned miniskirt to work, the TV host allegedly told her that "the roses on her skirt were his roses."

"Mr. Rose repeatedly boasted of his sexual conquests, telling [his employees], 'You should have seen the women that I was with when I was younger,' " the suit says.

He also "suggested to Ms. Harris and Ms. McNeal that they have sex with each other and told them words to the effect of, 'You just need to become lovers already,' indicating that he was having sexual fantasies about them," the suit says."
----------------------------------------------------------

I need more TV clowns and degenerates lecturing me about morals and politics.   Don't you?

https://pagesix.com/2018/05/04/charlie-rose-suggested-female-underlings-have-sex-with-each-other-lawsuit-claims/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 24, 2018, 01:52:37 PM
ruh roh:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/05/24/eight-women-accuse-morgan-freeman-of-inappropriate-behavior/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/05/24/eight-women-accuse-morgan-freeman-of-inappropriate-behavior/)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 24, 2018, 02:39:20 PM
Not Morgan Freeman!!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 24, 2018, 02:43:59 PM
I'm gonna "I'm Morgan Freeman" dat ass.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 24, 2018, 02:55:51 PM
(http://cdn1.alloy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Morgan-Freeman-Bruce-Almighty-I-am-God.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 24, 2018, 03:05:01 PM
While we're at it:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/harvey-weinstein-set-turn-sex-crime-charges-article-1.4007960 (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/harvey-weinstein-set-turn-sex-crime-charges-article-1.4007960)

Harvey Weinstein set to turn himself in on sex crime charges in New York


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on May 24, 2018, 03:38:52 PM
Not Morgan Freeman!!

Bitches be like, "Know you're place, nigger."

Bitches gonna bitch no matter what. Notice their looks, they bitch. Stop noticing their looks, they bitch.

Never apologize to these cunts or their cuck lackeys. It was just a shit test to see if Morgan still had his balls. He just failed by apologizing.

We don't get our balls back and we'll surely be conquered by a civilization that still has them, and deservedly so.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 24, 2018, 04:25:35 PM
The poor left - the "me too" movement have netted exactly one conservative victim.... a man 99.99 % of Americans could no longer name.

Meanwhile, there are now over major 100 liberal show biz names who've been ensnared - including some of the biggest names in Hollywood.

Strong work.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 24, 2018, 05:42:20 PM
(https://media.tenor.com/images/b88aaec19e0ceb4ca47c859f410f6908/tenor.png)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 24, 2018, 05:43:07 PM
Not Morgan Freeman!!

Bitches be like, "Know you're place, nigger."

Bitches gonna bitch no matter what. Notice their looks, they bitch. Stop noticing their looks, they bitch.

Never apologize to these cunts or their cuck lackeys. It was just a shit test to see if Morgan still had his balls. He just failed by apologizing.

We don't get our balls back and we'll surely be conquered by a civilization that still has them, and deservedly so.

(https://media.tenor.com/images/b88aaec19e0ceb4ca47c859f410f6908/tenor.png)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on May 24, 2018, 08:02:24 PM
The poor left - the "me too" movement have netted exactly one conservative victim.... a man 99.99 % of Americans could no longer name.

Meanwhile, there are now over major 100 liberal show biz names who've been ensnared - including some of the biggest names in Hollywood.

Strong work.

I get you're point, but in the big picture, it's a little beyond "conservatism" and "liberalism," whatever that means to most people... if anything.

I could go on, but...


Fuck it.

What did Morgan do? Comment on a woman's looks? Put his hand on a waist or a shoulder or a knee? Any approach a man makes to a woman is now "harassment"  or "assault" if it's not an approach a woman wants at that moment or regrets at any point in the future or just wants to use as ammo against him for whatever reason: personal, monetary, political, whatever. A man needs to be able to read that woman's mind, not just at that moment, but at every point in the future.

Are you liberal or conservative to be filled with ire against the temerity of such a man to think he could get away with such things without public shame and scorn or maybe even strung up from the nearest tree?

I seriously doubt he shoved unexpected digits up a twat or was giving free titty twisters to actresses, at least not within seconds of being introduced.


Also, far too many so-called "traditional conservatives" placate women to excess and throw men under the bus, at least any who dare to criticize or avoid the plantation that post-modern "marriage" has become. I'm looking at you, PragerU (https://youtu.be/EtvfHnZMcOY). In the effeminate culture of the current year with the fucked up nightmare of its Kafekaesque legal system that allows men little to no authority in marriage while continuing to hold them responsible for nearly everything, I see plenty of tradcons advising that young men just go ahead and marry "Veruca Salt" anyway, as if that's the most likely path to success and key to curing the ills of society. I don't think so.

(https://bouncingoffcloudsdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/tumblr_m7g8sje91g1rxv5j8o1_500.gif)

Okay, they don't advise that you marry "Veruca Salt," but where are the unicorns who don't fit that characterization? The current generation of young women are the most spoiled in all of history. Enabling them with the power to tyrannically grab whatever they want might be a bad idea. Maybe tradcons should go back and read Proverbs: "It is better to dwell in the corner of the roof, than with a quarrelsome woman and in a large house."

The #metoo movement wants an oompaloompa and they want it now. They don't give a fuck about due process or making sense or anything else that they perceive as limiting their "choices" no matter how much men have to be enslaved to satisfy those "choices" privileges and entitlements they expect men to pay for. You obviously need to hold anybody who commits an actual crime against someone else accountable, but it's preferable that this be based on actual evidence than on a public shaming campaign by a bunch of feminist harpies on a playing field that's as level as the side of a pyramid.

Now, should women with the talent and industrious tenacity to compete be allowed to sell those talents in areas of competence dominated by men? Okay, sure. Why waste that resource? But is it possible to pay for that without bankrupting the whole system and sending us into another dark age? Not so sure. Everything is a trade off. The opportunity cost may ultimately be far too high.




Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 24, 2018, 08:06:15 PM
Quote
What did Morgan do?

He dared look at a woman with his man eyes.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: crow on May 25, 2018, 11:47:39 AM
So no sympathy for women at all then? Just imagine being propositioned by a homosexual stranger who made it clear that he wanted to vigorously thrust his dick in your butt. Would you find this experience to be nice or rude? There is video of Freeman being a dirty old man multiple times even when he knew cameras were rolling. He all but said "Hey you're 60 years younger than me but I really wanna fuck you." This is to someone just trying to do her job. I know some people have a problem with change, but that behavior shouldn't be accepted anymore. He was abusing the fact that he's a rich celebrity and he thinks he can just get what he wants. The days of the grabby Warren Beattys are over as they should be.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 11:55:02 AM
https://apnews.com/ebaf3f3100fd4fb9bdf8382f66f4ce0c/Harvey-Weinstein-arraigned-on-rape,-criminal-sex-act-charges

Harvey Weinstein Arraigned On Felony Sex Crime Charges, Pleads Not Guilty

(https://mechanteanemone.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/heavy-metal-captain-sternn1-e1305045716915.png)

Not Guilty!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 11:56:09 AM
....and as far as sympathy for women....

Remember:

(https://www.advocate.com/sites/advocate.com/files/2017/12/21/01-she_knew.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 25, 2018, 12:06:09 PM
They all knew.  That includes every big name in Hollywood - yup, Speilbergo too.

Well, Harvey's lawyer is right about one thing - Harvey did not invent the casting couch...

...but if that's the best defense he has, Harvey better get used to butt sex.  The hard way.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 12:34:25 PM
Relax Charlie....he's got an angle....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 25, 2018, 12:42:48 PM
WHAT ANGLE!?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 12:48:42 PM
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/33/79/57/33795751cbc1946a03ece1ff08578514.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 12:50:46 PM
Look, I might be a bit ignorant (yeah, no shit! whoo hoo!), but are 'casting couch' type arrangements actually illegal?

I mean, at what point is it 'rape'?

If you got 'couched', but benefited, do you have to return the benefit if you later charge to 'coucher'?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 01:01:47 PM
http://www.tmz.com/2018/05/25/james-caan-morgan-freeman-sexual-misconduct-men-women/ (http://www.tmz.com/2018/05/25/james-caan-morgan-freeman-sexual-misconduct-men-women/)

Jimmy Caan has something to say here!

(http://i1.wp.com/www.wearemoviegeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/James-Caan-Headshot.jpg?resize=501%2C640)


We're in a Strange Place
MEN CAN'T HIT ON WOMEN ANYMORE


Brother, you aint half kiddin.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 25, 2018, 01:09:30 PM
Well, it's certainly rape if any of the girls were under the age of consent....

...And I'm guessing NYPD has got some women willing to say they never said yes.

Far as the casting couch goes, yeah when you show up to a 2am "reading" it's a bit hard to be too sympathetic.  Indeed, I believe SAG is trying to outlaw such.... business arrangements.

Here's the reality - Harvey was so in your face about his misdeeds, that even a few - OK, one, Ronan Farrow - liberals were getting uncomfortable with his antics.  But of course he had long ago bribed & cajoled & "hey, I donated to Hillary so it's cool!"ed just about every dem on the east coast, including all the news organizions - which meant they weren't going to say a word.  

Can't divorce politics from this case.  As the dozens and dozens of pics prove, Harvey's best pals were the liberal elite.... the very ones now leading the cause, so to speak.

The shock waves will die down after a few big names - and their heads - roll.  Hollywood will declare everything's okey-dokey and go back to business as a usual - bizarre sexual crimes, and telling the rest of America how to live.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 25, 2018, 01:14:12 PM
(https://i.gifer.com/CSZy.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 27, 2018, 11:27:51 AM
Poor "I'm" Morgan Freeman, apparently the tagline "It's everywhere you want to be" was too ironic for Visa to handle....

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/05/26/visa-morgan-freeman-endorsements-sexual-harassment/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/05/26/visa-morgan-freeman-endorsements-sexual-harassment/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 30, 2018, 08:30:32 PM
Interesting...


HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND THE CLINTON PROTECTION RACKET
May 30, 2018

Harvey Weinstein's recent perp walk reminds me of another great thing about Trump winning the election: Hillary Clinton isn't president.

A New York Times article on Weinstein's court appearance noted how the "ground shifted" last year, finally ending the "code of silence" surrounding powerful men. Why "last year," if this has been going on for decades?

The article explained that Weinstein's power was enormous, his connections extensive and his willingness to play dirty without bounds. Did Harvey lose his money and connections "last year"?

Nope. But "last year" was the first year of Trump's presidency, or as I like to think of it, the first year of Hillary not being president. Ever.

The liberal protection racket for sexual predators was always intimately intertwined with the Clintons. The template used to defend Bill Clinton became a model for all left-wing sexual predators. They all hired the same lawyers and detectives and counted on the same cultural elites to mete out punishment to anyone who stood in the way of their Caligula lifestyles. It was Total War against the original #MeToo movement.

Even Teddy Kennedy never plotted revenge on reporters or smeared his sexual conquests as bimbos, trailer park trash and stalkers. That was the Clinton model.

Showing how incestuous it was, in 2000 -- two years after Clinton's impeachment -- Weinstein used his publishing company, Talk/Miramax, overseen by Tina Brown, to take revenge on anyone involved in Clinton's impeachment.

The publishing house commissioned a book by John Connolly to dig into the private sex lives of the people who had helped expose Bill Clinton, e.g., the lawyers behind Paula Jones' lawsuit, Ken Starr's staff, Linda Tripp lawyer Jim Moody, Matt Drudge, reporter Michael Isikoff and so on.

Concise summary of the book: All of us were gay, except me, because I was having an affair with Geraldo Rivera.

We know this because drafts of the book, "The Insane Clown Posse," soon began to leak. Talk/Miramax's editor-in-chief Jonathan Burnham denied that any private eyes had been prying into our private lives and said he'd kill the book if it were true.

I went on "Rivera Live" and produced a letter given to me by an ex-boyfriend from a private eye looking for dirt on me:

"My office has been engaged by John C. Connolly, a writer who has performed work for Spy, New York, Premiere, Vanity Fair and a few other magazines. The project for which my services were engaged deals with January 16th, 1998, the day Monica Lewinsky was corralled by the office of the independent counsel. Mr. Connolly has described the goal as 'a day in the life of'-type book, and to that he has directed me to conduct interviews and look into the background and activities of a few peripheral characters, including the author of 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors,' one Ann Coulter.

"Nils B. Grevillius, private investigator"

As a result, the book was killed. But what if my ex hadn't given me that letter?

No one cared about any of our private lives. The only point was to humiliate anyone who hadn't endorsed Clinton's treatment of women as his sexual playthings.

There were plenty who did.

Well into the Monica Lewinsky scandal -- which followed the Gennifer Flowers scandal, the Paula Jones scandal, the Dolly Kyle Browning scandal, the Elizabeth Ward Gracen scandal, the Sally Perdue scandal and the Kathleen Willey scandal -- feminist icon Gloria Steinem wrote her infamous New York Times op-ed, announcing the "One Free Grope" rule for progressive men.

"He takes no for an answer," Steinem explained. Whether he was groping Kathleen Willey in the Oval Office or dropping his pants for Paula Jones in the Excelsior Hotel, she said, Clinton "accepted rejection."

Soon thereafter, we found out about Juanita Broaddrick.

As Bob Herbert wrote in The New York Times, the reaction of the feminists to Clinton's predatory behavior "can most charitably be described as restrained." (This was when the Times was still an occasionally serious newspaper.)

Not one Senate Democrat voted to remove Clinton from office for various felonies related to his sexual assaults.

The message was clear. Liberal men got a pass for any sexual misconduct, even rape. But woe be to those who accused them. (Even last year, NBC News was still following the old rule: It fired Ronan Farrow rather than publish his Weinstein expose.)

Liberal males treated progressive politics like carbon credits for rape. Last year, MSNBC's Kasie Hunt reported that Democratic sexual predators on Capitol Hill say, "I can't be sexist; I'm a progressive."

Recall that Weinstein's reaction to the accusations against him was to say: "I've decided that I'm going to give the NRA my full attention. I hope Wayne LaPierre will enjoy his retirement party. I'm going to do it at the same place I had my Bar Mitzvah."

It's hard to avoid the impression that a big part of the reason Weinstein was finally exposed is that the Clinton machine is dead. Trump killed it. Would anyone have called out Weinstein if his good friend Hillary Clinton were "Madame President"? I doubt it. The Clinton protection racket would have gone on and on and on.

After years of feminists excusing sexual predators, once the Clintons were out of the way, the dam broke. There was no reason to keep humiliating themselves by defending the indefensible.

The Worst Generation has flatlined. There are no more Clintons to save. But as absolutely intellectually convinced as I am of the Clintons' demise, I'd feel a lot better if someone would keep a wooden stake handy


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on May 30, 2018, 08:51:38 PM
All part of why it's impossible to divorce politics from this particular issue - virtually all the evil doers are liberals, all of them knew each other, and all of them were very vocal about why conservatives are immoral and/or why voting for liberals was a positive good.

Pro tip - if you're going to take tens of thousands - perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars - from people who rape kids, maybe just maybe don't call half the country "deplorably irredeemable".  Turns out, it's a bad look.

From newspapers like the New York Times to TV networks like MSNBC to politicians like Hillary, the whole stinking lot is either straight up guilty, or guilty by omission of action.  That Oscar show was a giant shit-fest in no small part because they all sat there doing their best Sgt Shultz, "Who, me?  I knew nothing!"



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on May 31, 2018, 06:46:19 AM
But it looks like Germaine Greer has a dissenting opinion about rape....

https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/31/germaine-greer-tells-hay-literary-festival-rape-just-bad-sex-7592531/

Germaine Greer tells Hay Literary Festival ‘Most rape is just bad sex’

Allegations ‘wreck lives’: ‘The amount of legal muscle that will be used to defend these people is massive and I’m concerned for damage limitation rather than maximasation. ‘Rather than wrecking people’s lives, so they become career rapees.’

Non-disclosure agreements: ‘Some [alleged victims] have been paid six figure sums in the form of non-disclosure agreements. ‘That’s a dishonorable thing to accept and it’s not something you should boast about.’

#MeToo doesn’t work: ‘I don’t actually think it’s gone too far, I don’t think its got anywhere at all. ‘What we need is to sort out the law regarding rape and to sort out our concept of what it is.’

Historic allegations ‘pointless’: ‘It’s pointless now bringing up this stuff when most of it no action can be taken. ‘Why wait 20 years?’

What she would have done: ‘I wouldn’t have been sitting around being quiet and keeping a secret.’

For those who don't know, this woman is the Australian equivalent to Betty Friedan; basically a feminist cunt.  But, it's interesting to hear this perspective, especially in light of the fact that so many 'progressives' are getting snared in this net.  As a progressive, Mrs Greer would have an obligation to water down the definition of and emotional reactions to rape.

Or so it seems to me?  I dunno, but it is curious to note this in context with all of these allegations springing up, mostly in the entertainment industry.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on June 06, 2018, 05:56:50 PM
Germaine Greer also had the audacity to acknowledge that "trans women" aren't women and shouldn't get to wield what comes with that status in society, like occupying female-only spaces. Of course, she probably would be against there being any male-only spaces, but there you go.

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-34625512/germaine-greer-transgender-women-are-not-women (https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-34625512/germaine-greer-transgender-women-are-not-women)

I guess it's difficult to keep two contradictory views in your head when your estrogen wanes in old age. Maybe she now has an annoyingly pressing need to make sense on occasion.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/12/germaine-greer-tells-qa-her-trans-views-were-wrong-but-then-restates-them (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/12/germaine-greer-tells-qa-her-trans-views-were-wrong-but-then-restates-them)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on June 06, 2018, 06:24:43 PM
"Germaine Greer also had the audacity to acknowledge that "trans women" aren't women and shouldn't get to wield what comes with that status in society, like occupying female-only spaces."

Nice.  Big.  Cock.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on June 06, 2018, 08:17:40 PM
(http://media.giphy.com/media/GD0bAgHAIc31m/giphy.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on July 02, 2018, 07:26:24 PM
With the three new charges today, Harvey's looking at life in Sing Sing:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5909941/Harvey-Weinstein-charged-raping-woman-2006-two-counts-predatory-sexual-assault.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5909941/Harvey-Weinstein-charged-raping-woman-2006-two-counts-predatory-sexual-assault.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on July 02, 2018, 07:30:00 PM
I wonder if he'll kick the dirt machine into overdrive then and dump everything that he knows and everybody at the same time? If I go, you go.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on July 02, 2018, 07:36:21 PM
Harvey's crucifixion will give us absolution for our sins. Hallelujah!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on July 02, 2018, 07:41:55 PM
I wonder if he'll kick the dirt machine into overdrive then and dump everything that he knows and everybody at the same time? If I go, you go.

Well, that's sounds right, but then again we know for a fact that there was an attempted coup by the former President, the FBI, and DoJ and not a single person's been charged much less hung.

What is he gonna do, tell us that Hillary is a particularly loathsome who would do virtually anything to gain power?  Pretty sure we know that.  Just look at this thread man - there's been literally hundreds of people, all liberal and many of them super famous, who have fallen.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on July 27, 2018, 12:28:52 PM
Add yet another powerful liberal in show looks to be in deep do-do, as CBS President Les Moonves has been accused of sexual misconduct:

"The allegations are said in part to involve instances of unwanted kissing and touching that occurred more than 20 years ago, as well as numerous claims that occurred more recently.

Moonves, 68, has been married to CBS personality Julie Chen since 2004. (The two wed less than two weeks after Moonves finalized his divorce from Nancy Wiesenfeld, whom he had married in 1978.)"
----------------------------------

Now that's classy!  The person breaking the story is the same one who first ried breaking the Harvey story - Ronan Farrow - but was shut down by NBC News.  It should be noted that CBS is one of the worst networks for Trump Derangement Syndrome.... which is saying something.  CBS has already had to shit can Charlie Rose for his alleged misconduct.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cbs-stock-dives-leslie-moonves-expose-by-ronan-farrow-1130322 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cbs-stock-dives-leslie-moonves-expose-by-ronan-farrow-1130322)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on July 27, 2018, 02:39:20 PM
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/exclusive-kimberly-guilfoyle-left-fox-news-after-investigation-into-misconduct-allegations-sources-say/ar-BBL8scr (https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/exclusive-kimberly-guilfoyle-left-fox-news-after-investigation-into-misconduct-allegations-sources-say/ar-BBL8scr)

"Six sources said Guilfoyle’s behavior included showing personal photographs of male genitalia to colleagues (and identifying whose genitals they were), regularly discussing sexual matters at work and engaging in emotionally abusive behavior toward hair and makeup artists and support staff."

(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TEO62ab6GnI/VGazxWxg7tI/AAAAAAABZ80/E4u0hww3WkA/s1600/Kimberly_Guilfoyle_victoriassecret.filminspector.com_7.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on July 27, 2018, 04:24:58 PM
Look at those juggs.

(https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.6tHnnhWmrh6J6hQaXvotcAHaD5&pid=Api)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on July 27, 2018, 07:06:29 PM
End sexual harassment laws.

Just strike them off the books.

Bring back Caligula.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on July 28, 2018, 07:56:16 AM
Harvey did nothing wrong.

Whores are gonna whore... and they're all whores.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on July 28, 2018, 02:34:13 PM
Harvey & Hillary - the dream ticket for rapists everywhere!

Meanwhile, Farrow's article dropped and yeah, and smart money says it's gonna be yet another huge name at CBS given the boot:

"Les Moonves and CBS Face Allegations of Sexual Misconduct
Six women accuse the C.E.O. of harassment and intimidation, and dozens more describe abuse at his company."
------------------------

Perhaps I'd be less offended by these morons if they had simply kept their mouths shut.  If they didn't constantly preach one thing yet do another.  If they weren't always so utterly wrong in their politics. To wit:

"In recent months, Moonves has become a prominent voice in Hollywood’s #MeToo movement. In December, he helped found the Commission on Eliminating Sexual Harassment and Advancing Equality in the Workplace, which is chaired by Anita Hill. “It’s a watershed moment,” Moonves said at a conference in November. “I think it’s important that a company’s culture will not allow for this. And that’s the thing that’s far-reaching. There’s a lot we’re learning. There’s a lot we didn’t know.”

But Moonves’s private actions belie his public statements. "
---------------------------------------

As does nearly every Hollywood type who sits there with a straight face and pretends that they've hear whispers, but not actually seen anything happen..... you know, otherwise they'd name names.

Les Moonves - they guy who allows Colbert to give a Heil Hitler salute, gave a job to Charlie "look at my dick" Rose, and the guy who says molesting chicks even as he chases 'em around the office.  He's officially...

A BAG OF SHIT.

(https://alltagsobjektplastiktuete.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/imag1069.jpg)

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/les-moonves-and-cbs-face-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/les-moonves-and-cbs-face-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on July 28, 2018, 03:23:44 PM
(http://pics.me.me/lwas-petrified-gwyneth-paltrow-his-behavior-was-outrageous-kate-beckinsaleno-28420457.png)

I can see how Harvey is unlikeable. Don't get me wrong. But I honestly don't think he actually raped anyone. Why would he need to? Women would fuck that troll because of who he was and what he could do for them. Women tend to go for that sort of thing. People need to grow up.

Don't know if you ever read this bit from this open letter from Vincent Gallo. No matter what you may think of him or his art, his words ring true here. It illustrates something about the efficacy of believing what a woman, particularly an actress, is willing to tell an influential man who's, in turn, under her influence. Going off half-cocked can really backfire, and in the end you may have destoyed yourself for some phony cause based on a lie some bitch manipulated you into believing. In other words, don't be "only pawn in game of life."


"I was close to Asia Argento, but we were never engaged. I do remember though threatening Harvey Weinstein for what Asia claimed he did to her. That created a real enemy in Harvey who certainly went out of his way to marginalize my work and my opportunities as much as he could. By calling him out then I was his enemy and no one from the press would repeat any of my claims against him. My clash with him was costly to me in a real way.  Naturally, it felt bad when, instead of speaking out along with me, Asia then denied and changed her story and went on to work with him, carry on a personal relationship with him, and repeat additional things I said about him to further enrage him against me. Her appearance in recent press regarding Harvey is very uncomfortable for me.

What if, instead of taking a $100,000 payoff to remain silent, Rose McGowan filed charges against Harvey Weinstein at the time of her incident? How many future incidents would she have prevented?

Harvey Weinstein is a brutal pig, yes, but I really wish it wasn’t those two particular girls getting glorified for now saying so.

The feminist tribe chooses odd heroes. Hillary Clinton. Feminism should be a fight for fairness. Instead the fight is only to control outcome. And when feminists don’t like outcome, they assume something’s unfair. Like fools. Most of the left is the same way."

http://www.anothermanmag.com/life-culture/10236/an-open-letter-from-vincent-gallo-unfiltered-and-unedited (http://www.anothermanmag.com/life-culture/10236/an-open-letter-from-vincent-gallo-unfiltered-and-unedited)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on July 28, 2018, 06:41:52 PM
Oh, I never said Harvey's a rapist  - although that may well be the ultimate legal judgment of him - but he's certainly a nasty piece of work.

And yeah, those women didn't exactly say no when they were unknowns.  But of course that's the whole point - you shouldn't have to fuck a nasty-troll man to get a job, even if it is a very nice job. 

At the same time, don't pretend you don't know who's who in the zoo.

None of them are particularly appealing, are they?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 09, 2018, 05:26:56 PM
Why did it have to be the talented Affleck?

"Casey Affleck addresses sexual misconduct claims: I was 'really unprofessional' and 'I'm sorry'

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/09/casey-affleck-addresses-sexual-misconduct-claims-was-really-unprofessional-and-im-sorry.html (http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/09/casey-affleck-addresses-sexual-misconduct-claims-was-really-unprofessional-and-im-sorry.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 09, 2018, 06:02:38 PM
#IDGAF


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 20, 2018, 05:46:54 PM
AND apparently having a star of your film be accused of multiple child rapes ain't so good for the bottom kine as Kevin Spacey's newest flick earning all of $618.  Total.  Over the weekend.

Which ought to be the final nail in his coffin - Hollywood might allow pederasts, but they won't allow box office failure.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kevin-spacey-movie-takes-dismal-618-173719286.html (https://www.yahoo.com/news/kevin-spacey-movie-takes-dismal-618-173719286.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 22, 2018, 12:39:03 PM
Here's Kevin Spacey, preparing for his next role.

(https://fourfivetwodotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/52011.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 22, 2018, 01:00:17 PM
I think you have that backwards...

(http://www.esarcasm.com/wp-content/man-in-diapers-bending-over-225x300.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 22, 2018, 01:37:43 PM
My Mistake!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 22, 2018, 01:58:31 PM
Who knows - he might like it.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 22, 2018, 02:34:05 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/l-prosecutors-reviewing-sex-assault-case-involving-kevin-192000068.html (https://www.yahoo.com/news/l-prosecutors-reviewing-sex-assault-case-involving-kevin-192000068.html)

MORE??!?!!?

L.A. prosecutors reviewing new sex assault case involving Kevin Spacey

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Los Angeles prosecutors said on Wednesday they were reviewing a sexual assault case involving actor Kevin Spacey.

"A sex assault case was presented yesterday to our office by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department involving Kevin Spacey. It remains under review," Los Angeles District Attorney spokesman Greg Risling said in an emailed statement, without providing details.

Representatives for the actor did not immediately return requests for comment on Wednesday.

The District Attorney's office said in April that it was reviewing a case involving Spacey dating from 1992, involving an adult male.

More than 30 men have said they were victims of unwanted sexual advances by Spacey, who became embroiled in controversy last year when actor Anthony Rapp accused him of trying to seduce him in 1986 when Rapp was 14. In October, Spacey apologized for any inappropriate conduct with Rapp but has not commented since.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 22, 2018, 02:41:05 PM
It becomes ever more unlikely that it is possible for his fellow co-workers not to know of his proclivities.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 22, 2018, 02:46:14 PM
It becomes ever more unlikely that it is possible for his fellow co-workers not to know of his proclivities.

Well, come in, SOMEBODY had to know!  Sheesh!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 30, 2018, 02:07:26 PM
"I'll take the rapist," says Gerard Depardieu (in French):

"Gerard Depardieu Accused of Sexual Assault

A French woman, believed to be an actress in her 20s, has reportedly filed a criminal complaint with French police against the 69-year-old.

French actor Gerard Depardieu has been accused of rape and sexual assault, according to a report from the BBC Thursday. He denies the claims.

According to Holland-based news agency BNO News, citing French officials, an investigation was launched after a woman told police that she was raped by Depardieu on two separate occasions."
------------------------------------------------

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/gerard-depardieu-accused-sexual-assault-1138559 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/gerard-depardieu-accused-sexual-assault-1138559)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 30, 2018, 02:43:34 PM
"Je vais prendre le violeur"

He banged me twice and I'm broke, so you know, how about money and stuff?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 30, 2018, 03:27:50 PM
Yeah, it's the 2nd claim that throws a whole lot of water on the first claim.  It's mighty hard to believe to that someone who was raped voluntarily goes back to hang out, ain't it?

False claims of rape do more damage to actual victims then anything else other than their actual rapists.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on August 31, 2018, 11:25:33 AM
Looks like NBC News covered up yet another Harvey rape story:

"NBC News Covered Up ‘Credible’ Rape Allegation Against Harvey Weinstein

NBC News covered up a credible rape allegation against Harvey Weinstein, according to sources who spoke to the New York Times and Daily Beast.

“Three days before Ronan [Farrow] and I were going to head to L.A. to interview a woman with a credible rape allegation against Harvey Weinstein, I was ordered to stop, not to interview this woman,” an NBC News whistleblower told the far-left New York Times. “And to stand down on the story altogether.”
---------------------------

Covering up for sex crazed democrats has got to be a full time job...

https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/08/31/reports-nbc-news-covered-up-credible-rape-allegation-against-harvey-weinstein/ (https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/08/31/reports-nbc-news-covered-up-credible-rape-allegation-against-harvey-weinstein/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on August 31, 2018, 12:58:32 PM
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/03/Barack-Obama-shhh-Getty-640x480.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 10, 2018, 04:06:41 PM
And NBC isn't alone as CBS just canned TV legend Les Moonves for you know what:

"The allegations, reported by Ronan Farrow, include forced kissing, forced oral sex, unwanted advances and physical abuse. Some of the women say Moonves retaliated against them and that their careers suffered after they rebuffed his advances."
----------------------

And for those keeping score, yes, Moonves is a dyed in the wool lib... who hired the now also disgraced Charlie Rose.

I'm sensing a pattern....


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leslie-moonves-departs-cbs-ceo-chairman-financial-package-withheld-pending-investigation/ (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leslie-moonves-departs-cbs-ceo-chairman-financial-package-withheld-pending-investigation/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 12, 2018, 03:55:29 PM
And another CBS big wig has been shown the door for you know what, this time 60 Minutes chief Jeff Fager:

"The exec had been at CBS News for 36 years and has been a leading figure at the news division for decades.

"Jeff Fager is leaving the company effective immediately," CBS News president David Rhodes said Wednesday in a statement.

In a July 27 New Yorker story, Fager was accused of ignoring and enabling bad behavior by two high-ranking male producers at 60 Minutes. Anonymous former employees who spoke to the writer, Farrow, also accused Fager of misconduct."
----------------------------------------

60 Minutes had become a clown show under Fager, essentially a propaganda show of the democrat party.  Their complete ignoring of the dozens of scandals under Obama - not the least of which was an attempted coup - turned a nominally respectable news show into a commercial for democrats.

That he seems to be a sex fiend as well compounds his failure.

This now marks 3 of the most powerful people at CBS fired for sexual misconduct.  Naturally, we should still rely on their opinions on politics and morality despite these tiny setbacks.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/60-minutes-chief-jeff-fager-steps-down-1132722 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/60-minutes-chief-jeff-fager-steps-down-1132722)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 13, 2018, 12:30:39 PM
That's our Harvey!
https://news.sky.com/story/world-exclusive-video-shows-harvey-weinstein-behaving-inappropriately-with-businesswoman-11496038


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 13, 2018, 12:37:42 PM
But....did he RAPE her?

Or was he just a boor?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 13, 2018, 12:42:27 PM
It indicates a pattern, a mind set.

Gotta remember, it's not our robot over-lords who determine guilt or innocence (yet), but a jury.  Given the presumed other mountains of evidence, it's yet one more piece of  "bad optics".


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 13, 2018, 12:55:19 PM
It indicates a pattern, a mind set.

Gotta remember, it's not our robot over-lords who determine guilt or innocence (yet), but a jury.  Given the presumed other mountains of evidence, it's yet one more piece of  "bad optics".

Granted, but isn't he being accused of RAPE?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 13, 2018, 01:13:46 PM
Yup - the video taken was before the alleged rape:

"From there, things only go from bad to worse as Thompson attempts to pitch her service, but Weinstein continues to make advances, touching her inappropriately and making suggestive remarks. At one point, he appears genuinely interested in using her service, instructing her to tell her boss to sign him up. He then asks to meet her for a drink later at the Tribeca Grand Hotel lobby ostensibly to close the deal, but when she arrived, he led her straight to his hotel room, where she says he raped her:

    “It wasn’t at 10pm, it wasn’t an invitation to go to his hotel room, it was an invitation to come to a hotel lobby that was within blocks of the office and so that to me felt much safer than being alone with him in his office.”

    “If I would try to fight myself away from him, he would then move around to a place where he could block me in. I constantly felt trapped, no matter where I turned. He corned me, over and over again.”

Thompson says that before she went to business school, she had worked in Wall Street which was a heavily male dominated environment, but had never met anyone she couldn’t handle until Harvey Weinstein."
------------------------------
The charges so far:

"On May 25, 2018, Weinstein was charged by New York police with "rape, criminal sex act, sex abuse and sexual misconduct for incidents involving two separate women". On that day, he was arrested after surrendering to police."

The Feds also looking at him.

So yeah, it's a bad, bad look.

https://uproxx.com/news/harvey-weinstein-accuser-footage-groping/



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 13, 2018, 01:20:59 PM
Adios, Harvey.

BTW - This really SHOULD make NBC look like shit.

It won't, but it SHOULD.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 13, 2018, 01:28:22 PM
NBC ain't alone - the New York Times had a juicy story 13+ years ago.... and sat on it.

https://www.newsweek.com/new-york-times-could-have-exposed-harvey-weinsteins-sexual-misconduct-over-680451 (https://www.newsweek.com/new-york-times-could-have-exposed-harvey-weinsteins-sexual-misconduct-over-680451)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 13, 2018, 01:53:24 PM
NBC ain't alone - the New York Times had a juicy story 13+ years ago.... and sat on it.

https://www.newsweek.com/new-york-times-could-have-exposed-harvey-weinsteins-sexual-misconduct-over-680451 (https://www.newsweek.com/new-york-times-could-have-exposed-harvey-weinsteins-sexual-misconduct-over-680451)

I wonder if there's any bias at work here?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 13, 2018, 02:09:07 PM
Nah.  Also likely not to get too much reporting today at the Times or NBC News as yet another powerful democrat in trouble for... well, you know:

"A new Ohio-based PAC is running an ad campaign targeting Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown for allegedly abusing his ex-wife.

#MeTooOhio says they are “striving to hold accountable the men who hold on to powerful positions while having a history of domestic violence of women.” On Thursday morning, the PAC launched an ad campaign calling out Sen. Brown’s alleged history of domestic abuse and demanding he resign from his U.S. Senate seat.

“Now, Senator Sherrod Brown is facing his own #MeToo moment from his past,” a video ad by Me Too Ohio states. “These court records show sworn evidence that Brown’s ex-wife accused him of abusing her. She said Brown assaulted her. A judge had to issue a restraining order.

“It’s the height of hypocrisy for him to claim to be an advocate for women with these disturbing charges in his past,” #MeToo Ohio Communications Coordinator Alice Stewart said. “It’s time to demonstrate, yet again, that women deserve to be believed.”
----------------------------

Hypocrisy is the bread and rape the butter for dems.  But hey, you really should listen to them anyways.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/13/sherrod-brown-abuse-me-too-moment/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 13, 2018, 02:37:43 PM
Laws are for thee....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 13, 2018, 03:19:49 PM
Hey, speaking of horrifically dishonest legacy media shit-heels, more details on the twin disasters at CBS right now:

"The last straw that led to the ouster of CBS Corp. Chief Executive Les Moonves was not the new claims of sexual assault and harassment in a New Yorker article Sunday, but revelations in August that he was being blackmailed by one of his alleged victims and was trying to get her a job to secure her silence, the New York Times reported late Wednesday.

"Moonves still had strong support from some CBS board members after the first allegations against him were published by the New Yorker in July, the Times said. But that support reportedly eroded after directors learned one of Moonves' accusers was threatening to go public, and that Moonves was trying to pay her off with a job at CBS. That shattered his credibility regarding his previous denials to the board that he had done anything wrong, the Times reported, and the board started to seek his ouster."
----------------------------------

CBS' board now claiming that because he was a dirty fucking liar and tried blackmail, that he's no longer owed the $120 million his contract calls for.  Oops.  But the slime at CBS does not end there:

"CBS revealed Wednesday that Fager had warned CBS reporter Jericka Duncan, who was reporting on the news division's own sexual-misconduct scandal, to "be careful," adding, "there are people who lost their jobs trying to harm me, and if you pass on these damaging claims without your own reporting to back them up, that will become a serious problem."
----------------------------

Golly gee, that could be interpreted as a physical threat, couldn't it?

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/coverup-was-last-straw-in-moonves-ouster-from-cbs-report-2018-09-12 (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/coverup-was-last-straw-in-moonves-ouster-from-cbs-report-2018-09-12)

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2018/09/12/cbs-news-fires-60-minutes-boss-jeff-fager-days-after-moonves-exit/1280981002/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2018/09/12/cbs-news-fires-60-minutes-boss-jeff-fager-days-after-moonves-exit/1280981002/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 13, 2018, 06:43:48 PM
#metoo!!

#paymetoo!!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on September 17, 2018, 03:32:46 PM
Libtard fight!!!!!


"Asia Argento is threatening legal action against Rose McGowan. On Twitter, Argento gave McGowan 24 hours to retract claims she made detailing how she discovered that Argento had reportedly paid off actor Jimmy Bennett, who alleges the actress assaulted him when he was 17 years old.

"Dear @RoseMcGowan," Argento tweeted."It is with genuine regret that I am giving you 24 hours to retract and apologise for the horrendous lies made against me in your statement of August 27th. If you fail to address this libel I will have no option other than to take immediate legal action."

After the story broke, McGowan said that her partner, Rain Dove, told her that Argento said she had slept with Bennett when he was underage and that she had been receiving unsolicited nude photos of Bennett since he was 12 years old."
-------------------------

Please sue please sue please sue....

https://variety.com/2018/film/news/asia-argento-rose-mcgowan-sexual-assault-1202943981/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on September 17, 2018, 06:27:11 PM
(https://i.imgflip.com/ss3z7.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on October 11, 2018, 11:30:28 AM
Is the case falling apart?

https://deadline.com/2018/10/harvey-weinstein-new-york-judge-dismisses-count-sexual-assault-1202480832/

Harvey Weinstein Gets A Big Win As NY Judge Dismisses One Count And Gives Defense More Time To Fight

Harvey Weinstein appeared without handcuffs in New York Supreme Court this morning and even flashed a faint smile, a big change from his previous sober and shackled appearances in his sexual assault trial.

The fallen mogul’s more upbeat demeanor suited the outcome of the day. Judge James Burke dismissed one of the six counts against him after the Manhattan D.A. agreed to drop it, and also pushed a key ruling to December, giving the defense more time to fight the charges.

The ditched sexual assault count stemmed from allegations by Lucia Evans, who told the New Yorker a year ago that Weinstein forced her to perform oral sex in his office in 2004. At the time, she was a 21-year-old student and aspiring actress.

Weinstein’s legal team will have until November 16 to file further motions attacking the remaining charges against him. The judge called a hearing for December 20, when he is expected to rule on those motions, meaning the flagship trial of the #MeToo era will not see serious courtroom action until well into 2019, if indeed it does proceed to trial.

Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, the lead prosecutor in the case, insisted that the agreement to drop the count would have no bearing on the case’s resolution. “Nothing in this disclosure impacts the strength of the remaining case and the other five counts,” she said, including the most serious count, for predatory sexual assault. “We are moving full steam ahead.”

Weinstein’s lawyer Benjamin Brafman maintained the jettisoned count is a sign that the entire case is built on a weak foundation, one he and the legal team intend to spend the next several weeks undermining. “Some of the most vocal, outspoken critics of Mr. Weinstein have put their opinions into the media” without a legitimate legal claim, he argued. Although Brafman said he has “great respect” for the D.A.’s office, “I have deep regret that the thoroughness of the investigation did not prevent them from charging Mr. Weinstein with a crime he did not commit.”

An attorney for Evans told the Associated Press the dropping of the count “says nothing about Weinstein’s guilt or innocence.” Rather, “it only speaks volumes about the Manhattan D.A.’s office and its mishandling of my client’s case.”

A letter dated September 12 that reportedly describes the Evans-Weinstein encounter as consensual will be unsealed later today by the court. Iluzzi-Orbon cited the letter as the key factor in dropping the count.

Today’s actions by Burke follows a decision in September to delay trial activity so as to minimize potential interference with the mid-term elections.

Out on $1 million bail after having entered a not-guilty plea to the first round of indictment and surrendering his passport earlier this year, Weinstein was last in court on July 9 to enter another not-guilty plea. That came after the Manhattan D.A.’s office slapped him with additional and more damning sex crime charges on July 2.

Those follow-on charges marked an additional count of criminal sexual act for a forcible sexual act that allegedly occurred in 2006. If found guilty, the much accused The Weinstein Company founder could spend the rest of his life in prison.

Brafman asserted again that Weinstein has not committed any crime and said he planned to file an application with the New York Police Department asking the detective who interviewed Evans to be banned from the case. He promised a “very complicated investigation” would be undertaken to review prosecutors’ remaining charges.

The New York Post, never known for its restraint, blasted out a headline just before the judge dismissed the sexual assault count, wondering if the D.A.’s case is “in danger of falling apart.” It hasn’t gotten to that point just yet, but for now the momentum appears to be on the Weinstein side.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2018, 01:36:04 PM
Luc Besson - he's done:

"Director Luc Besson Accused of Sexual Misconduct By Five More Women

Celebrated French director Luc Besson is being accused by five additional women of various forms of sexual misconduct. This brings his total number of accusers to nine.

The far-left Hollywood Reporter reports that “The claims are the latest following a rape complaint filed by Belgian-Dutch actress Sand Van Roy in May and accusations that he assaulted a casting director in the 2000s and sexually harassed an employee.”

Besson denied the rape charge. Paris police are still investigating the allegations."

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2018/11/29/director-luc-besson-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-by-five-more-women/ (https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2018/11/29/director-luc-besson-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-by-five-more-women/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2018, 02:37:46 PM
Meanwhile, it gets worse for Les "the mess" Moonves:

"Les Moonves Accused of Sexually Assaulting Actress Bobbie Phillips, Launching Cover-Up Scheme

Former CBS chairman and CEO Les Moonves allegedly sexually assaulted actress Bobbie Phillip and help hatched a plan to cover-up the 20-plus-year-old incident, according to a report released Wednesday.

The New York Times reports Phillip’s manager Marv Dauer set up a meeting between the actress and Moonves, who was president of Warner Bros. at the time, in March 1995. Mooves is said to have promised Philips that he would connect her with casting director John Levey to mull over potential roles for the actress.

During the meeting, Phillips alleges Moonves had unbuttoned his pants and exposed his genitals to the horrified actress. “Look how hard you make me,” the Warner Bros. executive allegedly told Philips. “Be my girlfriend and I’ll put you on any show.”
---------------------------------------

As a free bonus, he'll tell you how to vote too!

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2018/11/29/les-moonves-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-actress-bobbie-phillips-launching-cover-up-scheme/ (https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2018/11/29/les-moonves-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-actress-bobbie-phillips-launching-cover-up-scheme/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on November 29, 2018, 02:45:40 PM
How exciting, they should make a show about this!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2018, 02:47:02 PM
Why, it can star Charlie Rose and Matt Lauer!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2018, 05:07:08 PM
CBS must really need new actors....

"California Democratic party chair resigns amid sexual misconduct claims"

Why golly gee - I'm sensing a trend in political leanings. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-democratic-party-chair-resigns-amid-sexual-misconduct-claims (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-democratic-party-chair-resigns-amid-sexual-misconduct-claims)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on November 29, 2018, 08:09:59 PM
It's been a bad day for liberals who would tell us what to think as yet another mouth breathing idiot has been accused.  Again.  On a positive note, there's now plenty of new actors available for CBS's new show "Rape Island" , brought to you be the DNC:

"Two More Women Accuse Neil deGrasse Tyson of Sexual Misconduct"

Watson says she had been working directly under Tyson, who called out Trump in 2016 by saying he would grab him by the crotch when they met, and that they got along well. That all changed, however, when he invited his underling to his apartment at around 10:30 P.M. to "share a bottle of wine" and "unwind for a couple of hours."

Watson, who said she felt pressured to impress her superstar boss, told me she agreed to come in for a glass of wine instead. Upon entering his apartment, Tyson allegedly took off his shoes and shirt, remaining in a tank top undershirt. Unfortunately, the night only got more awkward as Tyson, who is married, reportedly put on romantic music and replayed the most graphic parts."

That out fit alone should get him the chair....
(https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/780/2018/11/PictureofNDTandKatelyn-1.png)

When asked, "Where all the white woman at?" Tyson had an answer:  NASA!

But hey, he's totally right about one thing - global warming is a real, actual thing.  As long as you don't count winter.  Or fall.  Or spring.  But summer's still like super-duper hot.  Usually. 

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/nosacredcows/2018/11/two-more-women-accuse-neil-degrasse-tyson-of-sexual-misconduct/?fbclid=IwAR18GcUuHKFOYjZN2_fepp-SWmPNtoKu1EJx1M_3Y_1-BhWQJb1l72ia0IY (https://www.patheos.com/blogs/nosacredcows/2018/11/two-more-women-accuse-neil-degrasse-tyson-of-sexual-misconduct/?fbclid=IwAR18GcUuHKFOYjZN2_fepp-SWmPNtoKu1EJx1M_3Y_1-BhWQJb1l72ia0IY)



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 14, 2018, 08:01:52 AM
Neil Degrasse Tyson? I'd tell him to get some better game, but that would just get more whiney accusations thrown at him. At least the accusations might not be as embarrassing though.

He really does need to stop the cringey, apologetic mansplaining. NEVER apologize nor plead your case to crybullies or concern trolls. It never helps you. No one's mind will be changed, and you will only get more contempt and scorn. Aggressively fighting back with righteous fury is the only chance of getting any respect, not just from others, but from yourself. And if you're not going to do that, just walk away and shut up.

When will men (particularly rich ones) start filing lawsuits against lying bitches for their phony rape allegations? They are begging to be sued into the stone age for slander, libel, and defamation. I mean, think of the thots! How will those talentless young women with zero acting ability ever be able to sleep their way into lucrative careers in Hollywood? Their lives are ruined! Think about them and their needs. I mean, if you must white knight and can't bear to fight for your own welfare, and that is what it takes. Whatever works. Somebody needs to get some balls, for fuck's sake.

In other news...

Wall Street is going full MGTOW.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-03/a-wall-street-rule-for-the-metoo-era-avoid-women-at-all-cost (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-03/a-wall-street-rule-for-the-metoo-era-avoid-women-at-all-cost)

Anything men do to try and protect themselves is "rape."
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7867376/women-consent-videos-before-sex-recorded-accused-rape-assault/ (https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7867376/women-consent-videos-before-sex-recorded-accused-rape-assault/)
https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2018/10/215056/consent-videos-sex-rape (https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2018/10/215056/consent-videos-sex-rape)

Didn't this just used to be called marriage?
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/sex-for-rent-landlord-tenant-modern-slavery-housing-crisis-homelessness-rape-abuse-a8657561.html (https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/sex-for-rent-landlord-tenant-modern-slavery-housing-crisis-homelessness-rape-abuse-a8657561.html)

And I'm not buying this woman's buyer's remorse until she admits feminism is cancer and helps to repeal the 19th.
https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/actress-mourns-death-compliments-work (https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/actress-mourns-death-compliments-work)
“A lack of respect, which as Alexis de Tocqueville explains in his famed tome Democracy in America, stems from a demand for equality between the sexes. When this lack of respect disappears, Tocqueville writes, men cave to the 'despotic sway of women' and don’t enjoy their company, while women grow weaker and more timid.”

Men can no longer enjoy women's company because men have caved to “the despotic sway of women” and, at the request of women, have now built incentive structures that make such enjoyment effectively impossible and illegal. That's like making it the law that children get to stay up all night and eat ice cream whenever they want because children demanded it. It's like letting children vote. It's idiocy. It is amazing though, that even Tocqueville said that men need to stop being such fucking cucks.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 14, 2018, 08:19:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/B4DNbjIVDhA


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 14, 2018, 12:12:06 PM
Kelly McGillis.  That's funny.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 17, 2018, 10:33:54 PM
And the biggest money loss b/c "metoo" is now Les "hit the button to get your dick sucked by an intern" Moonves:

"CBS announced Monday that former CEO Les Moonves will not receive his $120 million severance package after the board of directors concluded he violated company policy and was uncooperative with an investigation into sexual misconduct allegations.

The decision, which came after a five-month outside investigation, capped the downfall of one of television’s most influential figures, the biggest entertainment powerbroker to see his career derailed amid the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct."
----------------------------------------------------

Seriously, he had a button for intern dick sucking.  Which turns out to be a bad business decision.

https://apnews.com/7858ff2dc8044b139c99a20aed18c502


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 18, 2018, 09:38:02 AM
Where does one get this button?

Asking for a friend.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2018, 12:26:00 PM
Where does one get this button?

Asking for a friend.

Well, first you'd have to be an entertainment mastermind like Les!  Why, he's the powerhouse, no-one else better genius who hired Charlie Rose, Stephen Colbert, and green lit STAR TREK DISCOVERY and MURPHY BROWN.

You just don't have that wunder-kind talent.

'Cause if you did, CBS would pay you a $120 million retirement.  Now if that doesn't make good business sense all around, I don't know what does.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on December 18, 2018, 12:41:47 PM
Where does one get this button?

Asking for a friend.

Well, first you'd have to be an entertainment mastermind like Les!  Why, he's the powerhouse, no-one else better genius who hired Charlie Rose, Stephen Colbert, and green lit STAR TREK DISCOVERY and MURPHY BROWN.

You just don't have that wunder-kind talent.

'Cause if you did, CBS would pay you a $120 million retirement.  Now if that doesn't make good business sense all around, I don't know what does.

I have so much to learn...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2018, 01:57:12 PM
Disney actor busting for trying to bang a kid:

"'Disney' Actor Fired After Being Arrested For Trying To Solicit Sex With A 13-Year-Old Boy

Disney Channel actor Stoney Westmoreland was arrested after arranging to meet up with whom he believed to be a 13-year-old boy for a sexual encounter. Westmoreland, who plays the grandfather character named Henry Mack on Disney's "Andi Mack," was en route to meet the supposed child when he was apprehended by Salt Lake City police and the FBI Child Exploitation Task Force on Friday.

Disney announced Friday that they had terminated Westmoreland's role on the show due to the nature of the arrest. "Andi Mack" is filmed in Salt Lake City.

"​Stoney Westmoreland, an actor working on the series 'Andi Mack,' was arrested in Salt Lake City today," said a Disney Channel spokesperson, according to Page Six. "Given the nature of the charges and our responsibility for the welfare of employed minors, we have released him from his recurring role and he will not be returning to work on the series which wraps production on its third season next week."

Westmoreland, 48, has also appeared on ABC's "Scandal" and AMC's "Breaking Bad."
-----------------------------------------

Well, at least I don't think told us how to vote, so compared to some of the people on this list, he's relatively smart.  I mean besides the attempted child rape stuff.

Nothing says family values like hiring a pederast
(https://www.dailywire.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2018/12/stoney_westmoreland_gi.jpg?itok=ARuETAku)

https://www.dailywire.com/news/39422/disney-actor-fired-after-being-arrested-trying-amanda-prestigiacomo (https://www.dailywire.com/news/39422/disney-actor-fired-after-being-arrested-trying-amanda-prestigiacomo)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 18, 2018, 02:10:03 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/_YmDcCpD1gc


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2018, 02:17:25 PM
Gee, it's almost like Disney would purposefully ignore people who joked about banging kids as long as they kept making them money.

Nah, that would never happen. 


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on December 18, 2018, 03:21:20 PM
I'm trying to choose my words carefully here, but I'm beginning to doubt the efficacy of being quite so tolerant towards homosexuals in general at this point.

I'm obviously still all for being reasonable with people and the concept of innocence until proven guilty, but let's be honest, most of them, particularly the men because of how male and female sex drives work, have probably gone for underage boys at some point, maybe not prepubescents, but at least underage individuals, and when they were substantially older than them.

In Hollywood, it's potentially much worse. I don't absolutely know, but I wouldn't be shocked.

And Disney really does seem to be particularly out of control. Of course, if somebody's into that, what company would they want to work at?

It's pretty depressing.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2018, 03:39:05 PM
... but let's be honest, most of them, particularly the men because of how male and female sex drives work, have probably gone for underage boys at some point, maybe not prepubescents, but at least underage individuals, and when they were substantially older than them.

When Milo admitted as such, he was immediately pilloried.  White-hot career over.  Dead.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on December 18, 2018, 05:23:21 PM
Not Woody Allen too!  I always thought of him as a paragon of virtue....

"Actress Reveals That Woody Allen Began a Sexual Relationship With Her When She Was 16

Christina Engelhardt, now 59, opened up to The Hollywood Reporter in an extensive interview where she alleged starting a relationship with the now 83-year-old director when she was underage. Engelhardt said she has chosen to come forward now after reevaluating parts of her relationship with the famous director of Annie Hall. A former actress and model has come forward with claims that she had a relationship with Woody Allen that started when she was 16.

"What made me speak is I thought I could provide a perspective," she said. "I'm not attacking Woody. This is not 'bring down this man.' I'm talking about my love story. This made me who I am. I have no regrets."

Allen didn’t provide comment to THR and has not responded to a request for comment by PEOPLE.

Engelhardt said the relationship started when she gave Allen her number at a New York City restaurant in 1976 and he called her a few days later to invite her to his apartment. The two continued a relationship for 8 years in which they often met at his penthouse overlooking Central Park.

"The curtains were always drawn," Engelhardt said. "The view must have been spectacular. I wasn’t there for the view."
---------------------------------------

Well, she did have those 16 year old bedroom eyes....
(https://celebritypictures.wiki/thumbs/0257211/0257211_13.jpeg)

Certainly comes as a shock.  I mean just because MANHATTAN was based on his prior relationship with a 17 year old (while his was 42) shouldn't mean a thing.  Or the whole thing with Soon-Yi Previn.  Or Dylan Farrow (who was 7 at the time of alleged assault).

Yup, pure as driven snow.  It's just so surprising that Hollywood idolized this man for decades without ever finding out his secrets.  Yes, very surprising....


Already too old for the Woodster by the time she did HALLOWEEN 3.
(http://writetoreel.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Halloween-3-Ellie.jpg)

https://people.com/movies/woody-allen-romance-actress-alleges/?utm_campaign=peoplemagazine&xid=socialflow_twitter_peoplemag&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social (https://people.com/movies/woody-allen-romance-actress-alleges/?utm_campaign=peoplemagazine&xid=socialflow_twitter_peoplemag&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stacey_Nelkin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stacey_Nelkin)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 03, 2019, 07:18:52 PM
"Two More Women Accuse Neil deGrasse Tyson of Sexual Misconduct"

(https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/780/2018/11/PictureofNDTandKatelyn-1.png)


...And his show's been yanked:

"The National Geographic Channel said Thursday it has decided to pull Neil deGrasse Tyson''s "StarTalk" off the air for the time being, citing a Fox Networks Group investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct that came to light five weeks ago.

"In order to allow the investigation to occur unimpeded we chose to hold new episodes of 'StarTalk' until it is complete," a network spokesperson told Variety. "We expect that to happen in the next few weeks at which time we'll make a final decision."

"StarTalk" had aired just three episodes of its new season before new allegations by two women against the 60-year-old deGrasse Tyson surfaced in a story on the website Patheos, which describes itself as "the world's leading multi-faith site dedicated hosting the conversation on faith."

In a story published Nov. 29, Bucknell University professor Katelyn Allers alleged deGrasse Tyson had groped her at an astronomy meeting in 2009."
---------------------------------------

Hopefully this will rid the world of this laughing stock of a "scientist" who seems to understand as much about the scientific method as his does women.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/423759-neil-degrasse-tysons-startalk-pulled-from-air-amid-sexual-misconduct


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 24, 2019, 12:35:18 PM
Time for PEDS IN SPACE......

Michael Jackson doc apparently so bad for his image that fans are threatening violence (imagine that):
https://deadline.com/2019/01/michael-jackson-leaving-neverland-sundance-film-festival-police-concerns-protests-threats-1202538783/ (https://deadline.com/2019/01/michael-jackson-leaving-neverland-sundance-film-festival-police-concerns-protests-threats-1202538783/)

And....

"Director Bryan Singer accused by more men of underage sexual misconduct in bombshell report

Director Bryan Singer is the subject of a new bombshell report in which four men accuse him of sexually assaulting them when they were underage. The new allegations are just the latest in a long list of claims brought against Singer over the years, ranging from inappropriate touching to rape.

The report was published Wednesday by The Atlantic and the outlet said it was based in 50 sources — including the four men, who would not identify themselves for fear of repercussion. The exposé notes that the victims in question were left with psychological damage, substance-abuse problems, depression and PTSD after their experience.

One of the new accusers claimed Singer fondled him on a movie set when he was just 13 in 1997. Another claimed he was 17 when Singer had sex with him at a party at his house that same year while a third man alleged Singer had sex with him when he was just 15. A fourth man said he had sex with Singer when he was 16 after meeting the director at a series of parties the man claimed were designed to link underage boys with older men. All of the victims noted that Singer was aware of their ages at the time and was himself in his 30s.

In a statement provided to Fox News, Singer denounced the report as a 'homophobic smear piece."
-----------------------------------------

Naturally, none of this stopped Hollywood from hiring Singer to direct RHAPSODY.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/bohemian-rhapsody-director-bryan-singer-accused-by-more-men-of-underage-sexual-misconduct-in-bombshell-report (https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/bohemian-rhapsody-director-bryan-singer-accused-by-more-men-of-underage-sexual-misconduct-in-bombshell-report)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on January 24, 2019, 01:46:32 PM
Whew, man, do you get SECRET POWERS from ass-raping children??


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 24, 2019, 01:57:20 PM
Well, from that or putting live into a wood chipper.  Either or.

Hollywood - it's fantastic.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on January 25, 2019, 02:14:40 AM
Whew, man, do you get SECRET POWERS from ass-raping children??

No, but you do get compromised, blackmailed, and controlled before you are allowed to further climb the rungs of success.

How else are you going to get your Knights In Satan's Service card?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on January 25, 2019, 07:39:55 AM
Whew, man, do you get SECRET POWERS from ass-raping children??

No, but you do get compromised, blackmailed, and controlled before you are allowed to further climb the rungs of success.

How else are you going to get your Knights In Satan's Service card?

Quite, quite...


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 25, 2019, 02:52:48 PM
(https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.rZy6KF_Eo0gww02APL5nHAHaIU&w=189&h=208&c=7&o=5&pid=1.7)


"JACKO’S CHILD ‘BRIDE’ Michael Jackson ‘forced nine-year-old boy to ‘marry’ him in mock wedding then paid his dad £1 million not to talk about it’"

Huh.  That's weird.

At this point, there's zero doubt that Jackson liked 'em young so to speak.  Yet insanely his fans continue to deny reality; actually threatening violence to anyone who dares try to break up the cabal that obviously still exists in show biz.

I once asked Pig if you could separate the art from the artist.  He said yes.  For me, as it becomes more and more apparent that we're not talking about one or two people bu rather an entire sub-section of entertainment, the answer has to be no.

When I hear a Michael Jackson song pimping a product, that product becomes instantly radioactive to me.  What, does Capital One not know that Michael was a pedophile?  And yeah, I get that it's too bad that some very good songs now have to thrown in the trash, but too bad.  Maybe it'll convince some people to not simply look the other way in the future. 

As it is, it's just one more reason to tread very carefully when watching anything that comes out of Hollywood.

Thrill all night, huh Michael?
(https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NINTCHDBPICT000461143175.jpg?w=960)

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8280366/michael-jackson-forced-boy-9-marry-wedding-bribe-dad/ (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8280366/michael-jackson-forced-boy-9-marry-wedding-bribe-dad/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 26, 2019, 12:49:06 PM
Of course:

"Bryan Singer to Keep Directing ‘Red Sonja’ After New Sex Abuse Allegations

Following an expose that claimed Bryan Singer has seduced and molested several underage men, the film production company Millennium Films on Thursday said it is staunchly supporting the director.

In a statement, Avi Lerner, founder and chief executive of Millennium, said that the company is going forward with a remake of the fantasy adventure “Red Sonja” with Singer attached to direct.

The over $800 million ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ has grossed, making it the highest grossing drama in film history, is testament to his remarkable vision and acumen,” said Lerner."
--------------------------------------------------------------

Wait, there's money involved?  Well then I guess it's cool scro.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/01/26/bryan-singer-to-keep-directing-red-sonja-after-new-sex-abuse-allegations/ (https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/01/26/bryan-singer-to-keep-directing-red-sonja-after-new-sex-abuse-allegations/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on January 26, 2019, 02:07:02 PM
All for Moloch.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 07, 2019, 01:19:22 PM
Oh?

"British Academy of Film and Television Arts Suspends Bryan Singer Nomination Amid Sex Abuse Allegations
he British Academy of Film and Television Arts says it is suspending its nomination of director Bryan Singer amid accusations that he sexually assaulted minors.

Singer had been among those nominated for his work on the Queen biopic “Bohemian Rhapsody,” which he was fired from in late 2017. BAFTA says Wednesday that the organization considers the alleged behavior unacceptable and incompatible with its values and that Singer has been informed of the suspension.

The Atlantic magazine last month published an expose detailing the stories of four alleged victims who said they were seduced and molested by the Singer while underage. Singer has denied the allegations."
----------------------------------

Whether or not this will get Singer kicked off of RED SONYA remains to be seen, but as this Pedowood, I doubt it.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/02/07/british-academy-of-film-and-television-arts-suspends-bryan-singer-nomination-amid-sex-abuse-allegations/ (https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/02/07/british-academy-of-film-and-television-arts-suspends-bryan-singer-nomination-amid-sex-abuse-allegations/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 07, 2019, 06:01:43 PM
Pedowood is going on a shirt, book it.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 07, 2019, 06:05:49 PM
Mine own creation.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 12, 2019, 01:58:08 PM
Perhaps Pedowood slowly waking up to the fact that the internet is a real thing, and let's us see what's going on....

"Bryan Singer Movie ‘Red Sonja’ On Hold Amid Sexual Abuse Allegations

"It is no longer on the company's slate"

After tremendous pressure and public outcry, Millennium Films has temporarily halted going forward with the movie "Red Sonja" following allegations that director Bryan Singer ("X-Men") sexually abused underage males for nearly two decades.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, while Bryan Singer has not officially been removed as the director for "Red Sonja," the movie has been removed from the slate for Millennium Films.

"Singer has not officially been removed as director of the film, but it is no longer on the company's slate and it is not being shopped at this year's European Film Market in Berlin," THR reported.

The halting of "Red Sonja" follows a bombshell report published in The Atlantic last month that detailed as many four new allegations of sexual abuse against the director. Despite the controversy, the film's producer, Avi Lerner, publicly defended Singer as a victim of "agenda driven fake news." Singer was slated to earn a paycheck of $10 million to direct the movie.

After intense backlash, Lerner later clarified to The Hollywood Reporter that crisis PR guru Howard Bragman wrote the statement without him having read it. "I don't want to apologize. I just want to clarify [the statement]," Lerner said. "I think victims should be heard and this allegation should be taken very, very seriously. I just don't agree to judge by the Twitter. I want [the accused] to be judged by the court.""
------------------------------------------------------

We're such rubes after all. 

Not sure what's the better news - that Singer is now radioactive, or that what was sure to be a disaster of a movie has been stopped.

And way to believe all accusers there Lerner!  So brave of you not to actually fire the piece of shit and risk the wraith of other pedos in the wood, but shelve the entire project.

Run you fool!  Run very far away from Bryan Singer
(https://www.dailywire.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2019/02/singermckellan.jpg?itok=1Qx_W6u_)

https://www.dailywire.com/news/43338/bryan-singer-movie-red-sonja-hold-amid-sexual-paul-bois (https://www.dailywire.com/news/43338/bryan-singer-movie-red-sonja-hold-amid-sexual-paul-bois)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 13, 2019, 07:20:52 PM
Some more evidence Pedowood (TM by yours truly) might be waking up to the notion that raping little boys is a bad thing:

"Motown 60” TV Special: Smokey, Stevie, Diana, But Nary a Mention of Michael Jackson or the Jackson 5

Just about completely missing from the show is anything about the Jackson 5 or Michael Jackson. I found it stunning that there was no nod to Michael’s Moonwalk from the 1983 “Motown 25” show. It felt like the producers of tonight’s show– taped at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles– missed a poignant opportunity to feature the Jacksons (Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, Tito) as adults. One can only surmise that with the current Michael documentary airing soon on HBO, CBS wanted nothing to do with him.

At least Michael’s face was shown in the In Memoriam section.
"
-----------------------------------

Some people still don't get it apparently.

https://www.showbiz411.com/2019/02/13/motown-60-tv-special-smokey-stevie-diana-but-nary-a-mention-of-michael-jackson-or-the-jackson-5-plus-lionel-richie-drops-out (https://www.showbiz411.com/2019/02/13/motown-60-tv-special-smokey-stevie-diana-but-nary-a-mention-of-michael-jackson-or-the-jackson-5-plus-lionel-richie-drops-out)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 21, 2019, 05:30:52 PM
Quote
Some people still don't get it apparently.

Speaking of which....

"Michael Jackson Estate Sues HBO Over 'Leaving Neverland' Documentary

The Michael Jackson Estate is hardly letting go of Leaving Neverland, the documentary about the late pop star's alleged sexual abuse that will be airing on HBO next month. On Thursday, Optimum Productions and the two co-executors of the Jackson Estate sued HBO and parent company Time Warner claiming the documentary constitutes a breach of a non-disparagement clause in an old contract.

"Michael Jackson is innocent. Period," begins the complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court."

HBO issued a statement on Thursday, staying firm on its plans to premiere the documentary. "Despite the desperate lengths taken to undermine the film, our plans remain unchanged."
---------------------------------------------------

This puts me in the very odd position of having to have HBO's back.

Pure as the driven snow
(https://cdn1.thr.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/scale_crop_768_433/2019/02/michael_jackson-leaving_neverland-publicity-h_2019_.jpg)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/michael-jackson-estate-sues-hbo-violating-disparagement-deal-1188759 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/michael-jackson-estate-sues-hbo-violating-disparagement-deal-1188759)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on February 21, 2019, 06:54:44 PM
I love that their defense is breach of contract. Not that he’s innocent.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 22, 2019, 04:49:23 AM
I love that their defense is breath of contract. Not that he’s innocent.
Yeah, not exactly a "rigorous defense".


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 22, 2019, 10:36:00 AM
I honestly still have doubts about what Jacko did or didn't do.

He was a weirdo to be sure, but exactly what lines did he actually cross? It's still a question.

And when people want money they might say anything to get it.

Starwhackers.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 22, 2019, 10:44:59 AM
I honestly still have doubts about what Jacko did or didn't do.

He was a weirdo to be sure, but exactly what lines did he actually cross? It's still a question.


Still trying to moonwalk, huh?

Here, let this gay Asian help:

https://www.youtube.com/v/tjaT1bZ78Qs


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 22, 2019, 12:00:01 PM
Sorry.

I'll just go back to listening and believing.

(https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/55227882/i-find-your-lack-of-faith-disturbing-listen-and-believe.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 22, 2019, 12:03:03 PM
So you CAN feel it?

https://www.youtube.com/v/9nP4WE_-uqE


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 22, 2019, 12:10:12 PM
I feel little at this point.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 22, 2019, 12:12:07 PM
Not even for Sarah, Kyle?

(https://backtothebookshelf.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tumblr_mpserih55w1rkw3b7o1_500.png)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 22, 2019, 12:31:41 PM
I've loved her from the first time I saw that picture.

The one where she performs surgery on King Kong.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 22, 2019, 12:33:05 PM
I honestly still have doubts about what Jacko did or didn't do.

He was a weirdo to be sure, but exactly what lines did he actually cross? It's still a question.

Yeah, not really - he accurately described to the LAPD a series of discolorations on Jacko's dick to only someone who had seen it would know about.  They were about to prosecute when Jackson paid off the boy.  

This obviously important for two reasons - one, the kid's first act was not to try and blackmail or otherwise put the squeeze on, it was to call the cops, and two, that Jackson clearly did not want his day in court.

The reprehensible parenting and willingness by the DA/LAPD to not pursue the case are separate, though nearly equally distasteful topics.

One other thing - this new doc will be bad.  Like holy shit, how was this cat not in prison, bad.  Like so bad his estate will do anything to stop it because it's so bad stations will stop playing his music bad.  Something that should have happened a long time ago....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 22, 2019, 01:24:28 PM
I honestly still have doubts about what Jacko did or didn't do.

He was a weirdo to be sure, but exactly what lines did he actually cross? It's still a question.

Yeah, not really - he accurately described to the LAPD a series of discolorations on Jacko's dick to only someone who had seen it would know about.  

Come on, every kid in America could do that in the 80's.  You're going to need stronger proof than that, my friend.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 22, 2019, 01:52:55 PM
If I'd heard that one, I must have blocked it out.

It's not even about this particular subject.

I just tend to assume everything is a lie, even when someone says they're lying.

And yeah, what kid hadn't seen his dick in the eighties... or even the late seventies.

Alright. I admit it.

I asked "Why?" and he said it it was just human nature.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 22, 2019, 02:13:34 PM
Im taking this as your full admission to being an "MJ-PYT".


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 22, 2019, 03:40:22 PM
I want $3 million.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 03, 2019, 01:43:53 PM
Top ten undeniable Michael facts....

"1. There is no dispute that, at age 34, Michael Jackson slept more than 30 nights in a row in the same bed with 13-year-old Jordie Chandler at the boy’s house with Chandler’s mother present. He also slept in the same bed with Jordie Chandler at Chandler’s father’s house. The parents were divorced.

2. So far, five boys Michael Jackson shared beds with have accused him of abuse: Jordie Chandler, Jason Francia, Gavin Arvizo, Wade Robson, and Jimmy Safechuck. Jackson had the same nickname for Chandler and Arvizo: “Rubba.” He called Robson “Little One” and Safechuck “Applehead.”

3. Jackson paid $25 million to settle the Chandlers’ lawsuit, with $18 million going to Jordie, $2.5 million to each of the parents, and the rest to lawyers. Jackson said he paid that sum to avoid something “long and drawn out.” Francia also received $2.4 million from Jackson.

4. Michael Jackson suffered from the skin discoloration disease vitiligo. Jordie Chandler drew a picture of the markings on the underside of Jackson’s penis. His drawings were sealed in an envelope. A few months later, investigators photographed Jackson’s genitalia. The photographs matched Chandler’s drawings.

5. The hallway leading to Jackson’s bedroom was a serious security zone covered by video and wired for sound so that the steps of anyone approaching would make ding-dong sounds.

6. Jackson had an extensive collection of adult erotic material he kept in a suitcase next to his bed, including S&M bondage photos and a study of naked boys. Forensic experts with experience in the Secret Service found the fingerprints of boys alongside Jackson’s on the same pages. Jackson also had bondage sculptures of women with ball gags in their mouths on his desk, in full view of the boys who slept there.

7. According to the Neverland staff interviewed by the Santa Barbara authorities, no one ever saw or knew of a woman spending the night with Michael Jackson, including his two spouses, Debbie Rowe or Lisa Marie Presley. Rowe, the mother of two of Jackson’s children, made it clear to the Santa Barbara authorities that she never had sex with Jackson.

8. The parents of boys Jackson shared beds with were courted assiduously and given myriad expensive gifts. Wade Robson’s mother testified in the 2005 trial that she funneled wages through Jackson’s company and was given a permanent resident visa. Jimmy Safechuck’s parents got a house. Jordie Chandler’s mother got a diamond bracelet.

9. Two of the fathers of those who have accused Jackson, Jordie Chandler and Jimmy Safechuck, committed suicide. Both were estranged from their sons at the time.

10. In a 2002 documentary, Living with Michael Jackson, Jackson told Martin Bashir there was nothing wrong with sharing his bed with boys."


https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/03/10-undeniable-facts-about-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations (https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/03/10-undeniable-facts-about-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on March 03, 2019, 02:07:57 PM
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uKZL2ogi2h4/hqdefault.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 18, 2019, 03:57:34 PM
And another has fallen:

"Warner Bros.' Kevin Tsujihara to Exit as Studio Chief

 He has led the Burbank studio since 2013.

Kevin Tsujihara is exiting his role as chairman and CEO of Warner Bros. Entertainment, a job he’s held for six years.

"It is in the best interest of WarnerMedia, Warner Bros., our employees and our partners for Kevin to step down as Chairman and CEO of Warner Bros.," said WarnerMedia CEO John Stankey on Monday. The executive did not name a replacement for Tsujihara.

Stankey added, "Kevin has contributed greatly to the studio’s success over the past 25 years and for that we thank him. Kevin acknowledges that his mistakes are inconsistent with the Company’s leadership expectations and could impact the Company’s ability to execute going forward."

In a Hollywood Reporter article on March 6, text messages between the executive and Charlotte Kirk revealed that Tsujihara said that he would push for auditions for the actress amid an apparent sexual relationship that he was having with her. The actress appeared in two Warner Bros. films: 2016's How to Be Single and 2018's Ocean's 8. Tsujihara's personal attorney stated, "Mr. Tsujihara had no direct role in the hiring of this actress." An outside law firm continues to investigate the claims made against Tsujihara. 

In a separate memo Tsujihara sent to Warner staffers today, he said that after reflecting "on how the attention on my past actions might impact the company's future," he had decided to step down. He added that "it has become clear that my continued leadership could be a distraction and an obstacle to the company's continued success. The hard work of everyone within our organization is truly admirable, and I won't let media attention on my past detract from all the great work the team is doing."

Tsujihara's departure comes as John Stankey, named CEO of WarnerMedia in 2017, puts his stamp on the company in the wake of the AT&T's $85 billion to $105 billion acquisition of Time Warner, which was approved last spring and then upheld by a federal appeals court last month. In a major reorganization, announced March 4, Tsujihara had been given additional oversight responsibilities, including of a new kids and young adults business — bringing together family, kids and animation businesses from across WarnerMedia, including Cartoon Network, Adult Swim and Boomerang — as well as Otter Media, Turner Classic Movies and all activities around licensed consumer products development for WarnerMedia properties."
-----------------------------------

Maybe this helps DC?  Can't hurt....

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/warner-bros-kevin-tsujihara-exit-as-studio-chief-1054951 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/warner-bros-kevin-tsujihara-exit-as-studio-chief-1054951)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 18, 2019, 04:31:30 PM
Allegedly that's one of the texts Charlotte Kirk made to Kevin Tsujihara:

“You’re very busy I know but when were in that motel having sex u said u would help me and when u just ignore me like you’re doing now it makes me feel used. Are u going to help me like you u said u would?”

(https://i.imgur.com/JhuKoRB.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 18, 2019, 04:45:31 PM
Whore?  Of course.

But guess what - John's should knew that whores expect to be paid, and this fool didn't pay up.

Basic contract law yo.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 18, 2019, 05:02:22 PM
Whore?  Of course.

But guess what - John's should knew that whores expect to be paid, and this fool didn't pay up.

Basic contract law yo.

Yes. He certainly is a dumbass.


Put him in charge of the children.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 20, 2019, 12:00:09 PM
Chantal Cousineau Hasn’t Worked Since Leading #MeToo Charge Against James Toback
https://deadline.com/2019/03/chantal-cousineau-hasnt-worked-since-leading-me-too-charge-against-james-toback-1202576982/

Cousineau, who testified before the state Senate in January 2018 to strengthen laws against sexual harassment in the industry, said she can’t say for sure that she’s been blacklisted in the commercial industry because of her advocacy. But she makes a strong case that she has.

It's called self-protection.

I don't even think EGE would allow her their set.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on March 20, 2019, 12:38:40 PM
Say it with me....

"Get Woke...."


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on March 20, 2019, 12:40:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/v/U75GPEksE3U


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 20, 2019, 01:25:36 PM
https://www.youtube.com/v/U75GPEksE3U

More like hump or continue to be a waitress.

Alas, that's all over now.

No more fucking and sucking your way to the top.

https://www.youtube.com/v/8O3YxoFGK2c


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 20, 2019, 03:19:25 PM
Quote
No more fucking and sucking your way to the top.

Has anyone alerted Jennifer Lawrence about this?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 20, 2019, 03:34:42 PM
Quote
No more fucking and sucking your way to the top.

Has anyone alerted Jennifer Lawrence about this?

Just made it in under the wire.

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/SophisticatedSourBrocketdeer-size_restricted.gif)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 20, 2019, 03:52:19 PM
(https://movie-dude.co.uk/1Actors%20Images%20A/Alec%20Guinness%20%20Lawrence%20of%20Arabia%20(1962).jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 24, 2019, 11:45:48 AM
Barbara Streisand - never very smart or nice:

"Barbra Streisand Apologizes for Saying Michael Jackson’s Molestation Accusers were ‘Thrilled to Be There’

Barbra Streisand apologized Saturday for her remarks about Michael Jackson and two men who have accused him of sexual abuse, saying that she should have chosen her words more carefully and that she admires the accusers for “speaking their truth.”

Streisand had received bitter criticism online after she was quoted in The Times of London as saying that Jackson’s accusers were “thrilled to be there” during the alleged abuse, which “didn’t kill them.”
------------------------------------------

Dear stupid - your casual remark in defense of a giant piece of shit who with any luck is burning in hell isn't a great look.  Signed, everyone.  PS - maybe you should not talk anymore, as you're idiocy actually hurts to read.

Best of friends!
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2019/03/babmichaelJ1-640x480.jpg)


https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/03/24/barbra-streisand-apologizes-saying-michael-jacksons-accusers-were-thrilled-to-be-there/ (https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/03/24/barbra-streisand-apologizes-saying-michael-jacksons-accusers-were-thrilled-to-be-there/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Gunslinger on March 24, 2019, 12:25:39 PM
Will ‘The Streisand Effect’ gain a new meaning?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 24, 2019, 12:54:16 PM
Beyond a whiny spoiled faded star constantly making things worse for herself because of her own idiocy?

One can only hope.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 24, 2019, 03:16:45 PM
Will ‘The Streisand Effect’ gain a new meaning?

No.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on March 25, 2019, 06:45:20 AM
I love that; "Thrilled to be there"

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51VRdpYNU9L._SY355_.jpg)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on January 31, 2020, 05:08:24 PM
"Harvey Weinstein Does Not Have Testicles, Rape Accuser Testifies

“The first time I saw him fully naked, I felt, I thought he was deformed and intersex,” Mann testified.

“He has extreme scarring that I didn’t know if maybe he was a burn victim,” she added. “He does not have testicles and it appears like he has a vagina.”

“When I first saw him naked, I was filled with compassion, absolute compassion,” the former actress said while crying. “It seemed his anger came from a place of shame.”
------------------------------

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ROSUWwD62zs/hqdefault.jpg)


https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/31/harvey-weinstein-rape-accuser-testifies-jessica-mann/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 02, 2020, 07:14:27 PM
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/leviticus-161-34-the-scapegoat-ritual/ (https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/leviticus-161-34-the-scapegoat-ritual/)

https://youtu.be/aA6zd0ZWQGc (https://youtu.be/aA6zd0ZWQGc)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 07, 2020, 01:25:27 PM
Are we supposed to believe that an entity with no male genitalia raped women with his telekinesis like Chevy Chase in MODERN PROBLEMS or something?

This makes as much sense and Chewbacca living on Endor.



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 24, 2020, 12:21:10 PM
Well it took nearly a year and a half after I started this thread, but Harvey's finally been convicted of rape by a NT jury.

Looks like the walker didn't work:

"Capping one of the most dramatic falls from power in Hollywood history, Harvey Weinstein was convicted Monday on one rape and one criminal sex act count, guilty verdicts that could put him in prison for up to 25 years.

The shamed former movie producer, 67, was found guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree for forcibly performing oral sex on former “Project Runway” production assistant Miriam “Mimi” Haleyi and rape in the third degree for an attack on hairstylist Jessica Mann.

But the verdict wasn’t a total victory for prosecutors. The seven-man, five-woman jury found Weinstein not guilty of the top charge of predatory sexual assault, which carried a life sentence."
--------------------------------------

Of course, 25 years in prison (if he gets it, which is very unlikely) would be a death sentence in itself.

As a side note, like other celebrities facing multiple charges, Harvey would have been far better served by pleading.  It's incredibly rare to be found innocent of all charges in cases of this sort, even without having a defendant as unsympathetic as Harvey.  Thus his defense team did him an incredible disservice by not dissuading him from going to trial.

Obviously this conviction puts all manner of egg on Hollywood's face, particularly the scores of famous women who called Harvey "God". 

Seeing as Harvey has all manner of dirt on other people - including the Clintons - don't be too shocked if he fatally "slips on a bar of soap" in his prison cell sometime soon.

https://pagesix.com/2020/02/24/harvey-weinstein-verdict-jury-convicts-on-two-sex-crimes-charges/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 24, 2020, 02:33:49 PM
His death, from 40 stab wounds in the back has been ruled a "suicide".


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 24, 2020, 02:36:04 PM
His death, from 40 stab wounds in the back has been ruled a "suicide".

Happens all the time pal, buzz off.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on February 24, 2020, 06:57:13 PM
Sex is rape.

Murder is suicide.



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 25, 2020, 07:57:36 AM
Quote
Seeing as Harvey has all manner of dirt on other people - including the Clintons - don't be too shocked if he fatally "slips on a bar of soap" in his prison cell sometime soon.

Quickest Epstein ever:

"Harvey Weinstein taken to Bellevue Hospital as ‘precautionary measure’"

But don't worry, a nurse is on the way!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ERldJADUcAExKJj?format=jpg&name=medium)

https://pagesix.com/2020/02/24/harvey-weinstein-taken-to-bellevue-hospital-as-precautionary-measure/


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 25, 2020, 10:58:34 AM
His death, from 40 stab wounds in the back has been ruled a "suicide".

Happens all the time pal, buzz off.

Is your license in order?


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 25, 2020, 12:47:46 PM
Two two four.

With noodles.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 25, 2020, 01:29:23 PM
Captain Bryant, toka!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 25, 2020, 01:36:36 PM
Tell him I'm eating.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 25, 2020, 01:43:00 PM
No choice, pal.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on February 25, 2020, 01:59:06 PM
You know the score - if you're not cop, you're little people.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on February 26, 2020, 04:37:34 PM
You can learn a lot from this guy, Gaff, He's a regular one-man slaughterhouse, that's what he is!


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 11, 2020, 11:40:41 AM
Well, how right I was when way back I when I started this thread titled "Harvey Weinstein = fucked" as today a judge gave Harvey what amounts to a life sentence for rape:

"Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to 23 Years in Prison for Rape and Sexual Assault

Disgraced movie mogul and Democrat party mega-donor turned convicted Hollywood sex offender Harvey Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in prison on Wednesday following his conviction on two sex charges.

The judge’s decision likely represents a life sentence for Weinstein, who is 67 and has stated that he is in poor health."
-----------------------------------

Harvey's bang up legal team had been asking the judge for a 5 year sentence.  Apparently the judge didn't believe Harvey needed that walker either.  Harvey still faces yet more charges in LA.

As I noted earlier, it was just a horrific act of hubris to not take a plea deal.  His lawyers should have fought tooth and nail against a trial, but if a client wants a trial, you gotta give it to him.

Of course, Harvey bet a lot on Hillary being President - he donated nearly $1.5 million to her 2016 campaign and millions more to other dems - but when she lost he should have realized there would be no get out of jail free card for his various peccadillos....

Harvey's appealing the convictions, but the chances are very slim he wins on that front, regardless of bribes donations to high powered dems - he's just too radioactive... and guilty.  


https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/03/11/harvey-weinstein-sentenced-to-23-years-in-prison-for-rape-and-sexual-assault/ (https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/03/11/harvey-weinstein-sentenced-to-23-years-in-prison-for-rape-and-sexual-assault/)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on March 11, 2020, 12:23:42 PM
So....

Will it be suicide?

Will he 'spill the beans'?

Or, is HE the beans?

You know he'll never make it to the prison gates.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 11, 2020, 12:29:39 PM
Pig, you're such a cynic!  Lot's of people slip on bars of soap, accidentally falling to a running wood chipper in the process.

Oh sure, conspiracy nuts like you will question why a brand new wood chipper would be in a prison shower to begin with, but I assure you it happens all the time.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 11, 2020, 12:40:31 PM
What human bean juice would he spill?

The fact that the Hollywood casting couch really exists as it has for over a hundred years?

The fact that women will have sex with you even if you look like a troll as long as there's the potential for fame and tens of millions of dollars?

I don't think these things are secrets.



Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 11, 2020, 12:47:44 PM
Oh, he isn't as likely to have Epstein-level dirt/pictures, but in the grand scheme of things, wouldn't it just be better for everyone if Harvey got wood-chippered?

It's the only way to be sure.

And in a related story, the judge in the case has amended his official sentencing to read, "Harvey Weinstein is sentenced to 23 Years in Prison with possible early release due to suicide."

So he's got that going for him.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 12, 2020, 12:22:35 AM
Whatever he actually did or didn't do, he clearly didn't get a fair trial.

One of the jurors even wrote a whole book about the eeeevils of older men being with younger women. It's ridiculous.

And the way "third degree rape" is defined in the state of NY is not actual rape at all.

The woman can contend that she withdrew consent during coitus, but only in her mind without making any indication that could be perceived by her partner. That's enough to make it "rape."

If being as rich and powerful as Weinstein won't help a man in court, what does the average guy have?

None.

Justice is dead.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Warpig on March 12, 2020, 06:00:36 AM
I need a "I ❤️ rape" shirt.

I'll wear it next time I get selected for jury duty.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 12, 2020, 09:05:36 AM
One of the jurors even wrote a whole book about the eeeevils of older men being with younger women. It's ridiculous.

Where did you see that?  I can't find it anywhere.  If accurate, it'd be an appeal-able issue (which makes me think it isn't true).  If his legal team allowed someone like that on the jury, then they were even worse then I thought.  

I did find this though:

"Late Friday morning, three white men and two white women were added to the panel of seven jurors selected on Thursday. Additionally, a white man, black woman and Latina woman were chosen as alternates.

On Thursday, the court picked four men and three women to serve on the jury in the high-profile case of Weinstein, 67, who is charged with five counts of sexual assault and rape in New York. Two of those jurors are black, two are white and one is Afro-Latina."
-------------------------

Ultimately, 7 men were assigned to the jury.  For Harvey to be found guilty, all the men  on the jury would have to believe he did it.  And of course, Harvey was acquitted of the two most serious charges, the ones that carried automatic life sentences.  So they weren't just slam dunking guilty charges.

Harvey - beyond not accepting a plea deal - didn't help his cause much by using a walker, but then getting caught bouncing a chick on his lap at a NY restaurant.  It's uncertain whether or not the jury saw or heard about such events, but the judge almost certainly did.

Now perhaps the sentence was too large considering what he was actually convicted of, but again, that's why you don't piss on a judges' shoes and call it rain, which Harvey & his lawyers seemed to do at every turn. 

Harvey innocent?  There's not much about his past to suggest that he is, and a lot to suggest the opposite.  While there are plenty of women who lie about rape, there's plenty who don't.  

He rolled the dice and came up snake-eyes.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/01/17/harvey-weinstein-judge-lawyer-jury-selection-new-york/4492030002/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/01/17/harvey-weinstein-judge-lawyer-jury-selection-new-york/4492030002/)

https://www.npr.org/2020/02/24/805258433/harvey-weinstein-found-guilty-of-rape-but-acquitted-of-most-sexual-assault-charg (https://www.npr.org/2020/02/24/805258433/harvey-weinstein-found-guilty-of-rape-but-acquitted-of-most-sexual-assault-charg)

https://gothamist.com/news/video-two-women-confronted-harvey-weinstein-les-bar-got-thrown-out (https://gothamist.com/news/video-two-women-confronted-harvey-weinstein-les-bar-got-thrown-out)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 12, 2020, 04:10:24 PM
The juror's name is Amanda Brainerd.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8016405/This-Harvey-Weinstein-juror-wrote-book-predatory-older-men.html (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8016405/This-Harvey-Weinstein-juror-wrote-book-predatory-older-men.html)


Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. has also proudly stated “It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”

https://www.theatlantavoice.com/articles/manhattan-district-attorney-rape-accusations-are-as-good-ss-proof/ (https://www.theatlantavoice.com/articles/manhattan-district-attorney-rape-accusations-are-as-good-ss-proof/)

That Atlanta article particularly on the lynchings of black men for rape of white women To Kill A Mockingbird style, but this could potentially apply to anyone.

A criminal trial is obviously not, in theory, supposed to be about declaring someone innocent, but whether they've been proven or not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The issue I'm pointing out has nothing to do with Weinstein's particular guilt or innocence, but the way these Kafkaesque kangaroo courts are operating with witch hunt tactics that throw due process in the trash, particularly in a Democrat-controlled (and, therefore, a feminist-controlled) court system like NYC.

Also, that there were men on the jury is, at best, irrelevant. In reality, they might feel even more social pressure to convict on something than most women would.

(https://static.wixstatic.com/media/4666fd_3f522335a7a64bbf905800c30116731a~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_555,h_312,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/4666fd_3f522335a7a64bbf905800c30116731a~mv2.webp)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 12, 2020, 04:38:12 PM
If that judge kept knowingly the juror on, he deserves an ass-kicking.

But again, did Harvey's lawyers even bother to protest and/or preserve it for the record?  Nothing about his legal team was impressive.  Johnnie Cockrane they ain't.


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 12, 2020, 04:51:18 PM
The controversial Harvey Weinstein juror who authored upcoming juicy novel about predatory older men who seduce young women - and who defense lawyers tried to get removed over her book reviews

- Amanda Brainerd served as a juror on Harvey Weinstein's criminal case
- She wrote the upcoming book Age of Consent, which is about predatory older men who seduce much younger women, DailyMail.com can disclose
- Her identity can now be revealed because the case has concluded
- Although Brainerd's book was written before she was selected as a juror, her novel contains a scene that is similar to a victim's testimony given during the trial
- Brainerd was the most controversial of the jurors but by the time her name came up, Weinstein's lawyers had used all their peremptory jury challenges
- His team tried again last Tuesday to have her removed after they discovered she wrote an online review of a book called My Dark Vanessa

- Brainerd wrote she admired 'the claustrophobia of Vanessa's isolation, the repulsiveness of her predator, and her entrapment in the relationship'
- Weinstein was found guilty of third degree rape and a criminal sexual act on Monday morning, as he now faces up to 25 years in prison

By Daniel Bates For Dailymail.com

Published: 12:17 EDT, 24 February 2020 | Updated: 03:58 EDT, 25 February 2020

...

Weinstein's lawyers tried to claim Brainerd had misrepresented herself in her jury questionnaire but the judge allowed her to serve.

Just before the jury was sent out for deliberations, his legal team made another two attempts to have her replaced by an alternate.

Weinstein's lawyer Damon Cheronis complained about the review of My Dark Vanessa, by author Elizabeth Russell, posted on the website Goodreads, in which Brainerd said she read it last August, long before the trial started.


...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8016405/This-Harvey-Weinstein-juror-wrote-book-predatory-older-men.html (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8016405/This-Harvey-Weinstein-juror-wrote-book-predatory-older-men.html)


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: jdv on March 12, 2020, 05:28:46 PM
Using your pre-emps in one of the key skills (IE - you always save one)....


Title: Re: Harvey Weinstein = fucked
Post by: Plissken on March 16, 2020, 04:42:53 PM
An interesting interview with Donna Rotunno.

The questions she's being asked are totally absurd.

Women must apparently be instantly believed and never questioned when accusing a man of something.

No cross examination should be permitted in a trial?

Why bother with a trial at all?

J'accuse and you're guilty, straight to prison with you.

Due process is obsolete.

We don't even need defense lawyers anymore, at least for men when their accusers are women.


Donna's pretty fucking based.

https://www.youtube.com/v/IjX9fXk32vo